No Tags Found!

Chaitanya ji ..on the time of appointment did all clauses regarding shifts where clear to employee or not....if not then he has full rights to object on this issue....
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Chaitanya,

Please review his appointment letter as it contains service terms and conditions. These include provisions such as the ability to be called in on a weekly off, any shift, any location, or any department as per the exigencies of work. He may accept these terms by signing the document. Based on this, you can proceed with the inquiry.

From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I still find it difficult to believe your post. The company runs only one shift but changes the week every week. That is not possible. A shift change will require the approval of the factory inspector or other authorities under the Industrial Dispute Act every time. And why would someone run the second shift without running the first shift? But if the person has come in a shift the Company is not operating, you do not need to pay him. Mark him absent and deduct the salary. Separately, you can initiate disciplinary action. But I don't think your post is true.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I too agree with Mr.Banerjees view. Until you provide clear facts of the incident it will be difficult for us give our opinion on only prediction Adoni Suguresh Labour Laws Consultant.
From India, Bidar
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Yes, as Saswata said, you need to be clear on the facts. I thought your company is running more than one shift in a day, which is common, and the employee is working in the shift for which his request was denied but not in the shift to which he was assigned. Unless the facts are clearly stated, it is not possible to reply properly. The members above have raised some queries; please reply to them as it may reveal some facts.

B. Saikumar

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I think a lot of facts are not being provided here.

One point that needs to be kept in mind is that the working conditions cannot be changed without the approval of the Labour Department, changes in the Standing Order, or in agreement with the Worker's Union.

What are the terms and conditions of the employment?

Is working in such a haphazard random shift mentioned in the Appointment Letter?

It might be better to counsel the employee rather than taking disciplinary action. One should try to keep one's house in order first before taking on such matters which may turn out to be counter-productive.

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I don't understand where the matter of fact or false is appearing here. I just asked whether I could get any insights in such a case. Why can't it be treated as a case study if not a fact? In fact, that was a real incident where a few operations of the plant ran in one shift one week and the other shift the following week, and vice versa. This operation is done for the flexibility of materials availability. If you feel that this is not a fact, just treat it as a virtual case study.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Chaitanya,

Please do not get offended when people raise questions. I just checked your profile and it appears that you work as a Dy Manager. People raise these questions to get a clear picture of the scenario to give precise answers. When we start assuming things, and our assumptions are wrong, we end up making an "ASS of U and ME". That's what a tutor on a management course told us.

The key question is: have the workers been told in their contract that they have to work in this pattern of working and have they agreed to this, or is this something new that has been devised due to the non-availability of material?

From your last post, it appears that there are other areas which work on normal shifts and only this section or some sections operate this scheme. The more information that we can give, the better the answers that we will get. It's possible that some of our experts have not come across such a situation and, hence, raise questions.

From United Kingdom
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Mr. Chaitanya,

The members on this site are not here to answer vague case studies. Most of us are spending our time sharing knowledge, helping with real problems, and learning in the process. Perhaps you don't realize this and expect people to drop everything and respond to your questions when you are not willing to provide full details.

Members of the forum are always willing to search for and answer questions, but if you are not willing to provide details, you may receive incorrect answers, if any at all.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Mr. Chaitanya,

I hope you have gone through the above comments. Please try to understand that even if it is a case study, the objective is to understand the matter and find a solution that will provide some sort of learning to others when faced with a similar situation. Is this not the purpose?

Now, the facts of the case are vital because it is on these that the matter is understood and taken into consideration, and solutions are looked for. One can hide or suppress the facts that can identify the personalities or company involved. This is just to maintain privacy and confidentiality of the matter.

But my dear friend, if you start distorting the basic facts and circumstances of the case, how do you expect that you will get the correct solution or opinions? Please take some time and reflect on these points before forcing your assumptions on others.

Warm regards.

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.