Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you in advance.
I am working as a Finance & Accounts Manager, and I am overseeing an entire group consisting of 4 companies with a turnover of 100Cr.
During a recent interview, I was asked about the reason for changing jobs from a big company to a small company. They wanted to know why I wanted to make the switch. I responded by stating that I am looking for a change for career growth, professional development, and skill enhancement. However, they pointed out that I had significant responsibilities in my previous role and questioned how I could claim to seek career growth. They seemed unsatisfied with my answer.
I am unsure of how to address this question effectively. Could you please suggest a suitable response?
Regards,
Rakesh Reddy
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1Thank you in advance.
I am working as a Finance & Accounts Manager, and I am overseeing an entire group consisting of 4 companies with a turnover of 100Cr.
During a recent interview, I was asked about the reason for changing jobs from a big company to a small company. They wanted to know why I wanted to make the switch. I responded by stating that I am looking for a change for career growth, professional development, and skill enhancement. However, they pointed out that I had significant responsibilities in my previous role and questioned how I could claim to seek career growth. They seemed unsatisfied with my answer.
I am unsure of how to address this question effectively. Could you please suggest a suitable response?
Regards,
Rakesh Reddy
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Rakesh,
What your interviewer asked is a logical question. A person who handles finances or accounts worth Rs 100 Cr of his company, when showing readiness to climb for the sake of career growth, brings out a mismatch in the argument. Real career growth would happen when a person moves from handling 100 Cr to 200 Cr, and from there to 500 Cr or even greater.
Probably, the argument was unpalatable to the interviewer, and he became distrustful. Possibly, he perceived that there could be some internal turmoil that made the candidate desperate. Out of desperation, the candidate wanted to grab whatever came his way.
The opposite of what happened with you is also true. In every industry, there are companies that are industry leaders. People from these companies are often poached by other unbranded companies. For every branded company, there are over 100 unbranded companies, and these companies consider a candidate from a well-established company a prized catch. However, this did not happen with you.
Anyway, all employers are not the same. But next time, consider appearing for the interview only if the company states that their turnover is far more than Rs 100 Cr.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
What your interviewer asked is a logical question. A person who handles finances or accounts worth Rs 100 Cr of his company, when showing readiness to climb for the sake of career growth, brings out a mismatch in the argument. Real career growth would happen when a person moves from handling 100 Cr to 200 Cr, and from there to 500 Cr or even greater.
Probably, the argument was unpalatable to the interviewer, and he became distrustful. Possibly, he perceived that there could be some internal turmoil that made the candidate desperate. Out of desperation, the candidate wanted to grab whatever came his way.
The opposite of what happened with you is also true. In every industry, there are companies that are industry leaders. People from these companies are often poached by other unbranded companies. For every branded company, there are over 100 unbranded companies, and these companies consider a candidate from a well-established company a prized catch. However, this did not happen with you.
Anyway, all employers are not the same. But next time, consider appearing for the interview only if the company states that their turnover is far more than Rs 100 Cr.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
but what should i give a reason to avoid this kind of poaching
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Rakesh,
To avoid the repetition of this unpleasant episode, you may choose a company that has a turnover of more than Rs 200 Cr. In India, looking for a company that has a turnover of more than Rs 200 Cr is not ideal. There are thousands of companies in Hyderabad. Secondly, even if you get an inbound call from a company that has a smaller turnover, you may ask them whether it would be acceptable for them to consider a candidate who works in a company with a financial turnover of Rs 100 Cr. With this prior approval, you can save yourself from this embarrassing situation in the interview.
Nevertheless, my strong recommendation is to aim higher and select a company that has a turnover of Rs 200 Cr and above. If you compromise and accept a lower turnover for the sake of salary today, when you are looking for a job after 5-6 years, you may find yourself needing to target companies with a turnover of Rs 100 Cr. This would bring you back to square one, giving you a sense of deja vu.
All the best!
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
To avoid the repetition of this unpleasant episode, you may choose a company that has a turnover of more than Rs 200 Cr. In India, looking for a company that has a turnover of more than Rs 200 Cr is not ideal. There are thousands of companies in Hyderabad. Secondly, even if you get an inbound call from a company that has a smaller turnover, you may ask them whether it would be acceptable for them to consider a candidate who works in a company with a financial turnover of Rs 100 Cr. With this prior approval, you can save yourself from this embarrassing situation in the interview.
Nevertheless, my strong recommendation is to aim higher and select a company that has a turnover of Rs 200 Cr and above. If you compromise and accept a lower turnover for the sake of salary today, when you are looking for a job after 5-6 years, you may find yourself needing to target companies with a turnover of Rs 100 Cr. This would bring you back to square one, giving you a sense of deja vu.
All the best!
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello Mr. Rakesh,
While I agree with what Mr. Divekar says about finding bigger companies for a job change, a practical and logical answer can be given in a situation similar to yours. You can say that in smaller companies, the job role can become more significant and challenging. Therefore, you are someone who enjoys pursuing such challenges rather than a set standard job role.
Nisha Kapoor
Recruitment Consultant
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
While I agree with what Mr. Divekar says about finding bigger companies for a job change, a practical and logical answer can be given in a situation similar to yours. You can say that in smaller companies, the job role can become more significant and challenging. Therefore, you are someone who enjoys pursuing such challenges rather than a set standard job role.
Nisha Kapoor
Recruitment Consultant
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Nowadays, developing companies are looking for candidates from branded or established companies to implement better systems. Moreover, a candidate may currently be a part of a team in their present company, but they could potentially become the head of a team. Even though having less turnover in the present company is a better option.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
A beautiful confrontation of self and interview, interviewer, and growth. Is it money or a career in learning?
Let's first set aside the turnover and money. In your earlier company, let's assume you might not have looked after all transactions and responsibilities. There may be restrictions, and interaction with the developments and policies may be out of focus. This will certainly bring unsatisfactory work experience.
Your words should be: Of course, I was delighted to work with the mighty. Yet, I want to put and share policy issues, commit myself to further responsibilities where I want to explore more in my career. It is the growth I seek for self-learning in the field.
This will prove your attention and focus on growth, and money will automatically come next. Career growth is not simply the truth of money-related. Money is a motivator and not always the priority. Of course, your choice and selection are there for growth.
Always select a career after some time where you feel satisfied and not like life is unfulfilled.
From India, Arcot
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Let's first set aside the turnover and money. In your earlier company, let's assume you might not have looked after all transactions and responsibilities. There may be restrictions, and interaction with the developments and policies may be out of focus. This will certainly bring unsatisfactory work experience.
Your words should be: Of course, I was delighted to work with the mighty. Yet, I want to put and share policy issues, commit myself to further responsibilities where I want to explore more in my career. It is the growth I seek for self-learning in the field.
This will prove your attention and focus on growth, and money will automatically come next. Career growth is not simply the truth of money-related. Money is a motivator and not always the priority. Of course, your choice and selection are there for growth.
Always select a career after some time where you feel satisfied and not like life is unfulfilled.
From India, Arcot
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Job Change.pdf