In this case, the allegation is that he received the money from another bank with which he had no relationship. It is not a DA case. Let us wait for an expert to give their opinion on this issue.
From India, Kumbakonam
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1189From India, Kumbakonam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The position of DA case was mentioned in regard to the previous general statement of onus of proof in criminal cases. The issue is mainly termination of queries service on whatever grounds. In our country, the onus of proof should be governed by the following law:
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows: "16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows: "16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.