Dear Mr Sourabh
PFA copy of judgement in Mettur Spg Mills v Dy Com of Labour by the Madras High Court (1982) wherin the Hon'ble Judge held that to award any punishment after disc action, the employee has to be in the service and therefore will have to be kept under suspension. I am sure that this important judgement will be useful for our fraternity.
Regards
N Nataraajhan, Sakthi Management Services (HP : + 91 94835 17402 ; e-mail : )

From India, Bangalore
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: docx Mettur Spg Mills v Dy Com of Labour - Mad HC - 1982.docx (22.8 KB, 66 views)

when an employee wants to leave why you want to keep him,that too when he willing to pay notice pay, a right for employee under standard conditions of employment.Only thing you can do is dont release him without clearance of concerned departments.He must hand over company's proerty in good condition before he is relieved.
From India, Jamshedpur
Dear Friend

From your statement, it is understood that 3 employees were said to be involved in fraud which could not be attributable to any particular person among these three. Further, you are telling that one of the above three is already left your company. How did he leave ? Did he tender resignation for his post after issuing show cause notice? If so, why management accepted his resignation when the sow cause notice was pending? or else whether he has gone on unauthorized absence from duty on receipt of your of show cause notice?

If person who left your company is absents from duty, we have to doubt his integrity and accordingly we need to take disciplinary action against him on the grounds of not only fraud / financial loss to company but also on unauthorized absence from duty. But, you are telling that you gave notices to all 3 three employees and out of that 1 left. The remaining two are saying that they are innocent and and 3rd person who left the service is guilty.

To get the facts of the case, you need to issue charge sheet by framing relevant charge to all 3 including the person who stays away from duty and on receipt of explanation from these three, you need to conduct an inquiry if necessary to establish the charge. The inquiry officer can decides who is guilty of misconduct and accordingly you can award punishment to the person or persons who are said to be responsible for committing fraud.

Without following procedure, you can not establish the charge against any of above 3 employees. Further, you are telling that management does not want to loose the services of other two employees as there was a shortage of manpower. It indicates that your management is having dual stand with regard to employee who are alleged to have been committed financial irregularities. If the manpower is short, then they can take lenient view on any employee who commits misconduct and doing fraud in connection with company business. Is not leads to further indiscipline among other employees in your organisation. If the management stand is like this why they have issued show cause notices to 3 employees who are under reference?

I strongly suggest that person who is said be committed financial irregularity should not be kept in the services of company any longer which may prove detrimental to the interest of company on long run. This my advice and let us have expert opinion from our learned members

Regards

From India, Hyderabad
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.