Dear Friends,
Can you please tell me, as an HR professional, if an employee is not working and is instead engaging in chit-chat, does HR have the right to inform the team leader about their behavior?
Kindly suggest to me, please.
Thanks & Regards,
HR
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Can you please tell me, as an HR professional, if an employee is not working and is instead engaging in chit-chat, does HR have the right to inform the team leader about their behavior?
Kindly suggest to me, please.
Thanks & Regards,
HR
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear friend,
Before giving suggestions, it is important to know the type of industry you work in. What is your finished product or service? I ask this question because in some industries like IT and BPO/KPO, the atmosphere is a little relaxed. Since theirs is a target-based job, even if they spend time in prattle, it does not matter. In contrast, if your company is in the service sector, then tittle-tattle can be a luxury.
Coming to your query. The behavior of some of the employees that you have observed, why couldn't the Team Leader (TL) observe it? Why is this chitchat acceptable to him/her? What is the performance of this team? Going further, what about the Manager? Why is the manager silent on the laidback behavior of the TL?
Are the team members remaining in the office beyond their working hours? I recommend you conduct this study first. You may give indirect feedback to the TL on excess working hours put up by his/her team members.
The HR department is not a police department per se. HR cannot intervene immediately for some minor deviations. Nevertheless, as of now, you may keep your seniors informed about your observations.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
8029Before giving suggestions, it is important to know the type of industry you work in. What is your finished product or service? I ask this question because in some industries like IT and BPO/KPO, the atmosphere is a little relaxed. Since theirs is a target-based job, even if they spend time in prattle, it does not matter. In contrast, if your company is in the service sector, then tittle-tattle can be a luxury.
Coming to your query. The behavior of some of the employees that you have observed, why couldn't the Team Leader (TL) observe it? Why is this chitchat acceptable to him/her? What is the performance of this team? Going further, what about the Manager? Why is the manager silent on the laidback behavior of the TL?
Are the team members remaining in the office beyond their working hours? I recommend you conduct this study first. You may give indirect feedback to the TL on excess working hours put up by his/her team members.
The HR department is not a police department per se. HR cannot intervene immediately for some minor deviations. Nevertheless, as of now, you may keep your seniors informed about your observations.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
Greetings!
Thank you for your suggestions and advice. My industry is the e-commerce industry, and the Team Leader (TL) will be working the night shift, while team members work in split shifts. In the absence of the TL, some team members take advantage of this situation to engage in unnecessary chit-chat. I truly appreciate your feedback on this matter.
Thanks & Regards,
HR
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Greetings!
Thank you for your suggestions and advice. My industry is the e-commerce industry, and the Team Leader (TL) will be working the night shift, while team members work in split shifts. In the absence of the TL, some team members take advantage of this situation to engage in unnecessary chit-chat. I truly appreciate your feedback on this matter.
Thanks & Regards,
HR
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It is fine to inform the team leader and it should not be like complaining. The HR should tell him in such a way that people should understand and never repeat it here then.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear friend,
You have written that "that TL will be working in the night shift whereas the team member works in a split shift. As the TL is not there, he uses this opportunity to chit chat."
The situation in your company could be related to the classic English proverb "when the cat is away, the mice will play." This cat and mouse game demands reviewing the workload of the chatterbox. If he has sufficient time for prattle, then it merits increasing the workload. Give feedback to the TL in private; however, make sure that it should not antagonize the TL. He should not construe your feedback as nosiness.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
You have written that "that TL will be working in the night shift whereas the team member works in a split shift. As the TL is not there, he uses this opportunity to chit chat."
The situation in your company could be related to the classic English proverb "when the cat is away, the mice will play." This cat and mouse game demands reviewing the workload of the chatterbox. If he has sufficient time for prattle, then it merits increasing the workload. Give feedback to the TL in private; however, make sure that it should not antagonize the TL. He should not construe your feedback as nosiness.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I disagree with the views of some members, as their responses are solely based on believing in your flawed statement. It seems as though the assumption is that the employee is automatically at fault, while you have conveniently omitted three crucial points to be considered in your straightforward academic-style question, namely:
(1) If the Team Leader (TL) is working the night shift, who supervises the employee's work if they are not working alongside the TL during their shift?
(2) How often have you observed the employee engaging in casual conversations, and in what context?
(3) Is the employee fulfilling their duties and responsibilities adequately?
If the employee is performing well, it raises the question of why you would want to intervene in the team leader's management.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
(1) If the Team Leader (TL) is working the night shift, who supervises the employee's work if they are not working alongside the TL during their shift?
(2) How often have you observed the employee engaging in casual conversations, and in what context?
(3) Is the employee fulfilling their duties and responsibilities adequately?
If the employee is performing well, it raises the question of why you would want to intervene in the team leader's management.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In the first place, why do employees need to be micromanaged? Is there any loss to personal productivity, or is it impacting the ambiance? What is the work culture? Honestly, I am surprised to note these natural human traits as real issues in the workplace.
Regards,
Ramesh
HR Management Trainer
+971-50-2879772
From United Arab Emirates, Dubai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
Ramesh
HR Management Trainer
+971-50-2879772
From United Arab Emirates, Dubai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. P.S. Dhingra and Ramesh,
Mr. Dhingra, you have written, "If the employee is performing well, a question arises, why would you like to interfere in the regime of the team leader?"
Ramesh, you have written, "In the first place, why do employees need to be micromanaged?"
In my earlier posts, I have raised the productivity of the team members as well as that of the entire team. We are yet to receive a reply on that. For a while, let us imagine that the Team Member's performance is "Very Good" or above. Nevertheless, what matters is others' performance as well. They could be disturbing others. Secondly, if every employee starts exhibiting his/her natural human traits at the workplace, then the entire company culture will go haywire. If HR does not intervene to maintain a culture of discipline, then who else will intervene? A company is nothing but a group of people coming together and working for some cause. To work together, this group must adhere to certain rules and regulations, and some members' basic human traits cannot be allowed to override the rules. If we allow this override, the company will crumble in no time!
Employees are paid for spending a certain number of hours at the workplace. Therefore, this time belongs to the company and not to the employees. Why did that employee in question feel it was appropriate to pass his time gossiping rather than volunteering for extra work?
Secondly, it is the duty of HR to inform the Team Leader of what is happening in his absence. What is wrong if HR intervenes due to the loss of the company's time? Good or bad, HR must keep a close watch on the company's affairs.
I know a few IT companies where the entire workload is delegated to the junior-most members, and Team Leaders or Project Leaders spend time in the stock market or real estate market. Juniors work well past midnight but cannot complain against their superiors for fear of losing their jobs. Since it is an internal matter of the team, HR does not intervene. Many times, HR is blissfully unaware of what's happening. This imbalance has been ongoing for years or even decades. Do you accept this serious work imbalance caused by the impersonal attitude of HR?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Mr. Dhingra, you have written, "If the employee is performing well, a question arises, why would you like to interfere in the regime of the team leader?"
Ramesh, you have written, "In the first place, why do employees need to be micromanaged?"
In my earlier posts, I have raised the productivity of the team members as well as that of the entire team. We are yet to receive a reply on that. For a while, let us imagine that the Team Member's performance is "Very Good" or above. Nevertheless, what matters is others' performance as well. They could be disturbing others. Secondly, if every employee starts exhibiting his/her natural human traits at the workplace, then the entire company culture will go haywire. If HR does not intervene to maintain a culture of discipline, then who else will intervene? A company is nothing but a group of people coming together and working for some cause. To work together, this group must adhere to certain rules and regulations, and some members' basic human traits cannot be allowed to override the rules. If we allow this override, the company will crumble in no time!
Employees are paid for spending a certain number of hours at the workplace. Therefore, this time belongs to the company and not to the employees. Why did that employee in question feel it was appropriate to pass his time gossiping rather than volunteering for extra work?
Secondly, it is the duty of HR to inform the Team Leader of what is happening in his absence. What is wrong if HR intervenes due to the loss of the company's time? Good or bad, HR must keep a close watch on the company's affairs.
I know a few IT companies where the entire workload is delegated to the junior-most members, and Team Leaders or Project Leaders spend time in the stock market or real estate market. Juniors work well past midnight but cannot complain against their superiors for fear of losing their jobs. Since it is an internal matter of the team, HR does not intervene. Many times, HR is blissfully unaware of what's happening. This imbalance has been ongoing for years or even decades. Do you accept this serious work imbalance caused by the impersonal attitude of HR?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dinesh ji, I have not raised any question on your reply. But when the author speaks that, "that TL will be working in the night shift whereas team members work in a split shift, as TL is not there, he uses this opportunity to chit-chat," that clearly indicates that his company is a call center-like organization. Most of the work, probably from the USA or European countries, is done at night. Moreover, in lax periods, if there is no work, the employee's mouth cannot be taped to keep himself quiet by the wishes of HR. The author has not come forward with his clarification on the queries raised so far. Here, keeping the employee without any supervision or extra staffing in slack hours speaks either about mismanagement on the part of HR or the author of the query has some vendetta against the employee and may be wishing to harm the interest of the employee through his TL. That is why I have raised the question about the deficiency in his query.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Mr. Dinesh,
Chatting at work is a basic privilege that is reasonable, although not a right. You're not paying employees to chat, but that doesn't mean you can completely prohibit them from doing so during work hours. You are allowed to draw the line but not restrict.
Regards,
Ramesh
HR Management Trainer
+971-50-2879772
From United Arab Emirates, Dubai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Chatting at work is a basic privilege that is reasonable, although not a right. You're not paying employees to chat, but that doesn't mean you can completely prohibit them from doing so during work hours. You are allowed to draw the line but not restrict.
Regards,
Ramesh
HR Management Trainer
+971-50-2879772
From United Arab Emirates, Dubai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.