From time to time, our company takes few students in their final MCA and BTech year on six months internship training as part of their degree program. We have letters from the concerned colleges for each individual stating that as part of the MCA /BTech degree the students are required to undergo six months of full-time internship training in a company during the final year of their degree. Our company pays a stipend of Rs. 6000/- to 6500/- per month to such interns. The EPF office is insisting that PF is applicable on the stipend being paid to these students. This does not seems correct.
I request PF experts to please shed more light on the matter.
- I Yadav
From India, Delhi
I request PF experts to please shed more light on the matter.
- I Yadav
From India, Delhi
As per Provident Fund Act only apprentices engaged through Related Instruction Centres under the Apprentice Act, 1961, and those engaged as per certified Standing Orders of the company are excluded from coverage. Regarding interns, there is no separate ruling given either in the Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act or in any judgement. However, you can defend by saying that they are not 'employed' but are doing their 'project which is mandatory as per their curriculum for award of their degree/ diploma' and request to drop the proceedings/ demand. Any way you will get an opportunity to be represented u/s 7A of the Act and in that hearing you can present your views and categorically say that "if we are asked to give coverage to these trainees, no body will give opportunities such project trainees and finally the Universities will have to find out a solution"
In fact I had experienced a similar observation by an ESI Inspector and when I contented as above, they dropped it. But I didn't book the allowances to project trainees under the head 'stipend' but as Conveyance under the Training and Development Expenses.
Anyway, defend the directions of the EPFO and make others like students community, University, also involved in the matter. Do not pay the amount as demanded.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
4248In fact I had experienced a similar observation by an ESI Inspector and when I contented as above, they dropped it. But I didn't book the allowances to project trainees under the head 'stipend' but as Conveyance under the Training and Development Expenses.
Anyway, defend the directions of the EPFO and make others like students community, University, also involved in the matter. Do not pay the amount as demanded.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Share saving calculation.xls
5 How to submit the entries for Talent Share 2008.jpg