Sir,
The decision taken by ESIC Headquarters was made only after all the paperwork regarding myself was provided by the SRO in Surat as a reference. They have now accepted the decision, and it will be beneficial for them in further proceedings. I will now approach my employer.
Rahim Pardewala
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
The decision taken by ESIC Headquarters was made only after all the paperwork regarding myself was provided by the SRO in Surat as a reference. They have now accepted the decision, and it will be beneficial for them in further proceedings. I will now approach my employer.
Rahim Pardewala
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sir, I am attaching the letter received from SRO, Surat Rahim Pardewala
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sir, I feel it very encouraging that you are pursuing your case. Hope, in the end, you will get your entitlement as per law and procedure laid down in the Act.
From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
965From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sir,
Now I feel very sorry for the ESIC, whose senior persons are not ready to accept the reply of ESIC HR. In my case, my employer approached two ESIC Regional offices, i.e., Jaipur and Udaipur, with the reply from ESIC HR for my disability benefit. However, the Director's response was so dismissive, stating that this benefit is only for new employees. It is truly disheartening. I kindly request all seniors to guide me further.
Thank you.
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Now I feel very sorry for the ESIC, whose senior persons are not ready to accept the reply of ESIC HR. In my case, my employer approached two ESIC Regional offices, i.e., Jaipur and Udaipur, with the reply from ESIC HR for my disability benefit. However, the Director's response was so dismissive, stating that this benefit is only for new employees. It is truly disheartening. I kindly request all seniors to guide me further.
Thank you.
From India, Ahmedabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
WC? Is it Workmen's Compensation? And is it mandatory in ESI-implemented areas?
If you are asking whether the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act will apply to employees covered under the ESI Act, the answer is that for employees covered under ESI schemes, the provisions of the Employees' Compensation Act will not apply. Instead, the ESI Corporation will take care of the employer's liability.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If you are asking whether the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act will apply to employees covered under the ESI Act, the answer is that for employees covered under ESI schemes, the provisions of the Employees' Compensation Act will not apply. Instead, the ESI Corporation will take care of the employer's liability.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. Sir, the name of WC, i.e., the Workmen's Compensation Act, has been changed to the Employees' Compensation Act. Hope you will refer to the relevant Act as amended.
2. The Employees' Compensation Act is applicable to all types of industries/factories as defined in the said Act. However, the scope of coverage of the ESI Act, 1948, is restricted to the implemented areas, and in said units, it is applicable in respect of the employees who fall within the coverage limit of the wage ceiling (which is presently Rs. 21,000 per month).
3. In factories/establishments covered under both the Employees' Compensation Act and the ESI Act, 1948, injured employees can claim compensation (Permanent Disablement or Temporary Disablement Benefit) only under the provisions of the ESI Act, 1948. However, in case the injured employee is not covered under the ESI Act, 1948, the principal employer is liable under the Employees' Compensation Act.
From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
2. The Employees' Compensation Act is applicable to all types of industries/factories as defined in the said Act. However, the scope of coverage of the ESI Act, 1948, is restricted to the implemented areas, and in said units, it is applicable in respect of the employees who fall within the coverage limit of the wage ceiling (which is presently Rs. 21,000 per month).
3. In factories/establishments covered under both the Employees' Compensation Act and the ESI Act, 1948, injured employees can claim compensation (Permanent Disablement or Temporary Disablement Benefit) only under the provisions of the ESI Act, 1948. However, in case the injured employee is not covered under the ESI Act, 1948, the principal employer is liable under the Employees' Compensation Act.
From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Today, I was reading through this old thread and was suddenly disturbed by post #15 from our anonymous friend. This post does not pertain to the current discussion in progress on this thread.
Considering the forum administration's expertise in deleting posts, why are such posts not being removed? In the past, almost 200 of my posts have been deleted, even though they were relevant and valuable, which is quite surprising.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Considering the forum administration's expertise in deleting posts, why are such posts not being removed? In the past, almost 200 of my posts have been deleted, even though they were relevant and valuable, which is quite surprising.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Friends,
In fact, I'm confused now due to so many things in my mind. I feel we are making a mistake somewhere in understanding the issue. I think there are two issues here. One is the pension for a disabled person (employment injury), and the other is an incentive for an employer to employ a disabled person. It came to my attention recently, if I'm not wrong, that the salary ceiling of Rs. 25000 has been removed for availing the incentive. I tried googling but was unable to find out. I need some study in this matter. In the meantime, if someone could shed some light on this matter, it would be appreciated.
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In fact, I'm confused now due to so many things in my mind. I feel we are making a mistake somewhere in understanding the issue. I think there are two issues here. One is the pension for a disabled person (employment injury), and the other is an incentive for an employer to employ a disabled person. It came to my attention recently, if I'm not wrong, that the salary ceiling of Rs. 25000 has been removed for availing the incentive. I tried googling but was unable to find out. I need some study in this matter. In the meantime, if someone could shed some light on this matter, it would be appreciated.
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
ESI COVERAGE ON 1O EMPLOYEE0104201 1.pdf
ESI coverage - Rajasthan 2016.jpg