No Tags Found!

Madhu.T.K
4244

As I said rejecting on the ground that the Maternity Benefits Act does not apply to your organisation and or quoting the ' 12 months preceding the expected date of delivery' is a legal question that you have to decide. If you refer to the ESI Act, it is available only to those who have contributed certain number of days (70 days) in two consecutive contribution periods (that means one year). That means maternity benefit will not be paid to one who has just worked for 70 days (let it be 80 days also)

Section 5(2) of the Act says that:
No woman shall be entitled to maternity benefit unless she has actually worked in an establishment of the employer from whom she claims maternity benefit for a period of not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery.

If the purpose is to give benefits to women employees who have worked for 80 days, then it should have been without the qualifying condition attached to 80 days, ie in 12 months. Moreover, it is like " NO woman is ENTITLED to get it if she has not worked at least for 80 days in 12 months immediately preceding the date of delivery. That means a woman employee who has been in service for many years shall not be entitled to get maternity benefits if she had not worked for 80 days in the 12 months immediately preceding the child birth. That clearly says that it is not the total length of service but the service in 12 months just before the child birth that is important.

Further reasoning and interpretations, you may make.

From India, Kannur
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.