No Tags Found!

A person who is appointed temporarily is to be understood to mean that he is appointed against a post which may not be having a permanent nature, i.e., a lien would not be created against the said post. As and when the post becomes permanent under the budget, the person concerned holding the said post would be entitled to be confirmed on the said post and a lien is created against the said post
Please provide judgements regarding above mentioned matter.
Any Dopt ( Rules ,instructions,orders ,notification)

From India, Ludhiana
KK!HR
1536

There was the famous 'Uma Devi Judgement' which was coming in the way but recently there was the news that "'Uma Devi' Judgment Can't Be Used To Justify Exploitative Engagements : Supreme Court Allows Regularisation Of Long-Serving Daily Wagers.
The Supreme Court recently criticized the practice of public institutions hiring workers on daily wages (temporary contracts) to avoid providing them with permanent benefits. The Court reaffirmed that long-serving temporary workers appointed to sanctioned positions cannot be denied regularization simply because their initial appointments were temporary."
The judgement is very recent and pronounced by Justices Vikram Nath & Prasanna B Varele. (report is of 4th Feb'25. Try to get hold of this judgement. n

From India, Mumbai
Dear,
In business there exist temporary requirement of man power for few months and for year or two and the posts ceased to exist. In such conditions persons can be hired for such period in contract. There are many establishments continue the show because the position is of permanent but showcasing as temporary.

From India, Mumbai
What is the context of this query? Does the posting relate to employment in public service?
From India, Kochi
In a 2022 judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled that "equal pay for equal work" is a constitutional goal, but not a fundamental right. The court also ruled that pay parity can't be claimed as an enforceable right, except in certain cases. [1, 2, 3]
Key takeaways [4]

• The court ruled that the government can classify employees based on their qualifications, responsibilities, and duties. [4]
• The court ruled that if the classification is rational and has a clear objective, then the government can prescribe different pay scales. [4]
• The court ruled that pay parity can't be claimed as an enforceable right, unless the competent authority has decided to equate two posts. [3]

Background [5]
The doctrine of equal pay for equal work is a concept of paying people fairly based on the work they do, regardless of their gender, caste, religion, sex, or marital status. [5]
In India, the gender pay gap is high. The World Inequality Report 2022 found that in 2020, women received only about 18% of total labor income, which is the lowest in the world. [5]

From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals. CiteHR connects professionals facing similar challenges, leveraging a vast knowledge base (100K+ downloads, 150K+ discussions) and targeted emails to engage experts in solving issues.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.