Anonymous
1

Hello Everyone!!

Recently, one of our employees resigned and requested early release on the grounds that she is the only daughter looking after her sick mother. We accepted her resignation verbally, giving her Last Working Day (LWD) as 7th March. However, we received the Background Verification (BGV) report two days after she left the company.

In this situation, can the company take any action against her for providing a fake reason to be relieved? When discussing this with the employee, she mentioned that she was not aware she would be selected by another company and was completely unaware of the BGV process.

The management has now deemed her as absconded due to the alleged fake reason, but she is not willing to accept it. Could you please suggest how to handle this case?

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi,

The employee was officially relieved based on her request, whether genuine or fake. After the employee was properly relieved, how did the employer interpret her departure as leaving without information? This is unfair. You may choose not to consider her for re-employment, which is the maximum you can do, or in the worst case, you may mention the facts in the background verification (BGV) process, but I wouldn't suggest it.

From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I fully agree with Lakshmi Narayan; the company should not have gone for a background verification. If an employee has a reason to leave your organization, then let her leave. You are not a detective to find out whether there was any genuine reason for her departure. You should have acted in good faith. After relieving her, how can you declare that she is absconding? Do you know the actual meaning of absconding? If she has been absent without leave and if she has not been responding to your calls or letters, you can declare her as having left the job or use the word "abandoned" the employment. But you cannot use absconding. She can very well challenge this remark, saying that the term used by you has caused stigma. Again, HR can conduct background verification to determine whether an employee joining is a fit for you, but you are not a detective investigating any criminal background.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Mate,

Thanks for your response! The employee had not been provided with any mail confirmation mentioning her Last Working Day (LWD). Even though there was a significant need for her support within the team, taking into account her personal circumstances supporting her parents, the company agreed to release her early without requiring her to serve a notice period, as she consistently expressed her desire to be relieved. Furthermore, the company received her Background Verification (BGV) for another company immediately after her last day.

Based on this, the company has requested her to complete the notice period, which the employee was not willing to do.

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Madhu,

Thanks for your suggestion! I just have one concern. When a company decides to terminate an employee based on a false reason to join another company, is that not illegal? If the company finds out about this through background verification, where the employee has informed the new company that they left for a better opportunity, can the company not state that the reason is invalid and provide the actual reason?

Please suggest what is best for me to do in this scenario as an HR professional, as I have to address both management and the employee.

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Ms. Pramila, it is true that her presence was very much required, but you decided to relieve her. It may also be true that she should have opted for another opportunity because the other opportunity would give her more access to her parents and take care of them. Now, when you declare that she is 'absconding', rather abandoned the job, will you get the work done? She may even go to the Labour department and get the assistance of the law protecting an employee. A good labour law enforcement officer shall ask just one question, "How can you make an employee stay back once he/she has resigned?" If the Labour officer asks for a copy of the Certified Standing Orders where it is mentioned that an employee of this category should give notice to the company, will you be able to provide it? Please remember that there is nothing under any Labour law that an employee should serve notice. All that you can do is spoil the career of an employee by putting negative remarks on the background verification. By doing so, what is your gain? If an employee is not interested in working with you, let them go.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Madhu,

I think you have mistaken my concern. I have mentioned that we received a BGV from her joining company immediately after the employee left the organization. We have not sent any BGV from our side.

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Madhu, Thanks for your suggestions and time in sorting this issue!!
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I think my last post came before I noticed your reply to my first comment. Let me say that employee-employer relationships are mandated by certain laws. No company will be totally compliant with regard to labor laws also. Hence, it is very important that unnecessary situations which may invite the law-enforcing officers to come and verify the records should not be invited. As I said, when there is no law that says an employee should give notice to leave a company, how can we insist an employee to serve notice? I don't know what the required notice is. Even from the employer's side, the notice to terminate an employee is one month. There are companies who have framed provisions that an employee should give three months' notice! That is illegal. Yes, if you have standing orders certified by the appropriate authority, in which it is mentioned that notice is required to be given, then it is binding. I don't think that you have a standing order. In respect of managers also, your stand is right. But an employee who has no reportee under him/her is only a workman even though he is getting lakhs of rupees as salary and he has a fancy designation like manager/Sr. Manager.

Coming to the situation, I would say that the employee has already decided to leave. No employee will give the right reason for leaving, I would say. It shall be a better opportunity, a better place of work, access to family, and many reasons. In short, the reason would be simply: she does not want to work with us. Then leave her. Why should we go behind her? What is the gain that we get from going behind her? Nothing.

From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Madhu!!

Rightly said!! We cannot hold an employee who has mentally decided not to work in any organization, no matter what the reason may be.

Thank you for taking the time and providing your insights on my concern!!

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.