Learned members, I had a question pertaining to 'contract workers' engaged by a principal employer through a contractor and their EPF contributions. I am of the understanding that the EPF contribution is to be made by the contractor (whereby the ultimate responsibility to ensure such payment lies with the principal employer) as per para 30 of the EPF Scheme.
The impugned contract between the contractor and the principal employer expressly mentions that the employees engaged by the principal employer are the employees of the contractor. It provides the salary breakdown (mentioning various components) and also mentions that the principal employer shall provide the EPF amount to the contractor. Whether such a contract, which shows that the principal employer is giving EPF contributions to the contractor, is illegal or otherwise unsustainable?
The contractor received some benefits under the PMRPY Scheme, and subsequently, the principal employer is seeking reimbursement. It would be very helpful if you could provide any legal provisions or any precedent on the same.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
The impugned contract between the contractor and the principal employer expressly mentions that the employees engaged by the principal employer are the employees of the contractor. It provides the salary breakdown (mentioning various components) and also mentions that the principal employer shall provide the EPF amount to the contractor. Whether such a contract, which shows that the principal employer is giving EPF contributions to the contractor, is illegal or otherwise unsustainable?
The contractor received some benefits under the PMRPY Scheme, and subsequently, the principal employer is seeking reimbursement. It would be very helpful if you could provide any legal provisions or any precedent on the same.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Since you yourself mentioned in your query that the contract between the principal employer and the contractor was well written, there is no question of the principal employer asking any amount that the contractor has received or refunded back under any scheme. Conversely, if the principal employer insists on asking for that amount back, then the contract is likely to be declared as merely a 'sham,' and the principal employer may be held to be the actual employer of the contract labor. The principal employer cannot even ask for it back under any provision of law.
If he asks, then there are other ways to react. I hope I have answered your query.
From India, Faridabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
56If he asks, then there are other ways to react. I hope I have answered your query.
From India, Faridabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.