In todays world where multiskilling is becoming rampant.

A technical manager knows how to get the work done through his subordinates, he can learn a lot of management through books and degrees and experience. And today people understand what is expected of them by the company, and they can coordinate with each other, mutually discuss and solve problems.

Today wherein everyone is intelligent, educated and knows what is expected of him from the company would do his work with full motivation equivalent to the pay / environment he receives. This behaviour is easily noticeable to his supervisor if he is somewhat dull / low in work and can be talked and corrected by the supervisor.

So to do all these things there is no need of a HR Dept and so called special HR people.

Zats what I think.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Hanuma,

Anyone can frame a vision ,, and see that it is achieved.

For that I dont feel a need of a HR Department is there.

Be it any industry , any size, there needs to be a good and powerful person who can motivate and get the things done, and that person necessarily need not be THE HR DEPT.

WE WORK WITHOUT HR DEPARTMENT..

AND WE DONT FEEL THE NEED ,, TO SOME EXTENT..

WHAT MORE TO SAY...

....

............

....

....

...........

.....

......................

............................

From India, Pune
Hanuma
See my earlier postings. These should explain the reason why there is the necessity for a separate HR department.
You are a technical professional in an academic institute. When you enter industry, you will understand the need for a separate HR presence.
Jeroo

From India, Mumbai
Dear All,

HR is a crucial part of any organization...some have it clearly made up...others "cover" this department within other department. but once an organization grows, it has to have it....it's true that some companies outsource it, so they may not physically have it. many companies are doing this these days.

If other mean that it's costlier to have HR than to simply ask somebody else do it, then may be...but if they are speaking in the truest sense then you have to have HR...you may outsource it to outside...but you still have it.

After all, you are getting your Human Resource from somewhere..and you HAVE to manage it. thus you have to have HR one way or another.

You have to be clear as to what HR is intended for...and how today's technology and outsourcing world have changed...and how cost cuts are a priority these days....and of course the growing need to invest in people and make their efforts more effective (which the HR is partly responsible for)...so once you understand all these, then you set your priority as to whether you want to have an in-house HR or simply have it outsourced.

It's a classic case study.......

Regards,

HASSAN

From Pakistan, Islamabad
Not really.
Many of the most important HR functions relate to inter-personal dialogues, where such interaction cannot possibly be delegated to outside sources who have no idea of what is required or the conditions prevailing at any given time in the company.
Jeroo

From India, Mumbai
If a situation is that "the Outside Company itself is their HR Department" thats the Logic we used and been practicing the same from past 5.5 yrs and this concept is Copyrighted.. you can call Husys @ 040-65195632 on how we are able to proove that this cponcept works better than the Individual HR been in the company.
From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.