Dear Mr NASHBRAMHALL
and all members/readers
With reference to query of NASHBRAMHALL I with all humility and due regard to everyone\'s acumen, wish to suggest my view point that \"the draft posted by me is a safeguard against the ex employees who were terminated for misconduct.\" Exceptions are always there and will always be there, that is why law is a matter of continuous review and amendment. My suggested draft is a matter to be considered with a positive spirit and make changes according to your requirement. If Members feel there is any defect, I would pray for an amended draft that can be shared on citehr.
With due respect and in all humility,
C.M.Lal Srivastava

From India, New Delhi
Mr Srivastava, how can you deter your employees from iinteracting with an outsider in view of availability of so many means of communication at the workplace and out side unless it pertains to transfer of classified information related with the business? The circular, therefore, is not enforceable either in practice or in law.
s.k.johri

From India, Delhi
Dear Mr Payal

Generally, the employers do not want to see that their existing employees should not have any touch with their ex-employees very particularly whose services are terminated on disciplinary ground. In their opinion that these ex-employees may likely to spoil good environment of their office by polluting the minds of existing employees. In my opinion, these type of thinking or apprehensions on part of the employers is ridiculous and cannot said to be good for any one. Why because, now a days we cannot resist or insist any person from passing the information from one place to another or from one person to another as the means of communication may be in different forms. Mail, cell and phone etc.

Every organization is having its own service rules or standing orders covering the subject under reference and acts of misconduct might have been clearly defined. If any employee who is alleged to have committed any misconduct could be punished by invoking relevant service rule or standing order as the case may be.Mere getting touch with ex-employee by existing employee cannot be termed as bad until and unless such interaction or sharing of views found to be detrimental to the interest of employers business.So this kind of circular could not be issued and it likely to be leads to further complications

Regards

NVRao

From India, Hyderabad
Dear All Counterpart Members and Seniors,
With due respect and apology to all I may take an opportunity in all humility to prayerfully express that opinions have been expressed with lots of qualifying words and phrases, but the soul and spirit of the matter remains untouched and no modified draft posted as requested. It is also to note that the member, Ms Payal, who started the discussion, has not given any feedback.
In view of the present position I wish to place a full stop for myself in the matter with my sincere thanks to all counterpart members and seniors who have posted good views and given a guiding principle to take action under the prevailing disciplinary rules.
Thanking all.
Srivastava

From India, New Delhi
it is better to communicate such issues through face to face communication meetings in small groups rather than sending a written circular. It is more important that the employees understand the reason behind such communication and also have chance to clarify their doubts through Q & A sessions after face to face meetings.
From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.