No Tags Found!

pca
1444

Dear friends,
I am attaching an interesting judgement delivered by Gujarat High Court in which the court has held that part time employee is not excluded from the definition of 'workman' under Industrial Disputes Act and accordingly he could also enjoy the benefits applicable to a workman. Whether he is workman or not is a mixed question of law and fact. It indirectly also accepts the concept of dual employment at the same time.
Thanks

From India, Malappuram
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf Gujarat High Court on part-time employee 23.11.2007.pdf (132.9 KB, 357 views)

v.harikrishnan
169

Dear All
In CASE NO Appeal (civil) 7986 of 2004 in which the PETITIONER is the General Manager, Indian Overseas Bank and in which the RESPONDENT was the Workmen, All India Overseas Bank Employees Union the Honourable Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated 10/03/2006 had held that part time gold appraisers are workmen as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. The Bench which decided the issue consisted of their Lordships ARIJIT PASAYAT & ARUN KUMAR. The judgment is available in the website of the Honourable Supreme Court of India.
With regards

From India, Madras
chirag0006
22

Dear All, I want to know who are covered as part time workers in ID Act? Regards, Chirag Parekh
From India, Mumbai
v.harikrishnan
169

"Workmen" as defined under the Industrial disputes Act even though they are "part time workemen" are covered by the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. With regards
From India, Madras
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.