In one of our units in Chennai, the contract workmen are represented by a trade union. The contractor and the said union enter into periodical settlements providing for wage increases and other benefits. For the past few years, the settlement of wages has not been resolved, and the contract workmen are indulging in a strike even after the written advice by the Joint Labor Commissioner to withdraw the strike. The union has not called off the strike. On the other side, the failure report for the demand from 2018-2022 is awaiting adjudication (it is signed by the Government for adjudication). Fresh demands for the period of 2018-2022 have also not been concluded due to the obstinate attitude of the union.
The management has declared a lockout of its establishment due to industrial unrest just outside the gate and is practically facing other issues also due to the standstill of allied activities. However, the management has decided to pay salaries and wages to its employees even for this lockout period.
Now, my questions are:
- Whether the management can terminate the contract at this time? I would like to clarify that the contractor does not have any contract with any other establishment.
- Whether the Government authority can pass an order to pay the contract workmen?
- Whether, as a principal employee, we should attend the conciliation meeting? We have attended one meeting as a second party and clarified our views.
I would be happy to receive the expert's view on the same.
With Regards,
Ranjan Kumar Dixit
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
2The management has declared a lockout of its establishment due to industrial unrest just outside the gate and is practically facing other issues also due to the standstill of allied activities. However, the management has decided to pay salaries and wages to its employees even for this lockout period.
Now, my questions are:
- Whether the management can terminate the contract at this time? I would like to clarify that the contractor does not have any contract with any other establishment.
- Whether the Government authority can pass an order to pay the contract workmen?
- Whether, as a principal employee, we should attend the conciliation meeting? We have attended one meeting as a second party and clarified our views.
I would be happy to receive the expert's view on the same.
With Regards,
Ranjan Kumar Dixit
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Your queries are answered below:
1. Whether management can terminate the contract as of now? You are entitled to terminate the contract as per the agreed contract terms. Obviously, there is a breach of contract and as a consequence, you can terminate the contract. The contractor employees cannot challenge the contract termination as they are not a party to the contract.
2. Whether Government authority can pass an order to pay for contract workmen? They may do so out of political compulsion, but you can challenge it before the High Court and obtain a favorable interim order against it.
3. Whether being a principal employee we should attend the conciliation meeting? Having made your stand clear, it is better to stay away from the conciliation meeting. Give a written reply to this effect if you have been invited for the meeting. The conciliation officer, in his quest to find a settlement, would force you to concede unnecessarily. At the same time, have a clear understanding with the contractor on what he can agree with and what he should disagree with, totally as well as partially. However, keep in touch with the conciliation officer otherwise and give your constructive suggestions to resolve the differences.
For the betterment of the industry, keep the doors open for a mutually acceptable solution rather than a confrontation to the hilt approach.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. Whether management can terminate the contract as of now? You are entitled to terminate the contract as per the agreed contract terms. Obviously, there is a breach of contract and as a consequence, you can terminate the contract. The contractor employees cannot challenge the contract termination as they are not a party to the contract.
2. Whether Government authority can pass an order to pay for contract workmen? They may do so out of political compulsion, but you can challenge it before the High Court and obtain a favorable interim order against it.
3. Whether being a principal employee we should attend the conciliation meeting? Having made your stand clear, it is better to stay away from the conciliation meeting. Give a written reply to this effect if you have been invited for the meeting. The conciliation officer, in his quest to find a settlement, would force you to concede unnecessarily. At the same time, have a clear understanding with the contractor on what he can agree with and what he should disagree with, totally as well as partially. However, keep in touch with the conciliation officer otherwise and give your constructive suggestions to resolve the differences.
For the betterment of the industry, keep the doors open for a mutually acceptable solution rather than a confrontation to the hilt approach.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks for your prompt reply further I will prefer more views keeping in view of gravity of the situation Regards Ranjan Ku Dixit
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I think the view expressed by KK is more than enough, and there cannot be any different view on it. So long as the contract is genuine, the dispute is between the contractor and his workmen. If the assigned work is disrupted, the contract can be terminated. However, this will create a law and order issue in the area that has to be tackled carefully. The workers know that they have no right to disrupt the operations of the principal employer, but they also know that a solution will be found only when there is disturbance to the public.
I would like to invite Umakanthan Sir, who had handled such kinds of issues in Tamil Nadu itself as a conciliation officer when he was in service, to share his views as well.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I would like to invite Umakanthan Sir, who had handled such kinds of issues in Tamil Nadu itself as a conciliation officer when he was in service, to share his views as well.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
With reference to the above, it is to be noted that due to a strike-lockout, we have not processed the wage bill of the contractor. As a result, the contractor has not paid wages to his workmen. We have issued a notice to the contractor, with a copy to the conciliation officer, stating that since bills and attendance are verified from the unit itself, under the current situation, we would neither be able to reimburse nor be able to pay the wages of the contract workmen.
However, our staff's and workmen's salaries are being prepared by the corporate office based on the electronic attendance system, hence they have been paid. Now, the conciliation officer of that area is pressuring the contractor and principal employer to pay the wages for the period during which the work was done. Or are we legally obligated to pay out the wages even during a strike/lockout? (In my opinion, we should pay once the plant is operational.)
Can they compel us under the current circumstances, considering if there is indeed a practical issue present?
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
However, our staff's and workmen's salaries are being prepared by the corporate office based on the electronic attendance system, hence they have been paid. Now, the conciliation officer of that area is pressuring the contractor and principal employer to pay the wages for the period during which the work was done. Or are we legally obligated to pay out the wages even during a strike/lockout? (In my opinion, we should pay once the plant is operational.)
Can they compel us under the current circumstances, considering if there is indeed a practical issue present?
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
For the period the laborers worked, you cannot forfeit or withhold any salary on the grounds that their continued service is not available. Nonpayment of wages pertaining to the period the workers worked is illegal. Therefore, you should pay the bill for that period.
For the period the workers have not worked, obviously, since you have not received any service, no payment needs to be made.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
For the period the workers have not worked, obviously, since you have not received any service, no payment needs to be made.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Can we engage a new contractor at this point in time while conciliation is ongoing?
Can the new contractor mobilize and engage willing workers in his role?
Do the old workers have to resign and join the new contractor, or can they be appointed by the new contractor without resigning?
Regards
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Can the new contractor mobilize and engage willing workers in his role?
Do the old workers have to resign and join the new contractor, or can they be appointed by the new contractor without resigning?
Regards
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
When a conciliation is ongoing, it is better to avoid placing another contractor and workmen in the same location, as it could disrupt the situation and potentially escalate into a law and order issue in the area. Legally, a principal employer can do so, but I don't believe it is practical. The old workers resigning from the contractor's employment and joining a new contractor could further exacerbate the situation. It is advisable to expedite hearings and facilitate faster conciliation.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Conciliation is happening on a day-to-day basis, but the union is not backing down, and their demands seem illogical. They are currently receiving compensation equivalent to that of permanent employees. Therefore, in my opinion, the only viable option is to hire a new contractor. If you have any suggestions on how to resolve this situation, please inform us.
Regards
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
You may discuss with the conciliation officer and decide. The matter being referred for adjudication, appointing a new contractor will not be feasible. Moreover, striking the workers will not permit the new workers to enter the premises; they will create a law and order issue. Therefore, discuss the issue with the JLC and proceed.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.