After confirmation of the job offer, you will serve the company for a minimum of two years. During these two years, your services shall be terminable by either side by giving twelve months' notice or salary in lieu thereof. Thereafter, your service will be terminable by either side by giving three months' notice or basic salary in lieu thereof.
From India, Dehra Dun
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
From India, Dehra Dun
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi,
It is an act of directly compelling you to serve for two years after confirmation. The separation clause is also very high, i.e., 12 months, although the employer is willing to give 12 months.
If you have not accepted the offer so far, please don't go for it.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1015It is an act of directly compelling you to serve for two years after confirmation. The separation clause is also very high, i.e., 12 months, although the employer is willing to give 12 months.
If you have not accepted the offer so far, please don't go for it.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In general notice period should not be more than 90 days. It would be better to look for an other employment before gets confirmed.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The HR Manager can write anything in the appointment order. When the post is such that a lot of candidates are available in the market and the labor is highly elastic, they can put any condition. I am afraid will the same be there in the appointment order of a position which is inelastic or the availability is very limited? No. Therefore, when the employee is on the accepting side, whether to accept it or not is the main question. If you need a job, you will accept it. If you are highly employable, certainly, you will refuse to accept the conditions mentioned in the offer and reject it. The choice is yours.
If the position is not a managerial position, these conditions of service are against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. The ID Act provides for conditions to be followed to terminate an employee/workman, but nowhere in the Act is it mentioned that an employee should give notice if he wants to leave the company. Therefore, in the case of an employee who does not have any functional authority of a supervisor, these conditions of service can be totally ignored, and no action can be taken by the employer if he violates it. Of course, a manager will not get the protection of law, and as such, accepting it or rejecting it is his own decision.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If the position is not a managerial position, these conditions of service are against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. The ID Act provides for conditions to be followed to terminate an employee/workman, but nowhere in the Act is it mentioned that an employee should give notice if he wants to leave the company. Therefore, in the case of an employee who does not have any functional authority of a supervisor, these conditions of service can be totally ignored, and no action can be taken by the employer if he violates it. Of course, a manager will not get the protection of law, and as such, accepting it or rejecting it is his own decision.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.