As per the new wage code, the basic should be 50% of the total salary. So in implementing the same, there is a gap in gratuity calculation as there is a difference between the current basic salary and the revised basic salary. The difference is being recovered from employees by adjusting leaves, encashing leaves, or through increments.
Is it a fair practice as employees are at a great loss since they are losing their money? The government should look into this matter.
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Is it a fair practice as employees are at a great loss since they are losing their money? The government should look into this matter.
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Tushar,
The point you have raised is not clear to me.
First, the Code on Wages, 2019 has not yet been enforced.
Second, has your organization started restructuring the existing salary of your employees as per sec. 2(y) of the Code in anticipation of its enforcement? If so, what is the current cadre-wise componential structure and the percentage of each component to the gross wages/salary payable at the end of the wage period?
Third, even if you keep your salary structure as it is after the Code comes into force, if the proportion of the excluded components exceeds 50% of the gross salary payable, the excess should be automatically added to the basic for the calculation of gratuity and other indirect benefits. Then how comes the question of recovery from the employees?
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
6185The point you have raised is not clear to me.
First, the Code on Wages, 2019 has not yet been enforced.
Second, has your organization started restructuring the existing salary of your employees as per sec. 2(y) of the Code in anticipation of its enforcement? If so, what is the current cadre-wise componential structure and the percentage of each component to the gross wages/salary payable at the end of the wage period?
Third, even if you keep your salary structure as it is after the Code comes into force, if the proportion of the excluded components exceeds 50% of the gross salary payable, the excess should be automatically added to the basic for the calculation of gratuity and other indirect benefits. Then how comes the question of recovery from the employees?
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your prompt response.
My point is, suppose any employee's previous basic salary was around 23000 (when the gross salary is about 70000). Now, after the restructuring under the wage code, the basic salary is around 35000.
The gratuity calculation for 10 years when the basic salary is 23000 is 132692 (for the employee continuing service).
The gratuity calculation for 10 years when the basic salary is 35000 is 201923 (for the employee continuing service).
The difference (201923 - 132692 = 69230) is being recovered from employees, which is not under the wage code. This results in a loss for the employees.
This recovery should be stopped. I hope you understand my point.
Regards,
Tushar
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you for your prompt response.
My point is, suppose any employee's previous basic salary was around 23000 (when the gross salary is about 70000). Now, after the restructuring under the wage code, the basic salary is around 35000.
The gratuity calculation for 10 years when the basic salary is 23000 is 132692 (for the employee continuing service).
The gratuity calculation for 10 years when the basic salary is 35000 is 201923 (for the employee continuing service).
The difference (201923 - 132692 = 69230) is being recovered from employees, which is not under the wage code. This results in a loss for the employees.
This recovery should be stopped. I hope you understand my point.
Regards,
Tushar
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Tushar,
The entire episode of proposed recovery starts from the misinterpretation of the term 'wages' as defined u/s 2(y) of the Code on Wages, 2019 which is yet to be enforced.
Perhaps your management adopts the principles of CTC in wage and salary administration. Sorry, given the general parameters to calculate the CTC, it cannot be straight away and completely applied to the concept of wages which is the actual and basic monetary consideration payable under the contract of employment for the services rendered by the employee. This is the employee perspective on the term wages. Since other indirect benefits which are statutorily required to be given or offered by the employer to retain the employees do not form part of the actual wages. If you critically analyze the definition u/s 2(y), you will understand the reasoning behind the demarcation between the included and excluded components enumerated therein. Unfortunately, many employers treat the CTC as the yardstick for the cost of labor though it contains the actual cost of labor, incidental cost of statutory obligations in respect of labor subject to certain conditions and the discretionary cost of retention of labor. If you mess up these things by pooling together to arrive at the overall cost towards employees, certainly you will have to trim the foot to fit the shoes only.
The statutory compulsion of maintaining a certain proportionality between the two sets of components is to curb the exploitation of reducing the actual wages comprising of the basic components from which the excluded items are derived. Therefore, only the components payable with the basic wages at the end of the wage period should be taken into account for the purpose of determining proportionality and not otherwise just because they are payable.
If you notice carefully, gratuity is taken out of the excluded components for the above purpose. That apart statutory gratuity does not require any contribution from the employee. It is a one-time lump sum payable by the employer only on the occasion of termination of employment.
Therefore, the deduction proposed is totally illegal.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The entire episode of proposed recovery starts from the misinterpretation of the term 'wages' as defined u/s 2(y) of the Code on Wages, 2019 which is yet to be enforced.
Perhaps your management adopts the principles of CTC in wage and salary administration. Sorry, given the general parameters to calculate the CTC, it cannot be straight away and completely applied to the concept of wages which is the actual and basic monetary consideration payable under the contract of employment for the services rendered by the employee. This is the employee perspective on the term wages. Since other indirect benefits which are statutorily required to be given or offered by the employer to retain the employees do not form part of the actual wages. If you critically analyze the definition u/s 2(y), you will understand the reasoning behind the demarcation between the included and excluded components enumerated therein. Unfortunately, many employers treat the CTC as the yardstick for the cost of labor though it contains the actual cost of labor, incidental cost of statutory obligations in respect of labor subject to certain conditions and the discretionary cost of retention of labor. If you mess up these things by pooling together to arrive at the overall cost towards employees, certainly you will have to trim the foot to fit the shoes only.
The statutory compulsion of maintaining a certain proportionality between the two sets of components is to curb the exploitation of reducing the actual wages comprising of the basic components from which the excluded items are derived. Therefore, only the components payable with the basic wages at the end of the wage period should be taken into account for the purpose of determining proportionality and not otherwise just because they are payable.
If you notice carefully, gratuity is taken out of the excluded components for the above purpose. That apart statutory gratuity does not require any contribution from the employee. It is a one-time lump sum payable by the employer only on the occasion of termination of employment.
Therefore, the deduction proposed is totally illegal.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear colleague,
Mr. Umakanthan is right. What is not understood is since the new Wage Code is not implemented yet, where is the compulsion to restructure wages in line with that? And if restructuring is implemented of your own volition, and as a result, if a higher amount of gratuity becomes payable, where is the question of recovering an additional amount from him? Sounds ridiculous and patently illegal.
Regards,
Vinayak Nagarkar
HR and Employee Relations Consultant
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Mr. Umakanthan is right. What is not understood is since the new Wage Code is not implemented yet, where is the compulsion to restructure wages in line with that? And if restructuring is implemented of your own volition, and as a result, if a higher amount of gratuity becomes payable, where is the question of recovering an additional amount from him? Sounds ridiculous and patently illegal.
Regards,
Vinayak Nagarkar
HR and Employee Relations Consultant
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Tushar,
In your first post, you mentioned that Basic should be 50% of the Total Salary, but in your subsequent post, you mentioned Basic is 50% of the gross salary (if I am not wrong, you would like to mean 50% of the monthly gross). In my opinion, 50% of the Total salary (which is payable to any employee, including Co's contribution to PF, LTC/LTA, Bonus, OT, etc., that are included but not included in the monthly gross) is the correct interpretation of the definition of wages as per different labor codes (the definition is the same everywhere).
Now, let's address the gratuity issue. It is evident that after restructuring the remuneration package as per the Wage code, Basic will increase, and accordingly, the gratuity amount will also increase. However, as of now and even in the future after the implementation of all labor codes, nowhere is it mentioned that the Gratuity amount is to be paid by deducting from the employee's salary. Many organizations include gratuity as a part of CTC, but that does not mean that gratuity will be deducted from the employee's salary. The most challenging aspect after the implementation of labor codes will be the restructuring of the Remuneration package. Under any circumstances, gratuity will not be paid by deducting from the employee's salary; it would be absolutely illegal.
Thanks & regards,
S K Bandyopadhyay (WB, Howrah) CEO - USD HR Solutions +91 98310 81531 skb@usdhrs.in USD HR Solutions – To Strive towards excellence with effort and integrity
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In your first post, you mentioned that Basic should be 50% of the Total Salary, but in your subsequent post, you mentioned Basic is 50% of the gross salary (if I am not wrong, you would like to mean 50% of the monthly gross). In my opinion, 50% of the Total salary (which is payable to any employee, including Co's contribution to PF, LTC/LTA, Bonus, OT, etc., that are included but not included in the monthly gross) is the correct interpretation of the definition of wages as per different labor codes (the definition is the same everywhere).
Now, let's address the gratuity issue. It is evident that after restructuring the remuneration package as per the Wage code, Basic will increase, and accordingly, the gratuity amount will also increase. However, as of now and even in the future after the implementation of all labor codes, nowhere is it mentioned that the Gratuity amount is to be paid by deducting from the employee's salary. Many organizations include gratuity as a part of CTC, but that does not mean that gratuity will be deducted from the employee's salary. The most challenging aspect after the implementation of labor codes will be the restructuring of the Remuneration package. Under any circumstances, gratuity will not be paid by deducting from the employee's salary; it would be absolutely illegal.
Thanks & regards,
S K Bandyopadhyay (WB, Howrah) CEO - USD HR Solutions +91 98310 81531 skb@usdhrs.in USD HR Solutions – To Strive towards excellence with effort and integrity
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear All,
Thank you all for your valuable response. As the unfair practice (adjusting the gratuity difference from the salary of employees) is being adopted by many companies, the question now is how it can be corrected through the government or administration as a single employee cannot go against the company.
Thanks and Regards, Tushar
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you all for your valuable response. As the unfair practice (adjusting the gratuity difference from the salary of employees) is being adopted by many companies, the question now is how it can be corrected through the government or administration as a single employee cannot go against the company.
Thanks and Regards, Tushar
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Tushar,
Will you please mention one case where an employer is adjusting gratuity from an employee's salary with detailed calculation? For your ready reference, I am citing one example for you:
ITEM EXISTING AFTER WAGE CODE IMPLEMENTATION
BASIC 20,000 35,433 HRA 10,000 10,000 SPL.ALLOW 20,000 4,567 MNLY GROSS 50,000 50,000 YRLY GROSS 6,00,000 6,00,000 YRLY PF EMPR(ON 15,000/-) 21,600 21,600 LTA 1,00,000 1,00,000 BONUS (20% OF 12,000/-) 28,800 NIL RETENTION BONUS 1,00,000 1,00,000 YRLY CASH COMPONENT 8,50,400 8,21,600 GRATUITY 11,538 20,442 CTC 8,61,938 8,42,042
The new basic is arrived at by making 50% of the cash component. Here, CTC has come down due to the absence of a Bonus in the proposed calculation, due to the basic increase of more than 21,000/-.
In my opinion, there will be several such conditions that will vary from organizations to organizations after the implementation of the wage code. There is nothing wrong in the new remuneration fixation.
Thanks & Regards,
S K Bandyopadhyay (WB, Howrah) CEO-USD HR Solutions +91 98310 81531
USD HR Solutions – To Strive towards excellence with effort and integrity
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Will you please mention one case where an employer is adjusting gratuity from an employee's salary with detailed calculation? For your ready reference, I am citing one example for you:
ITEM EXISTING AFTER WAGE CODE IMPLEMENTATION
BASIC 20,000 35,433 HRA 10,000 10,000 SPL.ALLOW 20,000 4,567 MNLY GROSS 50,000 50,000 YRLY GROSS 6,00,000 6,00,000 YRLY PF EMPR(ON 15,000/-) 21,600 21,600 LTA 1,00,000 1,00,000 BONUS (20% OF 12,000/-) 28,800 NIL RETENTION BONUS 1,00,000 1,00,000 YRLY CASH COMPONENT 8,50,400 8,21,600 GRATUITY 11,538 20,442 CTC 8,61,938 8,42,042
The new basic is arrived at by making 50% of the cash component. Here, CTC has come down due to the absence of a Bonus in the proposed calculation, due to the basic increase of more than 21,000/-.
In my opinion, there will be several such conditions that will vary from organizations to organizations after the implementation of the wage code. There is nothing wrong in the new remuneration fixation.
Thanks & Regards,
S K Bandyopadhyay (WB, Howrah) CEO-USD HR Solutions +91 98310 81531
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In the above example, first data is existing and 2nd data is after implementation of wage code. S K Bandyopadhyay(WB, Howrah)
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The action of adjusting the difference in Gratuity by deducting leave encashment, etc. is illegal. I have not heard of any other company doing it.
You can, if you wish, go to the Labour Commissioner and file a complaint. If you do not wish to do that, you can ask your union to do it.
Alternatively, you can go and meet officials of the major unions like INTUC, BMS and ask them to take it up. They can force the Labour Commissioner to investigate, and at the moment they have vested interest as they do now like the new labor code.
But how you will keep your name secret is a different story.
I suggest you look for another job because this is not a company you should be working with anyway.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
You can, if you wish, go to the Labour Commissioner and file a complaint. If you do not wish to do that, you can ask your union to do it.
Alternatively, you can go and meet officials of the major unions like INTUC, BMS and ask them to take it up. They can force the Labour Commissioner to investigate, and at the moment they have vested interest as they do now like the new labor code.
But how you will keep your name secret is a different story.
I suggest you look for another job because this is not a company you should be working with anyway.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Register and Log In.
FORM-F-NOMINATI ON OF GRATUITY.pdf
Gratuity Form I.doc