Salary of an employee is withheld, and the company says all salary dues will be settled during F&FS. This is acceptable for a 1-month notice period. If the notice period is for 3 months and the salary is withheld, how can an employee survive without pay? Is it legal to hold the salary for 3 months? In this case, can an employee refuse to serve a 3-month notice period?
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
PTKSVEL: I think it's completely legal and will defer to other members of this forum to provide better insights on this. As a practice, it is completely deplorable though, and I'll urge an open contributory thread from most other members on how to structure an exit clause for employees.
From India, Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
No, this is not legally tenable.
The Payment of Wages Act specifies that the payment of salary or wages must be for a wage period. The wage period cannot exceed a month. Furthermore, wages for the wage period should be paid by the 7th of the next month (10th for large units with more than 1000 workmen). Therefore, holding wages beyond the month is illegal.
Additionally, wages for the remaining period must be disbursed within 2 days from the last working day, and the remaining payment must be made within 1 month from the last working day.
Where the wages are above ₹18,000, the employee is not covered under the Payment of Wages Act, and the above rules do not apply as such. However, in general, this rule applies on grounds of equity. In case of a complaint, the courts could very well impose such a rule as valid.
From India, Mumbai
The Payment of Wages Act specifies that the payment of salary or wages must be for a wage period. The wage period cannot exceed a month. Furthermore, wages for the wage period should be paid by the 7th of the next month (10th for large units with more than 1000 workmen). Therefore, holding wages beyond the month is illegal.
Additionally, wages for the remaining period must be disbursed within 2 days from the last working day, and the remaining payment must be made within 1 month from the last working day.
Where the wages are above ₹18,000, the employee is not covered under the Payment of Wages Act, and the above rules do not apply as such. However, in general, this rule applies on grounds of equity. In case of a complaint, the courts could very well impose such a rule as valid.
From India, Mumbai
The payday is mentioned in the appointment letter, standing orders, (name of the state) Shops and Commercial Establishments Act too.
There are various forms/registers that an employer has to maintain and submit on the payment of wages under enactments applicable to the establishment, e.g., (name of the state) Shops and Commercial Establishments rules. This will prove default of the company.
You can approach the Inspector appointed under the (name of the state) Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, office of the Labor Commissioner, Employees' or Trade Unions, Grievance Redressal Committee, Works Committee.
Submit a written representation addressed to the Head-HR, appointing authority, MD, and let them reply with whatever they want.
From India, Chandigarh
There are various forms/registers that an employer has to maintain and submit on the payment of wages under enactments applicable to the establishment, e.g., (name of the state) Shops and Commercial Establishments rules. This will prove default of the company.
You can approach the Inspector appointed under the (name of the state) Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, office of the Labor Commissioner, Employees' or Trade Unions, Grievance Redressal Committee, Works Committee.
Submit a written representation addressed to the Head-HR, appointing authority, MD, and let them reply with whatever they want.
From India, Chandigarh
Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.