Dear friends,
The above mentioned article has been published in today's Economic Times. Though the article is not published in today's print edition of the Bangalore city, it could be published in day or two. The link of the article is as below:
IBM and Infosys reject bell curve,more companies to follow suit - The Economic Times
Main points of the Article: - If you read the article, you will find that the appraisal system is changed because of the following reasons:
a) Changes in job market scenario. Millennials. i.e. those who have joined workforce after 2000, quit job frequently. Bell Curve is not suitable for the current job market scenario.
b) The article says: "This group of people we manage today want fast, frequent, instant and more feedback," said Richard Lobo, senior vice-president at Infosys, where millennials form nearly 85% of the workforce. "These youngsters are driven and are comfortable being measured against something they understand unlike the earlier generations," he said.
My Comments on the Article or Bell Curve: - The news article does not mention the inherent flaws of the Bell Curve Appraisal method. In this method, people are rated as Excellent, Very good, Good, Average etc and for each rating the percentage is fixed. Now suppose, for "Excellent" category if the maximum percentage allotted is 10, and if the organisation has more than 10% "Excellent" performers, then some of the employees were required to downgraded to "Very Good" slab. Is this not injustice to them? Converse of this is also true. Suppose the organisation does not have 10% "Excellent" performers. Therefore, to fulfil the quota, Managers might upgrade few employees from "Very Good" rating to "Excellent".
Final comments: - When I provide consulting services to establish Performance Management System (PMS), I have eliminated the innate flaw of the Bell Curve Appraisal Method. Though I maintain the same grading structure while designing the PMS, the focus is more on accuracy of the measurement of the performance and understand actually how many employees are falling in each performance slab. Truthfulness of data emerged from the analysis of the performance cycle helps organisation to design their recruitment or training policies.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
7879The above mentioned article has been published in today's Economic Times. Though the article is not published in today's print edition of the Bangalore city, it could be published in day or two. The link of the article is as below:
IBM and Infosys reject bell curve,more companies to follow suit - The Economic Times
Main points of the Article: - If you read the article, you will find that the appraisal system is changed because of the following reasons:
a) Changes in job market scenario. Millennials. i.e. those who have joined workforce after 2000, quit job frequently. Bell Curve is not suitable for the current job market scenario.
b) The article says: "This group of people we manage today want fast, frequent, instant and more feedback," said Richard Lobo, senior vice-president at Infosys, where millennials form nearly 85% of the workforce. "These youngsters are driven and are comfortable being measured against something they understand unlike the earlier generations," he said.
My Comments on the Article or Bell Curve: - The news article does not mention the inherent flaws of the Bell Curve Appraisal method. In this method, people are rated as Excellent, Very good, Good, Average etc and for each rating the percentage is fixed. Now suppose, for "Excellent" category if the maximum percentage allotted is 10, and if the organisation has more than 10% "Excellent" performers, then some of the employees were required to downgraded to "Very Good" slab. Is this not injustice to them? Converse of this is also true. Suppose the organisation does not have 10% "Excellent" performers. Therefore, to fulfil the quota, Managers might upgrade few employees from "Very Good" rating to "Excellent".
Final comments: - When I provide consulting services to establish Performance Management System (PMS), I have eliminated the innate flaw of the Bell Curve Appraisal Method. Though I maintain the same grading structure while designing the PMS, the focus is more on accuracy of the measurement of the performance and understand actually how many employees are falling in each performance slab. Truthfulness of data emerged from the analysis of the performance cycle helps organisation to design their recruitment or training policies.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Dear friends,
Close on the heels of the above article, today one more news article is published in the Economic Times. The link is as below:
After Infosys,now PricewaterhouseCoopers also shun bell curve for appraisal - The Economic Times
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Close on the heels of the above article, today one more news article is published in the Economic Times. The link is as below:
After Infosys,now PricewaterhouseCoopers also shun bell curve for appraisal - The Economic Times
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
hi dinesh , i would like to thank you for you valuable elaboration in performance management system . would like to introduce the platform at which i got all of my management requirement from the online employment management through HR needs till the operational work .
this software provide all what the concept of hiring , performance , operational with concentrating on bad hires and workplaces conflicts giving easy and flexible solutions try it out corp.etsCouncil.com
From India, Chennai
this software provide all what the concept of hiring , performance , operational with concentrating on bad hires and workplaces conflicts giving easy and flexible solutions try it out corp.etsCouncil.com
From India, Chennai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Create bell curve in XL.doc
Model Questions by Infosys.zip
Bell Curve.xls