Raj,
I was thinking from a different point of view
When it goes to a hr dept of a company, what will they think ?
If it came to me, I would look at it and say : hmmm this guy left without notice and without handover and not relieved. I would automatically reject it unless its far better than other options. Or if ther is an over riding reason to consider him for the job
Whether u call it absconding or give it a finer name, I am sure hr looks abd knows what's happened
In this particular case he may be able to explain. But most of the time the person does not get a chance to explain as hr does screening bases on docs it gets. It rarely asks for any explanation at that stage

From India, Mumbai
Well Saswat, that's what I actually mean !!

At least we HR should become sensitive and progressive to understand such issues.. of individual differences, individual choices etc.

Apart from the case given here, there are people, who on account of certain ideological or emotional issues, or personal tragedies or growth and development purpose, can leave the organization.

When an employer has the right to HIRE n FIRE an employee at his PLEASURE; don't you think equality and natural justice demand that an employee should have an equal right; without going in through the rigmarole of all the HR processes and internal self-made procedures.

Also, in a developed world there are privacy issues involved. I hope you are aware that before embarking on a Background Check, good companies see written permission from the prospective employee that he has no objection.

If his ex-employer are certifying then "Stopped Attending Services" should be accepted as a good enough and fair reason and should be accepted as such; no further questions asked. It is time we, the people in HR should evolve and treat people with respect and not as potential ex-convicts.



Warm regards.

From India, Delhi
On any day it is a better remark than 'dimissal' or 'termination' and the relieving letter denotes that the comapny has accepted the employee's option/choice to leave the company.
B.Saikumar
Mumbai

From India, Mumbai
Exactly dear Saikumar !!!
And I could not agree with you more. (Cite Contribution), who has got considerable experience in IT companies, also finds it acceptable. I hope in future the term "Stopped attending services" gains currency (esp. where the term "äbsconding" or "dismissal" is used).
HR should not cloud an ex-employees' future; rather always provide at least a glimmer of hope.
Warm regards..

From India, Delhi
Dear Rajkumar
I am on the same page with you when you said the word 'stopped attending services' gains currency among employers as a substitute for 'absconding' or 'dismissal' at least in cases which are genuine as it would offer a win-win situation both to the employee and the employer and at least the HR professionals who are memebers of Citehr will adopt this practice.
B.Saikumar
HR & labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
1)

From India, Mumbai
In my point of view, Be positive and Be confident because, If you lost everything.., you can start life from 'O' based stage. Think twice before do everything. Thank you. lvnarasimha
From India, Hyderabad
Anonymous
4

Hi All,
Thanks every one for the timely support.
The current employer has confirmed my employment owing to the change in status ("Stopped attending service") by XXX but with a caveat that any future misconduct would be taken seriously without any mercy.
They have warned me not to share any information, so that, no one quotes my case for any future reference. Please don’t share any personal information (like name of the company, my name) with others.
Thanks.

From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.