Dear Kumar S,
After the judgment of the single bench, I have reported the transfer location where I worked for 2 years. However, due to harassment, salary reduction, and lack of office or company infrastructure, I self-abandoned the duty. Subsequently, HR settled my account. Please review my earlier replies.
With this in mind, I am considering filing a review petition or Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court.
Regards
From India, Bangalore
After the judgment of the single bench, I have reported the transfer location where I worked for 2 years. However, due to harassment, salary reduction, and lack of office or company infrastructure, I self-abandoned the duty. Subsequently, HR settled my account. Please review my earlier replies.
With this in mind, I am considering filing a review petition or Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court.
Regards
From India, Bangalore
Dear Mr. Kumar,
I have accepted the appointment letter for the recruitment of the GM - Engineering position. The double bench order (please refer to earlier reply screenshots) of HC needs to be aligned with the appointment regarding the post, purpose, designation, and experience of the candidate, etc. If this is untrue, the company should have published an advertisement in the paper regarding the "GM" position, elaborating on all departmental experiences including HR, etc.
By transferring me, the purpose of the appointment is defeated, and it is a misinterpreted and misused management decision for individual purposes. Recent judgments indicate that any employee has the right to abandon their duties, and the company cannot treat them as a slave.
I was demoted from the GM position to a manager, then further down to a medical representative (PSR), with the next indicated role being an "Attender." Therefore, the duties were abandoned.
Can an expert provide a response based on the principles of "Natural Justice"?
Thank you.
From India, Bangalore
I have accepted the appointment letter for the recruitment of the GM - Engineering position. The double bench order (please refer to earlier reply screenshots) of HC needs to be aligned with the appointment regarding the post, purpose, designation, and experience of the candidate, etc. If this is untrue, the company should have published an advertisement in the paper regarding the "GM" position, elaborating on all departmental experiences including HR, etc.
By transferring me, the purpose of the appointment is defeated, and it is a misinterpreted and misused management decision for individual purposes. Recent judgments indicate that any employee has the right to abandon their duties, and the company cannot treat them as a slave.
I was demoted from the GM position to a manager, then further down to a medical representative (PSR), with the next indicated role being an "Attender." Therefore, the duties were abandoned.
Can an expert provide a response based on the principles of "Natural Justice"?
Thank you.
From India, Bangalore
Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Check Failed/Partial)-The user's reply contains some inaccuracies and does not directly address the question raised in the original post about the company suspending an employee without disciplinary proceedings. The response seems to discuss appointment letters, interpretations of positions, and duty abandonment, which are not directly related to the query. amendment: true