Dear colleagues,
We are discussing this matter in light of potentially posting a member of the community who seeks advice on whether working with another establishment during the leave period is legal or illegal. We seem to be approaching the issue from a different angle. The Industrial Disputes Act also prohibits gainful employment during a termination challenge petition's pendency. We are now exploring the question of whether double employment is legal or illegal. Interestingly, there has never been any inquiry into the employment status of daily wage/piece-rated earners or individuals engaged in household services or similar work that could be considered double employment. The working nature of these roles is inherently dual, but the situation changes when, for example, a household servant is hired on a monthly salary while performing the same tasks.
The establishment in question is engaged in drawing, design, engineering, and product development work. Should the staff involved in these roles be permitted to engage in double employment for additional monetary gain? The term "moral turpitude" is commonly used in legal contexts, not to target anyone specifically. The concept of a "house of profit" for disqualification and the nature of gainful employment are related in a similar vein. We often struggle with the notion that what we don't have is more desirable than what we do have.
Please review and advise accordingly. Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
647We are discussing this matter in light of potentially posting a member of the community who seeks advice on whether working with another establishment during the leave period is legal or illegal. We seem to be approaching the issue from a different angle. The Industrial Disputes Act also prohibits gainful employment during a termination challenge petition's pendency. We are now exploring the question of whether double employment is legal or illegal. Interestingly, there has never been any inquiry into the employment status of daily wage/piece-rated earners or individuals engaged in household services or similar work that could be considered double employment. The working nature of these roles is inherently dual, but the situation changes when, for example, a household servant is hired on a monthly salary while performing the same tasks.
The establishment in question is engaged in drawing, design, engineering, and product development work. Should the staff involved in these roles be permitted to engage in double employment for additional monetary gain? The term "moral turpitude" is commonly used in legal contexts, not to target anyone specifically. The concept of a "house of profit" for disqualification and the nature of gainful employment are related in a similar vein. We often struggle with the notion that what we don't have is more desirable than what we do have.
Please review and advise accordingly. Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
This is not a fair query.
Try not to spoil this honorary platform laid for good workers' grievances relief advisory status. You have presented annoying employment features usually done by cheap and litigant immoral pretentious employees.
If any really financially suffering employee who prefers to work daily after completion of primary duties of employment can do another job. A car driver who works for his manager from 10 a.m to 5 p.m and also at necessary times, going to work as a computer mechanic in another management firm. This type of dual employment is accepted by all.
But your hypothetical diagnosis-based testing situation does not require any suggestion; it spoils the sanctity of dual employment. Risk-taking depends upon the mentality of a worker and his ambition. A rolling stone gathers nothing in any way.
From India, Nellore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Try not to spoil this honorary platform laid for good workers' grievances relief advisory status. You have presented annoying employment features usually done by cheap and litigant immoral pretentious employees.
If any really financially suffering employee who prefers to work daily after completion of primary duties of employment can do another job. A car driver who works for his manager from 10 a.m to 5 p.m and also at necessary times, going to work as a computer mechanic in another management firm. This type of dual employment is accepted by all.
But your hypothetical diagnosis-based testing situation does not require any suggestion; it spoils the sanctity of dual employment. Risk-taking depends upon the mentality of a worker and his ambition. A rolling stone gathers nothing in any way.
From India, Nellore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.