I do not think members can keep replying to a hypothetical case. Members have other jobs to do and write in the forum out of a helpful nature.
Anyway, details given by you are insufficient to answer the query. Granting back wages or recovering back wages is done on specific grounds. Unless the full circumstances of the plaintiff and defendant are known, the answer will also be as "hypothetical" as your query.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
3251Anyway, details given by you are insufficient to answer the query. Granting back wages or recovering back wages is done on specific grounds. Unless the full circumstances of the plaintiff and defendant are known, the answer will also be as "hypothetical" as your query.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Judgement of the High Court needs to be examined dispassionately.
From India, Kochi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Kochi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
There is a Supreme Court judgment on the status of the last drawn wages received by the workmen during the pendency of the proceeding before the higher courts. Wages received for this period are not to be refunded by the workman if the higher court judgment goes against him. For details, please refer to the Dena Bank Case in Lab I.C.-2001-page-2069, Paragraphs 12 and 13.
Samir Bhattacharya - Consultant,
Email: smbt.samir@gmail.com
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Samir Bhattacharya - Consultant,
Email: smbt.samir@gmail.com
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello Mr., are you playing with us? Earlier, you told us about the years 2002 to 2002, and now you are saying 2007 to 2012. Please clarify when this actually happened and what your problem is. Which high court issued the order?
Don't try to fool us; you will face consequences.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Don't try to fool us; you will face consequences.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I failed to understand as to why moderator is not blocking the ID of this fraud consultant without authenticating the post. So pls I request to moderator not to send this post to my ID. Unsubscribe.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I have already stated the SC decision on Section 17B of the I.D. Act (Payment of full wages to workmen pending proceedings in the higher court).
The Labour Court decision needs to be highlighted clearly as to why the employer was to reinstate the employee with the back wages as per its order. While the employer could have gone to the higher court against the order of the Labour Court and paid him wages under the aforementioned section of the I.D. Act.
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Labour Court decision needs to be highlighted clearly as to why the employer was to reinstate the employee with the back wages as per its order. While the employer could have gone to the higher court against the order of the Labour Court and paid him wages under the aforementioned section of the I.D. Act.
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
EPF - Punjab-Haryana High Court Judgment On Min Wages.pdf
Basic wages & allw.-Madras High Court ruling on the applicability of Provident Fund.docx