If a person remains absent from duty without authorization and the process as per the rule was followed, but still, he didn't return or respond to any of the letters. Now, as per the rule, he should be terminated. The question is, from which date will his termination be effective - from his date of absenteeism or from the date of approval by the competent authority? Furthermore, the problem arises if he is issued a termination letter with the date of approval, whether the absent period will need any treatment.
From Pakistan, Rawalpindi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

If a person remained absent from duty without authorization and the process as per the rule was followed, but still, he didn't return or respond to any of the letters. Now, as per the rule, he should be terminated. The question is, from which date will his termination be effective – i.e., from his date of absenteeism or from the date of approval by competent authority. Furthermore, the problem is if he is issued a termination letter with the date of approval, whether the absent period will need any treatment.
From Pakistan, Rawalpindi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

KK!HR
1656

The termination of service has to be prospective; it cannot have a retrospective effect because the clock cannot be put back. The employee was on the rolls for all purposes until the date of issue of orders, so it cannot be wished away.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.