yeah and many times the HR just glances CV for some keyword but does not research further and just calls for interview and during interview then teh person takes a deep glance he realize that candidate not suitable hence ,, tells ur not suitable, wasting time of candidatesssss.
From India, Madras
113From India, Madras
Suppose that a 35+ or 40+ is the only bread-earner in his family and has no other source of income, but then he or she has required skills,mingle with people, helping in nature and a learner too.
Then should he must accept job rejection only for some unpractical reasons given by HR or Interviewer.
Next comes, regular job hunt till then he or she finds a company which could recruit 35+ or 40+. If an interviewer/recruiter can decide as "Many HR people spend very less time in looking at CVs. I can say the initial 10 seconds or so will make make it for you, or the CV gets trashed.", then such interviewer/recruiter may also offer lesser wages/salary.
Realizing(?!) the difficulty of job market the 35+ or 40+ might be as say, compelled to accept job for low remuneration,taking burden on himself or herself of the present price-rocketing of eatables/commodities/accomodation.
And then if a 35+ or 40+ got recruited by accepting all conditional (compelling) clauses of interviewer/recruiter, he or she will have fear of job security. This because, if a person is allowed inside half-heartedly by interviewers/recruiters, what security is there that they would not harass 35+ or 40+ on the given job, making themselves a room for sooner attrition of 35+s or 40+s. This I have seen happening to colleague while working for a topmost company.
I have included 35+ because there are, in fact people who consider even 35+ as oldage.
When government announced retirement age is 58years, then why 35+ or 40+ not allowed to get recruited, when they already have worked and have experience?
From India, Bangalore
Then should he must accept job rejection only for some unpractical reasons given by HR or Interviewer.
Next comes, regular job hunt till then he or she finds a company which could recruit 35+ or 40+. If an interviewer/recruiter can decide as "Many HR people spend very less time in looking at CVs. I can say the initial 10 seconds or so will make make it for you, or the CV gets trashed.", then such interviewer/recruiter may also offer lesser wages/salary.
Realizing(?!) the difficulty of job market the 35+ or 40+ might be as say, compelled to accept job for low remuneration,taking burden on himself or herself of the present price-rocketing of eatables/commodities/accomodation.
And then if a 35+ or 40+ got recruited by accepting all conditional (compelling) clauses of interviewer/recruiter, he or she will have fear of job security. This because, if a person is allowed inside half-heartedly by interviewers/recruiters, what security is there that they would not harass 35+ or 40+ on the given job, making themselves a room for sooner attrition of 35+s or 40+s. This I have seen happening to colleague while working for a topmost company.
I have included 35+ because there are, in fact people who consider even 35+ as oldage.
When government announced retirement age is 58years, then why 35+ or 40+ not allowed to get recruited, when they already have worked and have experience?
From India, Bangalore
Additionally, job hunt includes expenditure; buying dailies/weeklys/monthlys,internet browsing,paper work,travelling to and fro interview places, food and health
From India, Bangalore
From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Age.xls
Sample Competency Based Interview Questions.doc