I am employing some staff and 2 of them were given work from home option. Among these two, one staff while working fell sick, did not recover and died after some time.
Do I have to pay him/her any compensation? Can anybody elaborate and advise me?
Do I have to pay him/her any compensation? Can anybody elaborate and advise me?
Working from Home is a new arrangement. Therefore, we are unable to give an advise in the backdrop of any verdict from the Court. But as the place from where the employee is working is expected to be a workplace, an accident caused in connection with the work shall come under the scope of accident while and during the course of employment. In case, the employee was under pressure of work, that you had tortured him mentally, and that torture could be the reason for his collapse, then also it will come under the scope of accident attracting compensation. Obviously, if he was covered by ESI, compensation payable would be paid by the ESI Corporation. On the other hand, if he was not an ESI covered employee, then the compensation as per Employees Compensation Act should be borned by the employer.
BUT all employees will not come under the purview of Employees Compensation Act. Since yours is not a factory or plantation (a factory or plantation cannot work from home) it is presumed that your establishment is a shop or commercial establishment. In respect of such establishments, the employees who are employed in an activity listed in schedule II of the Act. Clerical persons, IT Engineers etc are not employees for this purpose. Please refer to the schedule II of the Act.
From India, Kannur
BUT all employees will not come under the purview of Employees Compensation Act. Since yours is not a factory or plantation (a factory or plantation cannot work from home) it is presumed that your establishment is a shop or commercial establishment. In respect of such establishments, the employees who are employed in an activity listed in schedule II of the Act. Clerical persons, IT Engineers etc are not employees for this purpose. Please refer to the schedule II of the Act.
From India, Kannur
The employer had decided the work from home as 'work place' for his employed staff and have been receiving the services.
Resulting of death while on work amounts for compensation, if the claim made by the keen of the employees before the appropriate authority under EC.
Because, The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, provides for payment of compensation to the employees and their dependants in the case of injury by industrial accidents including certain occupational diseases arising out of and in the course of employment resulting in death or disablement(the sickness due to work load or pertaining to work pressure from the employer) .
You need to wait till the claim complaint from the appropriate authority.
From India, Mumbai
Resulting of death while on work amounts for compensation, if the claim made by the keen of the employees before the appropriate authority under EC.
Because, The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, provides for payment of compensation to the employees and their dependants in the case of injury by industrial accidents including certain occupational diseases arising out of and in the course of employment resulting in death or disablement(the sickness due to work load or pertaining to work pressure from the employer) .
You need to wait till the claim complaint from the appropriate authority.
From India, Mumbai
Hi Balanagendra Kumar
I'm sorry to hear about the loss of your employee. The laws surrounding compensation for remote workers who fall ill and subsequently pass away can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the terms of their employment contract. Here are some general points to consider:
Workers' Compensation Laws:
In many jurisdictions, employees who sustain injuries or illnesses related to their work are covered by workers' compensation laws. Whether an illness contracted while working from home qualifies for workers' compensation will depend on the specific circumstances and the laws in your area.
Employment Contract:
Review the employment contract of the deceased employee. It may outline provisions regarding compensation in the event of illness or death. If there's any ambiguity, seek legal advice to interpret the contract.
Company Policies:
Some companies have policies in place for situations like this. Check your company's policies and procedures manual or consult with HR to understand any applicable policies regarding compensation for remote workers in such circumstances.
Compassionate Consideration:
Even if there are no legal obligations, you might consider providing some form of compensation or support to the family of the deceased employee out of compassion. This could include payment of any accrued benefits or a one-time payment to assist the family during this difficult time.
Legal Advice: If you're unsure about your obligations or the best course of action, it's advisable to seek legal advice. A lawyer specializing in employment law can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation and help ensure that you handle the matter in a legally compliant and compassionate manner
.
Ultimately, the specifics of the situation, including the laws in your jurisdiction and the terms of the employment contract, will determine whether compensation is required. It's essential to approach the situation with empathy and sensitivity while also ensuring that you fulfill any legal obligations.
Thanks
From India, Bangalore
I'm sorry to hear about the loss of your employee. The laws surrounding compensation for remote workers who fall ill and subsequently pass away can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the terms of their employment contract. Here are some general points to consider:
Workers' Compensation Laws:
In many jurisdictions, employees who sustain injuries or illnesses related to their work are covered by workers' compensation laws. Whether an illness contracted while working from home qualifies for workers' compensation will depend on the specific circumstances and the laws in your area.
Employment Contract:
Review the employment contract of the deceased employee. It may outline provisions regarding compensation in the event of illness or death. If there's any ambiguity, seek legal advice to interpret the contract.
Company Policies:
Some companies have policies in place for situations like this. Check your company's policies and procedures manual or consult with HR to understand any applicable policies regarding compensation for remote workers in such circumstances.
Compassionate Consideration:
Even if there are no legal obligations, you might consider providing some form of compensation or support to the family of the deceased employee out of compassion. This could include payment of any accrued benefits or a one-time payment to assist the family during this difficult time.
Legal Advice: If you're unsure about your obligations or the best course of action, it's advisable to seek legal advice. A lawyer specializing in employment law can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation and help ensure that you handle the matter in a legally compliant and compassionate manner
.
Ultimately, the specifics of the situation, including the laws in your jurisdiction and the terms of the employment contract, will determine whether compensation is required. It's essential to approach the situation with empathy and sensitivity while also ensuring that you fulfill any legal obligations.
Thanks
From India, Bangalore
As we are aware, matters concerning 'WFH' thrown open consequent to circumstances followed 'covid-19' impacts. I afraid relevant provisions of various acts, rules have not been amended suitable for this conditions. And elaborate case laws are necessary to clarify this issue.
Please read the contents in this link - https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/liability-to-pay-compensation-on-death-of-worker-arises-immediately-after-demise-sc/articleshow/90157257.cms?from=mdr
Liability to pay compensation on death of worker arises immediately after demise: SC
Synopsis:
In the verdict, the apex court dealt with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 while coming to the rescue of a family whose bread-earner had died of a snake bite in 2009 while cutting sugarcane at a field in Solapur district of Maharashtra.
Writing the judgement, Justice Shah dealt with provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act and said the compensation has to be paid as soon as it falls due.
The liability to pay compensation on the part of the employer would arise immediately on the death of a workman and the interest would also be levied from the date of demise and not from the date of the order passed by the Commissioner, the Supreme Court said on Friday.
In the verdict, the apex court dealt with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 while coming to the rescue of a family whose bread-earner had died of a snake bite in 2009 while cutting sugarcane at a field in Solapur district of Maharashtra.
A bench of justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna termed as “unsustainable” the Bombay High Court's order.
The Aurangabad bench of the high court had upheld the award of Rs 3.06 lakh to the family of the workers.
However, the high court modified the aspect of the Commissioner's order with regard to interest and said simple interest at the rate of 12 per cent would be charged after one month from the date of compensation order and not from the date of death.
Writing the judgement, Justice Shah dealt with provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act and said the compensation has to be paid as soon as it falls due.
“Therefore, on the death of the employee/deceased immediately, the amount of compensation can be said to be falling due. Therefore, the liability to pay the compensation would arise immediately on the death of the deceased,” it said.
“The liability to pay the compensation would arise from the date on which the deceased died for which he is entitled to the compensation and therefore, the liability to pay the interest on the amount of arrears/compensation shall be from the date of accident and not from the date of the order passed by the Commissioner,” it said.
As per the case records, a workman had died of snakebite in the sugarcane field on November 29, 2009, and as neither the sugar factory nor the contractor paid the compensation, the family members moved a claim petition before the Commissioner Workmen's Compensation at Beed and claimed Rs 5 lakh.
By order in 2017, the Commissioner allowed the plea and asked the Chairman, Vithalrao Shinde Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, and others to pay the compensation of Rs 3.06 lakh along with simple interest at the rate of 12 per cent from the date of the accident.
From India, Bangalore
Please read the contents in this link - https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/liability-to-pay-compensation-on-death-of-worker-arises-immediately-after-demise-sc/articleshow/90157257.cms?from=mdr
Liability to pay compensation on death of worker arises immediately after demise: SC
Synopsis:
In the verdict, the apex court dealt with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 while coming to the rescue of a family whose bread-earner had died of a snake bite in 2009 while cutting sugarcane at a field in Solapur district of Maharashtra.
Writing the judgement, Justice Shah dealt with provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act and said the compensation has to be paid as soon as it falls due.
The liability to pay compensation on the part of the employer would arise immediately on the death of a workman and the interest would also be levied from the date of demise and not from the date of the order passed by the Commissioner, the Supreme Court said on Friday.
In the verdict, the apex court dealt with the provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 while coming to the rescue of a family whose bread-earner had died of a snake bite in 2009 while cutting sugarcane at a field in Solapur district of Maharashtra.
A bench of justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna termed as “unsustainable” the Bombay High Court's order.
The Aurangabad bench of the high court had upheld the award of Rs 3.06 lakh to the family of the workers.
However, the high court modified the aspect of the Commissioner's order with regard to interest and said simple interest at the rate of 12 per cent would be charged after one month from the date of compensation order and not from the date of death.
Writing the judgement, Justice Shah dealt with provisions of the Employee's Compensation Act and said the compensation has to be paid as soon as it falls due.
“Therefore, on the death of the employee/deceased immediately, the amount of compensation can be said to be falling due. Therefore, the liability to pay the compensation would arise immediately on the death of the deceased,” it said.
“The liability to pay the compensation would arise from the date on which the deceased died for which he is entitled to the compensation and therefore, the liability to pay the interest on the amount of arrears/compensation shall be from the date of accident and not from the date of the order passed by the Commissioner,” it said.
As per the case records, a workman had died of snakebite in the sugarcane field on November 29, 2009, and as neither the sugar factory nor the contractor paid the compensation, the family members moved a claim petition before the Commissioner Workmen's Compensation at Beed and claimed Rs 5 lakh.
By order in 2017, the Commissioner allowed the plea and asked the Chairman, Vithalrao Shinde Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, and others to pay the compensation of Rs 3.06 lakh along with simple interest at the rate of 12 per cent from the date of the accident.
From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.