I am trying to understand the compensation structure and benefits that are offered to employees in an NGO, whether a Society or Trust or Sec 8 company. Organisations that I have spoken to say they do not provide the same and believe it is not applicable. However, my interpretation is that these organisations are establishments which have more than 20 employees (at least the one I spoke to) and hence it is applicable. Ideally, they should be registered under the respective Shops and Establishment Act.
One argument against Gratuity is we follow a cash basis of accounting, which means we can't provide for it if the project may not last 5 years, and a new donor doesn't want to support the liability, and the organisation doesn't have surplus funds to pay for it. Would request the experts to shed light on this. Thanks.
From India, Noida
One argument against Gratuity is we follow a cash basis of accounting, which means we can't provide for it if the project may not last 5 years, and a new donor doesn't want to support the liability, and the organisation doesn't have surplus funds to pay for it. Would request the experts to shed light on this. Thanks.
From India, Noida
Dear Shanthi, Your interpretation is correct. Others may be under the wrong impression that since a charitable organization registered under the State Societies Registration Acts or u/s 8 or 25 of the Companies Act, 2013 is a non-profit organization and is exempt from certain provisions of certain laws like the Companies Act, 2013, Income Tax Act, etc., it is also exempted from the labor laws of the country.
If you read the interpretation of the term "industry" in the Supreme Court's historic judgment in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa case which still holds good, what is important is the systematic co-operation between the employer and employees in the running of the organization for the purpose of satisfaction of human needs or wants. Even in case Spirituality is the main purpose, if certain activities of the organization are separable as analogous to industry, the "dominant nature test" has to be applied. Already societies registered under the Societies Registration Act are brought within the purview of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 by means of notification u/s 1(3)(c) of the Act.
The arguments said to be advanced are quite untenable. The financial commitments towards the lawful running of the organization cannot be deleted from the budget to compute the surplusage of the funds of the organization. It is the effectiveness of the efforts of the trustees or directors of the organization to mobilize funds by other means if any donor is circumspect about the ways of the use of money donated by him.
From India, Salem
If you read the interpretation of the term "industry" in the Supreme Court's historic judgment in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa case which still holds good, what is important is the systematic co-operation between the employer and employees in the running of the organization for the purpose of satisfaction of human needs or wants. Even in case Spirituality is the main purpose, if certain activities of the organization are separable as analogous to industry, the "dominant nature test" has to be applied. Already societies registered under the Societies Registration Act are brought within the purview of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 by means of notification u/s 1(3)(c) of the Act.
The arguments said to be advanced are quite untenable. The financial commitments towards the lawful running of the organization cannot be deleted from the budget to compute the surplusage of the funds of the organization. It is the effectiveness of the efforts of the trustees or directors of the organization to mobilize funds by other means if any donor is circumspect about the ways of the use of money donated by him.
From India, Salem
When you deal with the donors and tell them how much you need for a project, you need to include employees' cost on CTC basis. If they ask for CTC breakup, show statutory dues clearly.
The donor probably does not care about statutory dues as it hardly affects or impacts them. However, your organization, directors, trustees, as well as managers, will be liable for prosecution. Is that a risk you want to take? The excuse that a donor refused to give us is definitively not acceptable to the courts.
From India, Mumbai
The donor probably does not care about statutory dues as it hardly affects or impacts them. However, your organization, directors, trustees, as well as managers, will be liable for prosecution. Is that a risk you want to take? The excuse that a donor refused to give us is definitively not acceptable to the courts.
From India, Mumbai
Constitution of the organization does not affect entitlement to gratuity or other benefits like Maternity benefits, etc.
There is an employer-employee relationship in the organization.
Maintaining books on a mercantile basis, cash basis, or accrual basis is a company decision and it cannot affect entitlement to gratuity.
From India, Pune
There is an employer-employee relationship in the organization.
Maintaining books on a mercantile basis, cash basis, or accrual basis is a company decision and it cannot affect entitlement to gratuity.
From India, Pune
Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.