I would like to know about the principal-to-principal basis of a contract. Can you please help me understand where the aspect of "Principal to Principal" is defined and what the benefits are of entering into a contract on a principal-to-principal basis? Are there any case rulings related to this?
If a company is opting for a principal-to-principal basis contract, does it mean that the parent company (principal employer) does not have any statutory liability?
Kindly assist me.
Regards,
RAM
From India
If a company is opting for a principal-to-principal basis contract, does it mean that the parent company (principal employer) does not have any statutory liability?
Kindly assist me.
Regards,
RAM
From India
The provisions of the Contract Labour Act are very clear. The definition of a contract worker is also clearly stated. If the workers come under the definition, then the principal employer is liable for wages, safety, health, welfare, and all statutory dues. Claiming that an agreement is on a principal-to-principal basis or that it's a services contract or that it's lump sum or piece rate, etc., holds no water in court.
Supply of Products/Goods Only
It would be different if the contract was for only the supply of products/goods. Without any other services or work linked (and therefore the workers are not in your factory), would the principal-to-principal system work.
From India, Mumbai
Supply of Products/Goods Only
It would be different if the contract was for only the supply of products/goods. Without any other services or work linked (and therefore the workers are not in your factory), would the principal-to-principal system work.
From India, Mumbai
Understanding Principal-to-Principal Contracts
In the context of the Contract Labour Act, it is important to note that the definition of a contract worker is clearly outlined. If workers fall within this definition, the principal employer holds liability for various aspects such as wages, safety, health, welfare, and statutory dues. Merely labeling an agreement as 'principal-to-principal' or any other classification does not absolve the principal employer of these responsibilities.
Legal Implications and Case Precedents
When it comes to case rulings, courts typically prioritize the actual nature of the working relationship over the terminology used in the contract. If the agreement involves the supply of products or goods only, without services or linked work that would bring workers into the principal's premises, the principal-to-principal arrangement may be viable.
Statutory Liability Consideration
However, if the workers are deemed contract workers under the law and are involved in activities that align with the definition provided by the Contract Labour Act, the principal employer cannot evade statutory liability by framing the contract as principal-to-principal.
Key Takeaway
It is crucial for businesses to ensure compliance with labor laws and accurately classify their workforce to avoid legal repercussions. Seeking legal counsel to review agreements and working arrangements can provide clarity on the implications of different contract structures.
From India, Gurugram
In the context of the Contract Labour Act, it is important to note that the definition of a contract worker is clearly outlined. If workers fall within this definition, the principal employer holds liability for various aspects such as wages, safety, health, welfare, and statutory dues. Merely labeling an agreement as 'principal-to-principal' or any other classification does not absolve the principal employer of these responsibilities.
Legal Implications and Case Precedents
When it comes to case rulings, courts typically prioritize the actual nature of the working relationship over the terminology used in the contract. If the agreement involves the supply of products or goods only, without services or linked work that would bring workers into the principal's premises, the principal-to-principal arrangement may be viable.
Statutory Liability Consideration
However, if the workers are deemed contract workers under the law and are involved in activities that align with the definition provided by the Contract Labour Act, the principal employer cannot evade statutory liability by framing the contract as principal-to-principal.
Key Takeaway
It is crucial for businesses to ensure compliance with labor laws and accurately classify their workforce to avoid legal repercussions. Seeking legal counsel to review agreements and working arrangements can provide clarity on the implications of different contract structures.
From India, Gurugram
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.


2510