Just wanted some opinion - is "Real World Knowledge" more appropriate than "Real World Insights" for CiteHR. What resonates with you more? Regards, Sid
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
679From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Sid,
Good topic to anticipate. Real-world situations differ in the critical thinking essential for being instances and livelihood.
Real World Knowledge:
Encourages any human to seek and interpret, accept, and criticize. Feels like "I" can handle the worldly instincts on the basis of gut feeling. They want to prepare themselves to start action. Ultimately, while trying, they choose the best elucidation.
Real World Insights:
Here the critical thinking synchronizes with the above. Rapid and deliberate situations occur when actually applying.
Consequently, Real World Insight and Real World Knowledge coincide with each other and reciprocate.
From India, Visakhapatnam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Good topic to anticipate. Real-world situations differ in the critical thinking essential for being instances and livelihood.
Real World Knowledge:
Encourages any human to seek and interpret, accept, and criticize. Feels like "I" can handle the worldly instincts on the basis of gut feeling. They want to prepare themselves to start action. Ultimately, while trying, they choose the best elucidation.
Real World Insights:
Here the critical thinking synchronizes with the above. Rapid and deliberate situations occur when actually applying.
Consequently, Real World Insight and Real World Knowledge coincide with each other and reciprocate.
From India, Visakhapatnam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello,
I prefer to distinguish between "knowledge" and "insights" as "knowledge" could stop at the "information" level, and "insights" will go deeper. Insights can lead to the evolution of new "concepts," but mere "knowledge" does not! Knowledge can be superficial, but insights can never be superficial! The present usage of "insights" may stay! Strictly my point of view on the invitation, please.
Regards,
Samvedan
November 27, 2012
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I prefer to distinguish between "knowledge" and "insights" as "knowledge" could stop at the "information" level, and "insights" will go deeper. Insights can lead to the evolution of new "concepts," but mere "knowledge" does not! Knowledge can be superficial, but insights can never be superficial! The present usage of "insights" may stay! Strictly my point of view on the invitation, please.
Regards,
Samvedan
November 27, 2012
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Friends,
In my opinion, Mr. Samvedan is right. The word 'insight' goes beyond knowledge; it is the deep understanding of concepts. It is the application of gained knowledge in practical situations, acting as a filter for what is right or wrong.
So, the word 'insight' please stay.
Thank you.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In my opinion, Mr. Samvedan is right. The word 'insight' goes beyond knowledge; it is the deep understanding of concepts. It is the application of gained knowledge in practical situations, acting as a filter for what is right or wrong.
So, the word 'insight' please stay.
Thank you.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks Sharmila, Samvedan, Ramesh, Vrushali,
We shall let this remain. Other than this, what do you feel we could do to improve the feel of this community? I am particularly interested in the understanding of the difference between Linkedin answers and Cite.co - what, according to you, is the biggest difference here?
Some of the main reasons, in my opinion, are:
- A close-knit community feel - not the usual corporate rat race.
- A pursuit of knowledge and discovery.
- Real-world problems shared by other members - not necessarily from HR.
- Really sensitive discussions are kept separate from the LinkedIn profile, which is like a resume.
What else do you think is the differentiator - Anything else?
Regards,
Sid
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
We shall let this remain. Other than this, what do you feel we could do to improve the feel of this community? I am particularly interested in the understanding of the difference between Linkedin answers and Cite.co - what, according to you, is the biggest difference here?
Some of the main reasons, in my opinion, are:
- A close-knit community feel - not the usual corporate rat race.
- A pursuit of knowledge and discovery.
- Real-world problems shared by other members - not necessarily from HR.
- Really sensitive discussions are kept separate from the LinkedIn profile, which is like a resume.
What else do you think is the differentiator - Anything else?
Regards,
Sid
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello,
A few more reasons could be:
1) The comfort level with citeHR where one feels the personal touch and finds it easy to relate.
2) The LinkedIn site, by offering too many services such as an address book, discussion groups, placement services, and write-ups of leaders, displays a confused and distorted focus to me.
3) There, I also find a greater pushy sales effort, too composite a stance for a learner or a novice to relate to!
My view could be biased as I am more active on this message board than the other one, but this is an opinion shared above!
Regards,
Samvedan
November 28, 2012
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
A few more reasons could be:
1) The comfort level with citeHR where one feels the personal touch and finds it easy to relate.
2) The LinkedIn site, by offering too many services such as an address book, discussion groups, placement services, and write-ups of leaders, displays a confused and distorted focus to me.
3) There, I also find a greater pushy sales effort, too composite a stance for a learner or a novice to relate to!
My view could be biased as I am more active on this message board than the other one, but this is an opinion shared above!
Regards,
Samvedan
November 28, 2012
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi, I think insight comes from wisdom. It is gained through experience, knowledge, and thoughtful meditation. Knowledge alone has nothing to do with wisdom or insight. Insight involves taking all input and using intellect to find connections and draw conclusions. Many people can memorize data and repeat it, but whether they understand the meaning and can extrapolate that meaning to draw valid conclusions is another matter.
Hence, "Real World Insights" are more appropriate. I am not as active on LinkedIn compared to Cite Co., but I will surely delve into the details and share my thoughts very soon.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hence, "Real World Insights" are more appropriate. I am not as active on LinkedIn compared to Cite Co., but I will surely delve into the details and share my thoughts very soon.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Greetings,
This is to substantiate what Samvedan had mentioned. Recently, I represented Cite Communities at a summit for Mobile Applications. One of the important insights that got me thinking was on Angry Birds.
Angry Birds has the largest user base, only because it doesn't need any manual. Usability remains self-explanatory, even though the rules may change with every level, keeping the user engagement unaffected. This was quite insightful because designing any service or product stands defeated if the users don't find it easy to use.
Culture comes next. LinkedIn is very job-focused, hence offering its users newer jobs than learning.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
This is to substantiate what Samvedan had mentioned. Recently, I represented Cite Communities at a summit for Mobile Applications. One of the important insights that got me thinking was on Angry Birds.
Angry Birds has the largest user base, only because it doesn't need any manual. Usability remains self-explanatory, even though the rules may change with every level, keeping the user engagement unaffected. This was quite insightful because designing any service or product stands defeated if the users don't find it easy to use.
Culture comes next. LinkedIn is very job-focused, hence offering its users newer jobs than learning.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sid,
Thank you for raising the query about the appropriate Tag for CiteHR. Though I knew that Knowledge, Wisdon, and Insight were hierarchical, I was not very clear about the relationships. Post by Samvedan and others cleared the confusion and also created an urge to search the web and get a good grasp about it. An anolgy from the field of education is the difference between an MD degree and a PhD degree. A person with MD has the knowledge which (s)he applies, whereas a person with a PhD is supposed to create new knowledge.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...een-md-and-phd
At #2: immerse yourself… « THE MINISTRY of INS!GHTS
I got more information about the 7-steps to insight that our members might find it interesting.
Though I have registered at Linkedin and I find it more useful for networking rather than seeking and giving help. However, I stand to be corrected. It takes a quite of effort to educate CiteHR members to search the site before seeking help for questions that have already been covered at CiteHR in the past.
From United Kingdom
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you for raising the query about the appropriate Tag for CiteHR. Though I knew that Knowledge, Wisdon, and Insight were hierarchical, I was not very clear about the relationships. Post by Samvedan and others cleared the confusion and also created an urge to search the web and get a good grasp about it. An anolgy from the field of education is the difference between an MD degree and a PhD degree. A person with MD has the knowledge which (s)he applies, whereas a person with a PhD is supposed to create new knowledge.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...een-md-and-phd
At #2: immerse yourself… « THE MINISTRY of INS!GHTS
I got more information about the 7-steps to insight that our members might find it interesting.
Though I have registered at Linkedin and I find it more useful for networking rather than seeking and giving help. However, I stand to be corrected. It takes a quite of effort to educate CiteHR members to search the site before seeking help for questions that have already been covered at CiteHR in the past.
From United Kingdom
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear All,
"Real World Insights" is more appropriate than "Real World Knowledge," but both are important for the real world. Knowledge grows when you share; insight is a gathering of open-minded individuals. "Real World Knowledge" is hidden in "Real World Insights" ... I vote for both.
Difference between CiteHR & Linkedin:
I find CiteHR more professional than Linkedin. Linkedin doesn't have control over the members' experience, whether they are freshers, experienced, or in business, making it resemble an advertisement portal. This aspect is beneficial for business people and resourcing, but Linkedin still has its brand in the market.
I always prioritize CiteHR as my first choice as I am an HR professional.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
"Real World Insights" is more appropriate than "Real World Knowledge," but both are important for the real world. Knowledge grows when you share; insight is a gathering of open-minded individuals. "Real World Knowledge" is hidden in "Real World Insights" ... I vote for both.
Difference between CiteHR & Linkedin:
I find CiteHR more professional than Linkedin. Linkedin doesn't have control over the members' experience, whether they are freshers, experienced, or in business, making it resemble an advertisement portal. This aspect is beneficial for business people and resourcing, but Linkedin still has its brand in the market.
I always prioritize CiteHR as my first choice as I am an HR professional.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.