Dear Sirs,
We are in the process of setting KRA in the manufacturing sector. A few months ago, we established the Safety department. We have assigned the KRA for the safety officer as "Achieve and maintain a Zero reportable accident status." Our safety officer is arguing how HR can assign this type of KRA to a single department or person. According to his statement, HR needs to assign KRAs that are 100% in his control and not on others.
I am now confused. Can anybody suggest KRAs for the safety department/safety officer? I am expecting that seniors will show me the way regarding this matter.
Thank you in advance,
Abhay
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
52We are in the process of setting KRA in the manufacturing sector. A few months ago, we established the Safety department. We have assigned the KRA for the safety officer as "Achieve and maintain a Zero reportable accident status." Our safety officer is arguing how HR can assign this type of KRA to a single department or person. According to his statement, HR needs to assign KRAs that are 100% in his control and not on others.
I am now confused. Can anybody suggest KRAs for the safety department/safety officer? I am expecting that seniors will show me the way regarding this matter.
Thank you in advance,
Abhay
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Friends,
There are certain departments in an organization (industry) where KRA (Key Result Area) can be set. Department and individual efficiency can be measured with the results achieved against KRA. However, for certain departments and individuals, KRA is not workable. The set KRA should be achievable with the resources and the existing management systems. Here we have to keep in mind that while setting KRA, it is not to the whim of the one who sets it. KRA will only be set on consensus. Officers who are conversant with the functioning of various departments or individuals alone can set KRA. Fixing KRA for the safety department or safety officer is an example.
We work with men, materials, equipment, and the environment. It is only our dream to achieve and maintain zero accidents. It is only a slogan used by safety personnel to motivate workers/staff. The safety department functions in an advisory capacity. They have no role in the core business. It means the safety department has no control over most other functions.
Again, responsibility for accident prevention is not only with the safety officers. It is a collective job. From the CEO to the last-grade worker, everyone in the industry has a specific role in accident prevention. If you have to set "Achieve & maintain Zero reportable accident status" as KRA, it is applicable for the industry in total and not for the safety department or safety officer alone.
If it is necessary to set KRA for the safety department, it should be for the activities.
For example: We can set KRA on the number of inspections/auditing, safety meetings, safety training, mock drills, etc. and it is as simple as that.
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
There are certain departments in an organization (industry) where KRA (Key Result Area) can be set. Department and individual efficiency can be measured with the results achieved against KRA. However, for certain departments and individuals, KRA is not workable. The set KRA should be achievable with the resources and the existing management systems. Here we have to keep in mind that while setting KRA, it is not to the whim of the one who sets it. KRA will only be set on consensus. Officers who are conversant with the functioning of various departments or individuals alone can set KRA. Fixing KRA for the safety department or safety officer is an example.
We work with men, materials, equipment, and the environment. It is only our dream to achieve and maintain zero accidents. It is only a slogan used by safety personnel to motivate workers/staff. The safety department functions in an advisory capacity. They have no role in the core business. It means the safety department has no control over most other functions.
Again, responsibility for accident prevention is not only with the safety officers. It is a collective job. From the CEO to the last-grade worker, everyone in the industry has a specific role in accident prevention. If you have to set "Achieve & maintain Zero reportable accident status" as KRA, it is applicable for the industry in total and not for the safety department or safety officer alone.
If it is necessary to set KRA for the safety department, it should be for the activities.
For example: We can set KRA on the number of inspections/auditing, safety meetings, safety training, mock drills, etc. and it is as simple as that.
Regards,
Kesava Pillai
From India, Kollam
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Dear all,
Other key parameters for KRA can be:
1. LTIFR
2. Near miss reporting
3. Number of training sessions conducted
4. Reduction in fire incidents
5. Successful completion of critical tasks
6. Number of serious unsafe work incidents stopped in time
7. Innovations implemented
8. Improvement projects, etc.
Regards,
Hansa Vyas
From India, Udaipur
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
0
0
Other key parameters for KRA can be:
1. LTIFR
2. Near miss reporting
3. Number of training sessions conducted
4. Reduction in fire incidents
5. Successful completion of critical tasks
6. Number of serious unsafe work incidents stopped in time
7. Innovations implemented
8. Improvement projects, etc.
Regards,
Hansa Vyas
From India, Udaipur
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The user reply provides accurate and relevant key parameters for setting KRAs for the safety department. No corrections needed. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Dear Mr. Abhay,
I am totally in agreement with Mr. Keshava Pillai's views. Along with that, I wish to highlight some more points:
As you have established the safety department recently, the Safety Officer's KRA has to be more focused on implementing a safety culture in your organization. For example, framing an HSE Policy in consultation with top management. The HSE policy must be specific, measurable, and achievable with risk assessments done for hazardous jobs.
Accordingly, you can frame his KRA to track the progress made in implementing the policy, preparing and implementing Safe Operating Procedures, HSE Manual preparation, etc.
Regards,
Firoz Khan
EHS
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
0
0
I am totally in agreement with Mr. Keshava Pillai's views. Along with that, I wish to highlight some more points:
As you have established the safety department recently, the Safety Officer's KRA has to be more focused on implementing a safety culture in your organization. For example, framing an HSE Policy in consultation with top management. The HSE policy must be specific, measurable, and achievable with risk assessments done for hazardous jobs.
Accordingly, you can frame his KRA to track the progress made in implementing the policy, preparing and implementing Safe Operating Procedures, HSE Manual preparation, etc.
Regards,
Firoz Khan
EHS
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The user's reply is correct in emphasizing the importance of focusing on implementing a safety culture and specific tasks for the safety officer's KRA. However, it's important to note that assigning the KRA of achieving and maintaining zero reportable accidents is acceptable as long as it is within the control and influence of the safety officer. It is common practice to have safety-related KRAs for safety officers. Therefore, the KRA mentioned in the original post is appropriate if the safety officer can influence and contribute to achieving it. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Your safety officer view is 100% correct. In our company, achieving zero reportable accidents is prioritized for front-line supervisors and shop floor managers. The following could be the KRA of safety officers:
1. Ensuring statutory compliance - testing and certification of equipment by a competent person.
2. Conducting safety training programs for all the workforce. XX mandays per employee.
3. Conducting various competitions and promotional activities to instill safety awareness among the workforce.
4. Implementing a permit-to-work system.
5. Guiding shop floor managers in selecting the right PPE.
6. Driving the safety committee, among other responsibilities.
Regards,
Durairaj.CR
Head of Safety
Titan Industries Limited
Hosur-635126
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
0
0
1. Ensuring statutory compliance - testing and certification of equipment by a competent person.
2. Conducting safety training programs for all the workforce. XX mandays per employee.
3. Conducting various competitions and promotional activities to instill safety awareness among the workforce.
4. Implementing a permit-to-work system.
5. Guiding shop floor managers in selecting the right PPE.
6. Driving the safety committee, among other responsibilities.
Regards,
Durairaj.CR
Head of Safety
Titan Industries Limited
Hosur-635126
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The response provided is accurate and offers valuable insights into establishing KRAs for safety officers within a manufacturing setting. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Zero reportable accidents teach us that accidents or incidents should not be hidden to achieve Key Result Areas (KRAs). Even management may support concealing incidents. Remember, safety Key Result Areas (KRAs) are crucial for the company's reputation.
It is corrected to - Aim for Zero Accidents. All incidents must be reported, and corrective actions need to be taken, not just corrections. As correctly stated by Mr. Feroz and Mr. Durairaj, focus initially on Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs), Occupational Safety and Environmental Management Procedures (OSEMP), and functional procedures such as the work permit system. Establish and execute these procedures first. Suggest pursuing more than 8 elements of Process Safety Management (PSM) this year, with the remaining 6 to be addressed next year. Engage with the Safety Head, as they are likely eager to implement safety standards and foster a safe working environment. Allow them to define their KRAs rather than preparing them for them. Request them to present their KRAs and a minimum of 5 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each KRA.
Remember not to excessively interfere with Health, Safety, Environment, and Fire (HSEF) functions, as their planning is vital, given their professional qualifications and experience.
Regards
From United States
Acknowledge(2)
Amend(0)
It is corrected to - Aim for Zero Accidents. All incidents must be reported, and corrective actions need to be taken, not just corrections. As correctly stated by Mr. Feroz and Mr. Durairaj, focus initially on Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs), Occupational Safety and Environmental Management Procedures (OSEMP), and functional procedures such as the work permit system. Establish and execute these procedures first. Suggest pursuing more than 8 elements of Process Safety Management (PSM) this year, with the remaining 6 to be addressed next year. Engage with the Safety Head, as they are likely eager to implement safety standards and foster a safe working environment. Allow them to define their KRAs rather than preparing them for them. Request them to present their KRAs and a minimum of 5 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each KRA.
Remember not to excessively interfere with Health, Safety, Environment, and Fire (HSEF) functions, as their planning is vital, given their professional qualifications and experience.
Regards
From United States
Acknowledge(2)Amend(0)
Dear,
In my opinion, your safety officer is very correct because he is not the person who has the overall control over the activity. A single person cannot be held responsible for the unsafe conditions present in the plant and the unsafe human behavior of a person.
Secondly, as per the Factories Act 1948, the role of a safety officer is only an advisory role. He can be aware, identify, and advise about the potential hazards which can lead to any mishap. Implementation is not his responsibility.
Regards,
S. Singh
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In my opinion, your safety officer is very correct because he is not the person who has the overall control over the activity. A single person cannot be held responsible for the unsafe conditions present in the plant and the unsafe human behavior of a person.
Secondly, as per the Factories Act 1948, the role of a safety officer is only an advisory role. He can be aware, identify, and advise about the potential hazards which can lead to any mishap. Implementation is not his responsibility.
Regards,
S. Singh
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
@ Abhay
My comments on your posting:
You must take safety as a part of KRA for both Safety Professionals as well as Line Engineers/Managers, as it's the responsibility of all—not only the job of a safety officer.
For Safety Professionals, you can set the following KRAs:
1. Assisting management in preventing accidents (Give different ratings for fatal, reportable, etc.).
2. Assisting management in the investigation of all incidents, report making, and ensuring the implementation of recommendations.
3. Giving training on HSE (Make an action plan for all required training at the beginning of the financial year. At year-end, compare it with actual training provided and give ratings accordingly).
4. Assisting the management in maintaining a safe working environment at the plant (Audit of the entire plant—maybe once every six months or annually, site inspections, etc.).
5. Statutory compliance of the entire plant.
6. Strengthening the safety management system by placing necessary visuals at strategic locations, ensuring testing of all lifting tools and tackles, etc.
7. Strengthening the contract safety management by adhering to site-specific guidelines, etc.
For line engineers:
1. Self-conducting internal audits of their sections, identifying and rectifying points (specify a timeframe, e.g., monthly, and give ratings accordingly).
2. Number of incidents at the site: Give ratings based on the following classification:
2.1 Near miss
2.2 First Aid
2.3 Non-reportable
2.4 Reportable
2.5 Fatal
3. Reporting incidents. If anyone fails to report, give a rating accordingly.
4. Creating Safe Operating Procedures in coordination with the safety department and displaying them at the site (Set targets and give ratings by analyzing targets versus completion).
5. Conducting Toolbox Talks regularly, etc.
With regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(1)
Amend(0)
0
0
My comments on your posting:
You must take safety as a part of KRA for both Safety Professionals as well as Line Engineers/Managers, as it's the responsibility of all—not only the job of a safety officer.
For Safety Professionals, you can set the following KRAs:
1. Assisting management in preventing accidents (Give different ratings for fatal, reportable, etc.).
2. Assisting management in the investigation of all incidents, report making, and ensuring the implementation of recommendations.
3. Giving training on HSE (Make an action plan for all required training at the beginning of the financial year. At year-end, compare it with actual training provided and give ratings accordingly).
4. Assisting the management in maintaining a safe working environment at the plant (Audit of the entire plant—maybe once every six months or annually, site inspections, etc.).
5. Statutory compliance of the entire plant.
6. Strengthening the safety management system by placing necessary visuals at strategic locations, ensuring testing of all lifting tools and tackles, etc.
7. Strengthening the contract safety management by adhering to site-specific guidelines, etc.
For line engineers:
1. Self-conducting internal audits of their sections, identifying and rectifying points (specify a timeframe, e.g., monthly, and give ratings accordingly).
2. Number of incidents at the site: Give ratings based on the following classification:
2.1 Near miss
2.2 First Aid
2.3 Non-reportable
2.4 Reportable
2.5 Fatal
3. Reporting incidents. If anyone fails to report, give a rating accordingly.
4. Creating Safe Operating Procedures in coordination with the safety department and displaying them at the site (Set targets and give ratings by analyzing targets versus completion).
5. Conducting Toolbox Talks regularly, etc.
With regards,
Dipil Kumar V
From India
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The user's reply provides comprehensive and accurate suggestions for KRAs for both Safety Professionals and Line Engineers, aligning with the shared responsibilities. Well done! (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Dear All,
Thank you very much. Your posts will help me a lot. One doubt in my mind is how I can measure safety culture. If one of the Key Result Areas (KRAs) is "Develop Safety Culture in Plant," is accident frequency the only measuring tool used?
Waiting for a kind reply.
Regards,
Abhay
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
0
0
Thank you very much. Your posts will help me a lot. One doubt in my mind is how I can measure safety culture. If one of the Key Result Areas (KRAs) is "Develop Safety Culture in Plant," is accident frequency the only measuring tool used?
Waiting for a kind reply.
Regards,
Abhay
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The main key performance indicator (KRA) for the safety officer in the manufacturing sector should align with achievable and measurable goals within their control. Safety culture measurement should include various metrics beyond just accident frequency. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Set the KRAs for individuals as follows:
1. One individual will be responsible for overseeing the fire extinguishers.
2. Another individual will be in charge of minor accidents and their maintenance. Their KRA will involve reducing the frequency of minor accidents through corrective actions.
3. The Safety Head will oversee major accidents by conducting investigations and timely meetings. Ratings will be based on the corrective actions taken, and the target will be to decrease the frequency of such accidents.
Ensure there is a single line break between paragraphs.
From India, Mangaluru
Acknowledge(1)
Amend(0)
0
0
1. One individual will be responsible for overseeing the fire extinguishers.
2. Another individual will be in charge of minor accidents and their maintenance. Their KRA will involve reducing the frequency of minor accidents through corrective actions.
3. The Safety Head will oversee major accidents by conducting investigations and timely meetings. Ratings will be based on the corrective actions taken, and the target will be to decrease the frequency of such accidents.
Ensure there is a single line break between paragraphs.
From India, Mangaluru
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The suggested KRAs for the safety department align well with best practices. The division of responsibilities and focus on different aspects of safety management is effective and comprehensive. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The statement regarding setting Key Result Areas (KRA) for the safety department and safety officer is generally accurate. However, it's crucial to note that while safety officers play a vital role in promoting a safe workplace, achieving and maintaining zero accidents is a collective responsibility across all levels of the organization. It's essential to set KRAs that are realistic and achievable while considering the safety department's functions and activities. Overall, the response provides a good understanding of KRA setting for safety departments. (1 Acknowledge point)