"Difference between Domestic Inquiry & Internal Committee Inquiry"
---
This text seems to be a title or topic heading, so it's brief and to the point. However, a clearer structure can be achieved by using proper capitalization. Here's a revised version:
"Difference Between Domestic Inquiry and Internal Committee Inquiry"
---
If you have any more content to share or need further assistance, feel free to provide additional information.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
214---
This text seems to be a title or topic heading, so it's brief and to the point. However, a clearer structure can be achieved by using proper capitalization. Here's a revised version:
"Difference Between Domestic Inquiry and Internal Committee Inquiry"
---
If you have any more content to share or need further assistance, feel free to provide additional information.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Key Differences between Domestic Inquiry and Internal Committee Inquiry
🔍 Nature of Body
- Internal Committees (ICs) are permanent legal bodies, whereas Domestic Inquiry Officers/Committees work on an ad hoc basis.
🔍 Duration of Inquiry
- Inquiries by ICs must be concluded within 90 days, while Domestic Inquiries must be completed within 180 days, and exceptionally within 365 days in rare cases as ruled by the Supreme Court.
🔍 Tenure of Members
- IC members are nominated to serve for up to 3 years, whereas Domestic Inquiry Officers/Committees serve only until the inquiry is over.
🔍 Powers
- ICs have powers similar to Civil Courts, unlike Domestic Inquiry Officers/Committees who do not have such powers.
🔍 Composition
- ICs typically consist of 4 members, whereas Domestic Inquiry Officers are single individuals, and Inquiry Committees often have 2 members.
🔍 Presence of Women at Senior Level
- ICs must have a woman employee at a senior level as the Presiding Officer, which is not a requirement for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Gender Representation
- 50% of IC members must be women employees, whereas there is no such provision for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Binding Decisions
- ICs' findings are final and binding on employers, while the same does not hold true for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Compensation and Conciliation
- ICs are empowered to determine and recommend compensation claimed by aggrieved women and can initiate conciliation, whereas Inquiry Officers/Committees do not have these powers.
🔍 Reporting Requirements
- ICs must file an annual report before the District Officer for the calendar year, whereas there is no such requirement for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Employee Deployment
- ICs have the authority to recommend the deployment elsewhere of aggrieved employees or respondents during ongoing inquiries, which is not within the scope of Inquiry Officers/Committees.
This detailed breakdown distinguishes the significant disparities between Domestic Inquiry and Internal Committee Inquiry, providing employers, management, and IC members with a clear understanding of their respective roles and functions.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
🔍 Nature of Body
- Internal Committees (ICs) are permanent legal bodies, whereas Domestic Inquiry Officers/Committees work on an ad hoc basis.
🔍 Duration of Inquiry
- Inquiries by ICs must be concluded within 90 days, while Domestic Inquiries must be completed within 180 days, and exceptionally within 365 days in rare cases as ruled by the Supreme Court.
🔍 Tenure of Members
- IC members are nominated to serve for up to 3 years, whereas Domestic Inquiry Officers/Committees serve only until the inquiry is over.
🔍 Powers
- ICs have powers similar to Civil Courts, unlike Domestic Inquiry Officers/Committees who do not have such powers.
🔍 Composition
- ICs typically consist of 4 members, whereas Domestic Inquiry Officers are single individuals, and Inquiry Committees often have 2 members.
🔍 Presence of Women at Senior Level
- ICs must have a woman employee at a senior level as the Presiding Officer, which is not a requirement for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Gender Representation
- 50% of IC members must be women employees, whereas there is no such provision for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Binding Decisions
- ICs' findings are final and binding on employers, while the same does not hold true for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Compensation and Conciliation
- ICs are empowered to determine and recommend compensation claimed by aggrieved women and can initiate conciliation, whereas Inquiry Officers/Committees do not have these powers.
🔍 Reporting Requirements
- ICs must file an annual report before the District Officer for the calendar year, whereas there is no such requirement for Inquiry Officers/Committees.
🔍 Employee Deployment
- ICs have the authority to recommend the deployment elsewhere of aggrieved employees or respondents during ongoing inquiries, which is not within the scope of Inquiry Officers/Committees.
This detailed breakdown distinguishes the significant disparities between Domestic Inquiry and Internal Committee Inquiry, providing employers, management, and IC members with a clear understanding of their respective roles and functions.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Register and Log In.
Domestic Inquiry.pdf
People make the difference….ppt
Internal motivation comes from within.doc