On 17 December 2025, a young woman doctor pursuing her MD in pathology at King George’s Medical University in Lucknow reportedly tried to end her life in her hostel room by taking an overdose of medicines. Over the following days, her family alleged that a senior resident in the same department had subjected her to sustained harassment, threats and pressure to convert to his religion for marriage. By 23 December, the university’s internal complaints committee, set up under its Vishakha Committee framework, had submitted its report, and the accused doctor was suspended and barred from entering campus. An FIR has been filed, the state government has sought a detailed report, and a police officer has been posted round the clock for the resident’s protection, even as she continues to recover from both medical and psychological trauma.
Inside medical hostels and teaching hospitals, this incident has sparked very private but intense conversations. Women residents already juggling brutal duty hours and academic pressure talk about how hard it is to complain against seniors who control postings, recommendations and exam evaluations. The idea that a colleague could allegedly run a “gang” to coerce conversions, while a victim slips into such despair that she attempts suicide, has shaken trust in informal support systems. Many students are now asking whether PoSH sessions that are treated as box ticking exercises actually empower them to say no, record evidence and seek help early. For HR and deans, the emotional reality is that even one such case can turn a prestigious campus into a place associated with fear, gossip and whispered warnings to incoming batches.
Legally, the case sits at the junction of the PoSH Act 2013, institutional service rules and state criminal law, including Uttar Pradesh’s statute on unlawful religious conversion. Once a written complaint is made, the employer is obligated to ensure a neutral Internal Committee, protect the complainant from retaliation, and implement interim measures like separation, leave and counselling. A Vishakha style committee that only reacts after a suicide attempt or media attention is not fulfilling either the spirit or the letter of the law. Hospitals and universities need robust, well publicised multi channel reporting, fast tracked inquiries, and clear protocols for criminal escalation, all documented and auditable. For HR and academic leaders across India, this is a loud warning to review PoSH training, IC composition and campus safety policies, not just for compliance certificates but to prevent the next tragedy.
If you were an HR or academic head, how would you make it safer for residents and students to complain early without fear of career damage?
What checks would you build so that Internal Committees act quickly and fairly, rather than only after a case explodes in the media?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7Inside medical hostels and teaching hospitals, this incident has sparked very private but intense conversations. Women residents already juggling brutal duty hours and academic pressure talk about how hard it is to complain against seniors who control postings, recommendations and exam evaluations. The idea that a colleague could allegedly run a “gang” to coerce conversions, while a victim slips into such despair that she attempts suicide, has shaken trust in informal support systems. Many students are now asking whether PoSH sessions that are treated as box ticking exercises actually empower them to say no, record evidence and seek help early. For HR and deans, the emotional reality is that even one such case can turn a prestigious campus into a place associated with fear, gossip and whispered warnings to incoming batches.
Legally, the case sits at the junction of the PoSH Act 2013, institutional service rules and state criminal law, including Uttar Pradesh’s statute on unlawful religious conversion. Once a written complaint is made, the employer is obligated to ensure a neutral Internal Committee, protect the complainant from retaliation, and implement interim measures like separation, leave and counselling. A Vishakha style committee that only reacts after a suicide attempt or media attention is not fulfilling either the spirit or the letter of the law. Hospitals and universities need robust, well publicised multi channel reporting, fast tracked inquiries, and clear protocols for criminal escalation, all documented and auditable. For HR and academic leaders across India, this is a loud warning to review PoSH training, IC composition and campus safety policies, not just for compliance certificates but to prevent the next tragedy.
If you were an HR or academic head, how would you make it safer for residents and students to complain early without fear of career damage?
What checks would you build so that Internal Committees act quickly and fairly, rather than only after a case explodes in the media?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The issue at hand is the fear of career damage that prevents students and residents from reporting harassment early. This fear is compounded by the perceived lack of swift and fair action from Internal Committees unless the case gains media attention.
Legally, under the PoSH Act 2013, the employer is obligated to ensure a neutral Internal Committee, protect the complainant from retaliation, and implement interim measures such as separation, leave, and counselling. However, these provisions need to be effectively communicated and implemented to create a safe environment for reporting harassment.
As an HR or academic head, the first step would be to create a culture of trust and openness. This can be achieved by conducting regular awareness sessions about the PoSH Act, the role of the Internal Committee, and the process of lodging a complaint. It's crucial to emphasize that the institution takes every complaint seriously and that there will be no retaliation against the complainant.
Secondly, the Internal Committee should be made more accessible and approachable. This can be done by having representatives from different levels of the hierarchy, including junior staff and students. The committee should also have a clear, well-publicised procedure for lodging complaints and should ensure confidentiality.
Thirdly, the process of investigation needs to be expedited. A timeline should be established for each stage of the investigation, from the lodging of the complaint to the final decision. This will ensure that cases don't drag on indefinitely, which can discourage victims from coming forward.
Fourthly, interim measures such as separation, leave, and counselling should be implemented immediately after a complaint is lodged. This will protect the complainant from further harassment and retaliation.
Lastly, there should be a robust system for monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the PoSH policy and the Internal Committee. This could involve regular audits, feedback from staff and students, and revisions of the policy as needed.
In conclusion, creating a safe environment for reporting harassment requires a combination of legal compliance, effective communication, and a commitment to creating a culture of trust and respect. It's not enough to have policies in place; they need to be effectively implemented and regularly reviewed to ensure they are serving their intended purpose.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Legally, under the PoSH Act 2013, the employer is obligated to ensure a neutral Internal Committee, protect the complainant from retaliation, and implement interim measures such as separation, leave, and counselling. However, these provisions need to be effectively communicated and implemented to create a safe environment for reporting harassment.
As an HR or academic head, the first step would be to create a culture of trust and openness. This can be achieved by conducting regular awareness sessions about the PoSH Act, the role of the Internal Committee, and the process of lodging a complaint. It's crucial to emphasize that the institution takes every complaint seriously and that there will be no retaliation against the complainant.
Secondly, the Internal Committee should be made more accessible and approachable. This can be done by having representatives from different levels of the hierarchy, including junior staff and students. The committee should also have a clear, well-publicised procedure for lodging complaints and should ensure confidentiality.
Thirdly, the process of investigation needs to be expedited. A timeline should be established for each stage of the investigation, from the lodging of the complaint to the final decision. This will ensure that cases don't drag on indefinitely, which can discourage victims from coming forward.
Fourthly, interim measures such as separation, leave, and counselling should be implemented immediately after a complaint is lodged. This will protect the complainant from further harassment and retaliation.
Lastly, there should be a robust system for monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the PoSH policy and the Internal Committee. This could involve regular audits, feedback from staff and students, and revisions of the policy as needed.
In conclusion, creating a safe environment for reporting harassment requires a combination of legal compliance, effective communication, and a commitment to creating a culture of trust and respect. It's not enough to have policies in place; they need to be effectively implemented and regularly reviewed to ensure they are serving their intended purpose.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Fear & Challenges in Career Development.pps
Ladder Safety Tips.zip