Hello Everyone,
As someone deeply interested in how HR is evolving in today's fast-paced business environment, I wanted to open a discussion on something that's been on my mind lately:
Are traditional annual performance appraisals becoming obsolete in the age of agility and continuous feedback?
With more organizations embracing agile work cultures, flatter hierarchies, and hybrid teams, the idea of waiting a full year to provide structured feedback seems outdated. Yet, many companies still stick to this model, perhaps due to legacy systems, regulatory needs, or sheer habit.
Some points I’d love to hear your thoughts on:
Have you or your organization moved away from annual reviews? If yes, what has worked or not worked?
Can continuous feedback fully replace formal appraisals?
How do we balance agility with accountability?
What role does technology play in evolving performance management?
Would love to hear perspectives from different industries and geographies. Looking forward to learning from this community!
Warm regards,
Asha Kanta Sharma
From India, Guwahati
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
As someone deeply interested in how HR is evolving in today's fast-paced business environment, I wanted to open a discussion on something that's been on my mind lately:
Are traditional annual performance appraisals becoming obsolete in the age of agility and continuous feedback?
With more organizations embracing agile work cultures, flatter hierarchies, and hybrid teams, the idea of waiting a full year to provide structured feedback seems outdated. Yet, many companies still stick to this model, perhaps due to legacy systems, regulatory needs, or sheer habit.
Some points I’d love to hear your thoughts on:
Have you or your organization moved away from annual reviews? If yes, what has worked or not worked?
Can continuous feedback fully replace formal appraisals?
How do we balance agility with accountability?
What role does technology play in evolving performance management?
Would love to hear perspectives from different industries and geographies. Looking forward to learning from this community!
Warm regards,
Asha Kanta Sharma
From India, Guwahati
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hello Asha,
Your question is indeed relevant in today's dynamic business environment. Here are my thoughts:
- Many organizations are indeed moving away from traditional annual reviews. Instead, they are adopting a more continuous approach to performance management. This shift has been driven by the need for more frequent feedback and the desire to create a more engaged and agile workforce. However, the success of this approach can vary depending on the organization's culture, leadership, and the tools used to facilitate continuous feedback.
- Continuous feedback can complement formal appraisals but may not entirely replace them. Formal appraisals provide a structured way to assess performance against set objectives, which is essential for strategic planning and decision-making. However, continuous feedback can enhance this process by providing real-time insights into performance, thereby enabling timely interventions and adjustments.
- Balancing agility with accountability can be achieved by clearly defining roles, responsibilities, and expectations. This clarity enables employees to understand what is expected of them and how their performance will be assessed. Agile practices such as regular stand-ups and retrospectives can also foster accountability by encouraging open communication and transparency.
- Technology plays a crucial role in evolving performance management. Performance management tools can facilitate continuous feedback, goal setting, and tracking, making the process more efficient and effective. These tools can also provide analytics and insights that can inform decision-making and strategy.
In conclusion, while traditional performance appraisals may seem outdated in today's fast-paced business environment, they still have a role to play. The key is to integrate them with continuous feedback and agile practices to create a more holistic and effective performance management system.
I hope this provides some clarity on your query.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
40Your question is indeed relevant in today's dynamic business environment. Here are my thoughts:
- Many organizations are indeed moving away from traditional annual reviews. Instead, they are adopting a more continuous approach to performance management. This shift has been driven by the need for more frequent feedback and the desire to create a more engaged and agile workforce. However, the success of this approach can vary depending on the organization's culture, leadership, and the tools used to facilitate continuous feedback.
- Continuous feedback can complement formal appraisals but may not entirely replace them. Formal appraisals provide a structured way to assess performance against set objectives, which is essential for strategic planning and decision-making. However, continuous feedback can enhance this process by providing real-time insights into performance, thereby enabling timely interventions and adjustments.
- Balancing agility with accountability can be achieved by clearly defining roles, responsibilities, and expectations. This clarity enables employees to understand what is expected of them and how their performance will be assessed. Agile practices such as regular stand-ups and retrospectives can also foster accountability by encouraging open communication and transparency.
- Technology plays a crucial role in evolving performance management. Performance management tools can facilitate continuous feedback, goal setting, and tracking, making the process more efficient and effective. These tools can also provide analytics and insights that can inform decision-making and strategy.
In conclusion, while traditional performance appraisals may seem outdated in today's fast-paced business environment, they still have a role to play. The key is to integrate them with continuous feedback and agile practices to create a more holistic and effective performance management system.
I hope this provides some clarity on your query.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Asha Kanta Sharma,
Thanks for raising a topic for discussion on the relevance of the traditional performance appraisal. The essence of online forums like Citehr lies in debating these topics rather than restricted questions and answers on the service function of HR.
Your question is: Are traditional annual performance appraisals becoming obsolete in the age of agility and continuous feedback?
Saying that the traditional annual performance appraisals (PAs) have become obsolete is a sweeping statement. Though the PAs remain traditional, rather than conducting it once a year, their frequency has increased. Many companies measure performance quarterly or half-yearly.
The exact reason for increasing frequency may not be agility. One of the dictionary definitions of agile is: a method of project management (esp. software development), having short flexible work phases with regular adaption of plans as required to complete the work. However, not all organisations are agile. In service organisations, the operations are repetitive, hence, there is no room for agility. The same is the case of manufacturing organisations where the production happens in the assembly lines.
Whether the organisation is agile or not, the performance of the organisation has to be measured. However, the organisation does not perform in itself; people working in the organisation perform. This is the cause of the measurement of the performance of the people.
Furthermore, a few ratios, such as the Inventory Turnover Ratio (ITR) or Human Capital Return On Investment (HCROI), cannot be measured quarterly or half-yearly. These need to be measured annually. Given this, even though the organisation conducts the PAs quarterly, certain KRAs need to be measured annually.
Your next question is: How do we balance agility with accountability?
Accountability means answerability. The employees remain answerable irrespective of the industry they work in or the method of operations the organisation has. Answerability is the foundation on which the employer-employee relationships rest. Therefore, there cannot be a trade-off, whatever the reason may be.
Your last question is: What role does technology play in evolving performance management?
Technology plays a vital role in performance measurement. If the measurement is automated, then the employees do not have to maintain manual records of their performance. Secondly, the records of the current and past employees can be stored which, in turn, helps in comparing the performance. Thirdly, easy accessibility to the past records of performance saves time as well.
However, it is important to note that technology is a facilitator. The final decision of what to measure, when to measure, what targets to be given, etc., rests with the humans.
You have also written about continuous feedback. Feedback is part and parcel of the PA. However, what happens after feedback or whether the expected change happens or not has to be measured. Hence, feedback alone cannot be a substitute for the PA.
My Observations: - I have established a Performance Management System (PMS) in many organisations. After providing consulting services across a spectrum of industries, I found that whatever the system may be, the effectiveness of the system demands identifying the costs and ratios associated with the business and assigning them to the respective HOD. Many organisations miss out on the measurements which are crucial to their business. Therefore, rather than deriving pleasure from playing with the jargon, it is imperative to focus on the essence of the measurement!
I once again thank you for bringing this topic for the discussion and I look forward to having more such discussions.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Thanks for raising a topic for discussion on the relevance of the traditional performance appraisal. The essence of online forums like Citehr lies in debating these topics rather than restricted questions and answers on the service function of HR.
Your question is: Are traditional annual performance appraisals becoming obsolete in the age of agility and continuous feedback?
Saying that the traditional annual performance appraisals (PAs) have become obsolete is a sweeping statement. Though the PAs remain traditional, rather than conducting it once a year, their frequency has increased. Many companies measure performance quarterly or half-yearly.
The exact reason for increasing frequency may not be agility. One of the dictionary definitions of agile is: a method of project management (esp. software development), having short flexible work phases with regular adaption of plans as required to complete the work. However, not all organisations are agile. In service organisations, the operations are repetitive, hence, there is no room for agility. The same is the case of manufacturing organisations where the production happens in the assembly lines.
Whether the organisation is agile or not, the performance of the organisation has to be measured. However, the organisation does not perform in itself; people working in the organisation perform. This is the cause of the measurement of the performance of the people.
Furthermore, a few ratios, such as the Inventory Turnover Ratio (ITR) or Human Capital Return On Investment (HCROI), cannot be measured quarterly or half-yearly. These need to be measured annually. Given this, even though the organisation conducts the PAs quarterly, certain KRAs need to be measured annually.
Your next question is: How do we balance agility with accountability?
Accountability means answerability. The employees remain answerable irrespective of the industry they work in or the method of operations the organisation has. Answerability is the foundation on which the employer-employee relationships rest. Therefore, there cannot be a trade-off, whatever the reason may be.
Your last question is: What role does technology play in evolving performance management?
Technology plays a vital role in performance measurement. If the measurement is automated, then the employees do not have to maintain manual records of their performance. Secondly, the records of the current and past employees can be stored which, in turn, helps in comparing the performance. Thirdly, easy accessibility to the past records of performance saves time as well.
However, it is important to note that technology is a facilitator. The final decision of what to measure, when to measure, what targets to be given, etc., rests with the humans.
You have also written about continuous feedback. Feedback is part and parcel of the PA. However, what happens after feedback or whether the expected change happens or not has to be measured. Hence, feedback alone cannot be a substitute for the PA.
My Observations: - I have established a Performance Management System (PMS) in many organisations. After providing consulting services across a spectrum of industries, I found that whatever the system may be, the effectiveness of the system demands identifying the costs and ratios associated with the business and assigning them to the respective HOD. Many organisations miss out on the measurements which are crucial to their business. Therefore, rather than deriving pleasure from playing with the jargon, it is imperative to focus on the essence of the measurement!
I once again thank you for bringing this topic for the discussion and I look forward to having more such discussions.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
360 Degree Feedback and performance Appraisal-Anil Arora.pdf
Performance Appraisal Form for Staff.doc
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Your insights on performance appraisals and the role of technology in performance management are accurate and well-articulated. Keep sharing your knowledge! (1 Acknowledge point)