Hi Seniors What is mean by 360 degree appraisal? will you explain me. And is it necessary to have 360 degree appraisal in organisation ? Isn’t it lengthy process ? Please explain me.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
3From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sure my dear....i have a complete solution for you....i have enclosed a document for your perusal and hope this will give the every possible answer of your question... Best of Luck
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
top class information provided about 360 degree in pdf format. In our company we have the MRF(multi rater feedback system) but we find it is of no use and it has damaged the feelings of the juniors.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
i want how implementation of 360 degree performance appraisal in aditya birla group happens? any documentation plz fwd me
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Nobody is showing how to calculate the results from the ratings
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It is a process where from top to bottom of hierarchy can analyse your performance and your appraise you accordingly.
From India, Secunderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Secunderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
how does 360 degree performance appraisal is implemented in wipro hyderabad?
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi! This subject matter keeps coming back. Since the creation of CiteHR by Sid in 2004, we have been discussing this 360-Degree Performance Appraisal System. And, this particular thread was first posted ten (10) years ago. Anyway, let me help out after 16 long years of endless discussion on this subject matter:
1) The 360-Degree Appraisal System is not an appraisal tool per se. It is simply a paradigm or framework for conducting or implementing the appraisal of employees in a company.
2) As a paradigm, the 360-Degree promotes the concept of "multiple raters" (multi-raters as mentioned by one above) compared with the traditional "single rater" (immediate superior) approach.
3) As a system that embraces the advantage of multiple raters, the 360-Degree suggests that all important contacts of the employee must be asked to rate the said employee's performance. The final rating that an employee gets will be the average of all the ratings given to the said employee.
4) The most common raters identified are: a) immediate superior, b) fellow employee, c) customer, d) subordinate employee, e) supplier.
5) The usual problems and/or issues raised in the 360-Degrees are the following: a) the correct and appropriate weight of each of the rater's ratings that would be acceptable to both the employee and the company; b) the length of time needed for its rollout and processing, especially when the company has thousands of employees; c) the correct "appraisal form" that will provide the most objective and valid rating scores to the employees in a particular industry.
Many of the above issues have not been properly discussed and addressed by the most ardent promoters of the 360-Degrees. There are some who think that simply accepting the idea of multiple raters is enough to be able to implement it. But those of us who have been setting up appraisal systems worldwide know that it is not that simple - like eating a cake or making coffee.
Best regards.
From Philippines, Parañaque
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1) The 360-Degree Appraisal System is not an appraisal tool per se. It is simply a paradigm or framework for conducting or implementing the appraisal of employees in a company.
2) As a paradigm, the 360-Degree promotes the concept of "multiple raters" (multi-raters as mentioned by one above) compared with the traditional "single rater" (immediate superior) approach.
3) As a system that embraces the advantage of multiple raters, the 360-Degree suggests that all important contacts of the employee must be asked to rate the said employee's performance. The final rating that an employee gets will be the average of all the ratings given to the said employee.
4) The most common raters identified are: a) immediate superior, b) fellow employee, c) customer, d) subordinate employee, e) supplier.
5) The usual problems and/or issues raised in the 360-Degrees are the following: a) the correct and appropriate weight of each of the rater's ratings that would be acceptable to both the employee and the company; b) the length of time needed for its rollout and processing, especially when the company has thousands of employees; c) the correct "appraisal form" that will provide the most objective and valid rating scores to the employees in a particular industry.
Many of the above issues have not been properly discussed and addressed by the most ardent promoters of the 360-Degrees. There are some who think that simply accepting the idea of multiple raters is enough to be able to implement it. But those of us who have been setting up appraisal systems worldwide know that it is not that simple - like eating a cake or making coffee.
Best regards.
From Philippines, Parañaque
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Topic: Performance Management System 360 Degree Technique
Time: Apr 30, 2020, 05:00 PM India
Join Zoom Meeting at the following link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/8658448460...VFTHdaeVZ1QT09
Meeting ID: 865 8448 4607
Password: 6HGDFg
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Time: Apr 30, 2020, 05:00 PM India
Join Zoom Meeting at the following link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/8658448460...VFTHdaeVZ1QT09
Meeting ID: 865 8448 4607
Password: 6HGDFg
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Maruti adopts `360 degree' appraisal system.doc