Hi Seniors,
Please help me to resolve the below-mentioned case with your valuable thoughts and also refer me to some relevant judgments available regarding this.
One of our employees was on a direct contract with us for 6 months. After the 6 months of the contract, he worked with us on a third-party payroll for 3 years, and after that, he was absorbed as an on-roll employee of the company and worked for 2.6 years before leaving the company.
Now, my query is whether this employee is eligible for Gratuity. Please share your opinion and any valid documents/judgments available with you.
Thanks,
Chatar Singh
From India
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Please help me to resolve the below-mentioned case with your valuable thoughts and also refer me to some relevant judgments available regarding this.
One of our employees was on a direct contract with us for 6 months. After the 6 months of the contract, he worked with us on a third-party payroll for 3 years, and after that, he was absorbed as an on-roll employee of the company and worked for 2.6 years before leaving the company.
Now, my query is whether this employee is eligible for Gratuity. Please share your opinion and any valid documents/judgments available with you.
Thanks,
Chatar Singh
From India
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
No. Not Eligible as per provision of continuous service in the Act.
From India, Karjat
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Karjat
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi,
There was no mention of in-between breaks in the above-mentioned periods.
As the employee worked with you on third-party payroll for 3 years, he is not eligible for Gratuity.
While his initial stint with the company for 0.6 months and last employment period of 2.6 years is okay, 3 years on third-party payroll stands distinct.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1153There was no mention of in-between breaks in the above-mentioned periods.
As the employee worked with you on third-party payroll for 3 years, he is not eligible for Gratuity.
While his initial stint with the company for 0.6 months and last employment period of 2.6 years is okay, 3 years on third-party payroll stands distinct.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Initial service on direct contract, whether it is on a regular basis or Fixed Term Contract, is 0-06 months. Subsequent service on third party payroll (probably with his consent) is 3 years. Service rendered after absorption as an on-roll employee before leaving is 2 years and 6 months. The total service rendered in the organization is 6 years.
However, he has not completed the minimum qualifying service of 5 continuous years in any of the different modes of employment, namely FTC, Off-roll, or On-roll. Thus, although the establishment is the same and the total service is 6 years, the intermittent changes in his modes of employment render him ineligible to stake a claim for gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, unless there is a specific clause for regularization in the absorption orders to include the past service.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
However, he has not completed the minimum qualifying service of 5 continuous years in any of the different modes of employment, namely FTC, Off-roll, or On-roll. Thus, although the establishment is the same and the total service is 6 years, the intermittent changes in his modes of employment render him ineligible to stake a claim for gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, unless there is a specific clause for regularization in the absorption orders to include the past service.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I appreciate the comments by Umakanthan Sir. However, I feel that the act of the employer putting the employee under a third party role was not a genuine attempt but merely a sham arrangement. If the employee could prove that during that period, he was supervised by company employees, I believe he would be entitled to gratuity considering his length of service. It is also noteworthy that after a three-year gap under a third party role, the company absorbed him into regular rolls. Do you not think that there was something that could render the three-year contract employment a sham?
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The employee is eligible for the gratuity because he has rendered 6 years of service in your establishment.
There is no such thing as a third-party payroll. If someone was working with another paymaster, what prompted you to absorb them into your company's payroll?
To provide better suggestions, please provide the timeline of the employee (6-month contract from - to, third party from - to, and on the payroll from - to).
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
There is no such thing as a third-party payroll. If someone was working with another paymaster, what prompted you to absorb them into your company's payroll?
To provide better suggestions, please provide the timeline of the employee (6-month contract from - to, third party from - to, and on the payroll from - to).
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I agree with you, Madhu. At the outset, such a concern arose in my mind too on reading the narrative. However, I preferred to answer the query as it is rather than reading in between the lines. That's why I added the caveat of regularization of the different spells of service prior to the employee's absorption.
Generally, many questioners do not reveal the real story in its entirety, prompting their questions. But, being outsiders, we do not know the actual reasons for such shuffling. In such a situation, we have to believe that the arrangements are a gentlemen's agreement and the changes were made with the active consideration and consent of the employee concerned, though it can be termed as an unfair labor practice on the part of the employer.
After all, gratuity is a reward for long and blemishless service in the same establishment to an employee, and a statutory obligation on the part of the employer upon termination of employment. Let good sense prevail over the employer in case of a disputed claim for gratuity or even otherwise!
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Generally, many questioners do not reveal the real story in its entirety, prompting their questions. But, being outsiders, we do not know the actual reasons for such shuffling. In such a situation, we have to believe that the arrangements are a gentlemen's agreement and the changes were made with the active consideration and consent of the employee concerned, though it can be termed as an unfair labor practice on the part of the employer.
After all, gratuity is a reward for long and blemishless service in the same establishment to an employee, and a statutory obligation on the part of the employer upon termination of employment. Let good sense prevail over the employer in case of a disputed claim for gratuity or even otherwise!
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
If the vendor changes and the worker remains the same, and he has completed five years, will we give him gratuity or not as a principal employer?
Please suggest me.
Amod Kumar Singh
Manager - HR
From India, Vadodara
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If the vendor changes and the worker remains the same, and he has completed five years, will we give him gratuity or not as a principal employer?
Please suggest me.
Amod Kumar Singh
Manager - HR
From India, Vadodara
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Mr. Amod Kr Singh,
The act and rules state that if one extends five years of continuous service, they are eligible to receive Gratuity upon their exit from the employer. If a worker is employed under a contractor, then gratuity is payable by the contractor. In cases where the contractor fails to make the payment, the liability falls upon the Principal Employer.
It doesn't matter if the worker has served over five years in one establishment without interruption or breaks in service; they are still eligible for gratuity, even if vendors changed during their employment period. It is advisable to request all vendors under whom the worker was engaged to pay proportionately for the period of work. As the Principal Employer, you should pay the amount to the worker and then recover it from the vendors' bills. I hope this clarifies your question.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The act and rules state that if one extends five years of continuous service, they are eligible to receive Gratuity upon their exit from the employer. If a worker is employed under a contractor, then gratuity is payable by the contractor. In cases where the contractor fails to make the payment, the liability falls upon the Principal Employer.
It doesn't matter if the worker has served over five years in one establishment without interruption or breaks in service; they are still eligible for gratuity, even if vendors changed during their employment period. It is advisable to request all vendors under whom the worker was engaged to pay proportionately for the period of work. As the Principal Employer, you should pay the amount to the worker and then recover it from the vendors' bills. I hope this clarifies your question.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Register and Log In.
Gratuity Eligibility.pdf
Travel eligibility - amended.doc
Pfloan-eligibil ity.xls