Employee completed the Full and Final (FNF) settlement in front of the Accounts and Legal (ACL) department two years ago. Now, he is claiming that he settled for a lower amount and that he should receive more based on certain rules he recently learned about. Additionally, he asserts that Provident Fund (PF) contributions were not provided to him for certain periods during which he was employed. These discrepancies were supposedly resolved and settled in full at the ACL office. What decisions should the firm make at this point?
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear member,
I wish you had given sufficient information. If the FnF has been done and that too under the aegis of ACL, then why has the ex-employee approached your company once again? Have you analyzed the validity of his claim? Are the claims tenable?
If the claims are not tenable, then you may give him a point-by-point reply. Send the letter by Speed Post and preserve the correspondence along with the Speed Post receipts carefully.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I wish you had given sufficient information. If the FnF has been done and that too under the aegis of ACL, then why has the ex-employee approached your company once again? Have you analyzed the validity of his claim? Are the claims tenable?
If the claims are not tenable, then you may give him a point-by-point reply. Send the letter by Speed Post and preserve the correspondence along with the Speed Post receipts carefully.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Security Amount Proof.docx
Steps to transfer PF amount.jpg
PF Amount Balance Check.xls