No Tags Found!

If any employee works for 3 years on a contract, will he/she will become a permanent employee after completing 3 years?
From India, Palanpur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

When an initial appointment of an employee is made on a contract basis for a fixed period and the employee is retained as such further by virtue of the enabling provision for renewal, he/she would be a contract employee until the expiry of the final spell. Therefore, on the expiry of the contract, he has no locus standi to claim permanency in the establishment.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

KK!HR
1656

On completion of the contract period, if the employee continues, that in itself does not render regularization of service. For that, the process of regularization has to be gone through, and there should be an order.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear colleague,

I share the views of the learned colleagues on this subject.

However, the claim for permanency has merit only if the workman has worked continuously for 240 days and gets terminated, and another person is appointed in his place to do the same job. In other words, the job remains constant, but the person is changed with a view to dodge permanency.

This, however, does not apply to Fixed Term Employment category even though they may have worked for 240 days or more, as rightly pointed out by the learned colleagues.

Regards,
Vinayak Nagarkar
HR and Employee Relations Consultant

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

There are some employees work through contractor and some work on contract basis.

The employees working trough contractor shall claim for permanent employees provided the contract is sham & camouflage otherwise No.

The employee works in contract basis purely a time bound, the contract renewed after expiry of the each tenure. In this case the employee is binding by the contract so claim of permanency is remote expectation. The said employee/employees can request the managemnt to absorb in the post as the nature of job is of regular and permanent nature. The employee can refer the case as to his claim.
In the Supreme Court Of India Civil Appelete Jurisdiction Civil Appeal No . 1007 of 2021 University Of Delhi …Appelant (S) VERSUS
Delhi University Contract Employees Union & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S)
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1008 OF 2021 (Delhi University Contract Employees Union and anr. vs. University of Delhi and ors.)

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

keeping an employee on a contractual basis for three continuous years is not at all speaking good about the employer and their management..
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Colleague,

I beg to differ with Advocate Mr. Sundar.

Contractual appointments are generally used for project-based work such as construction or turnkey jobs. Often, project durations are extended due to unforeseen circumstances, leading to the need for extending the initial duration of the contractual appointment. This extension may occur on 2 to 3 occasions throughout the total span of the project. Therefore, all contractual appointments should not be perceived in a rigid manner as being inherently unfavorable. It is indeed inappropriate if such extensions are made with dubious intentions to circumvent the law.

Regards,

Vinayak Nagarkar
HR and Employee Relations Consultant

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi BMCRI,

I agree with all the observations of the members. For further clarity, please let us know the below details:

1. Are you a principal employer or contractor?
2. Have you given a contract agreement for three years, or do you renew it every year?
3. Do you employ the said contract employee even after the contract period has ended?
4. What is the nature of work of the contract employees?

From India, Kochi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear BMCRI,

It is difficult to give a proper answer without having details of the contract, period, and nature of work.

In general, if you have a contract to work for a fixed period, it will not give you a right to claim permanency. But at the same time, the nature of work and the provision of the Standing Orders may change the answer.

If the employment continues for long after the contract is over, then the employee can claim that he is made permanent (by action as he is being treated as a permanent employee) or that the original contract was a sham. That depends again on the contract, nature of work, and other factors.

Again, if it is a one-off or a regular feature among many such employees, it will decide which way the courts will go.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.