We have paid full salary for the month of March to all employees. Considering the present situation and also the fact that for another 3-4 months the company is not expecting even 50% of our production capacity, the orders may not be executable. It will be very difficult to manage running costs and also to pay full salaries. We would like to retain all staff, but paying full salary will be a great concern. If we reduce the salary for employees or some employees in writing for 4-5 months, is it legal or illegal? Please advise.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
10From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Mohan,
The current tussle between the judiciary and the government/legislators on withholding salaries and reducing salaries is itself an example that this is illegal, but given the circumstances, non-verbally considered as an accepted practice.
With an alarmingly reducing rate of investment and unemployment on the rise, the government is in a tough spot to take action against such companies, and they know it. The right way for a company to proceed on such practices would be to openly present losses being incurred and thus a lack of funds. These could be approved by the labor authorities, and then the proceedings could be taken forward as per the law. But obviously, we can see that this is not the case.
So, with a catch-22 situation, what seems good enough is to explain to the employees the losses that the company is incurring and then discuss with them on salary reduction factors or any other alternatives to avoid or reduce unemployment or loss of revenue. This creates a degree of fairness or perception of a degree of fairness.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The current tussle between the judiciary and the government/legislators on withholding salaries and reducing salaries is itself an example that this is illegal, but given the circumstances, non-verbally considered as an accepted practice.
With an alarmingly reducing rate of investment and unemployment on the rise, the government is in a tough spot to take action against such companies, and they know it. The right way for a company to proceed on such practices would be to openly present losses being incurred and thus a lack of funds. These could be approved by the labor authorities, and then the proceedings could be taken forward as per the law. But obviously, we can see that this is not the case.
So, with a catch-22 situation, what seems good enough is to explain to the employees the losses that the company is incurring and then discuss with them on salary reduction factors or any other alternatives to avoid or reduce unemployment or loss of revenue. This creates a degree of fairness or perception of a degree of fairness.
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Well said, Nelson. A "Catch-22" in industry and employment matters indicates a "lose-lose" situation which demands mutual sacrifices from all those involved. Interestingly, everyone placed involuntarily in such a situation has to be content with a lesser evil or necessary evil for the sake of survival. Therefore, the current universal lockdown and its inevitable impacts in the long run compel every stakeholder of societies to think in terms of survival only.
The employers stand only to choose between immediate closure or sustained break-even; the employees between unemployment or reduced earnings; the consumers between scarcity or rationed supplies at affordable prices; and the governments between economic bankruptcy or depression.
Hence, the need of the hour is the realization of the gravity of the situation and taking concerted efforts to recognize the difficulties of one another and act accordingly.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The employers stand only to choose between immediate closure or sustained break-even; the employees between unemployment or reduced earnings; the consumers between scarcity or rationed supplies at affordable prices; and the governments between economic bankruptcy or depression.
Hence, the need of the hour is the realization of the gravity of the situation and taking concerted efforts to recognize the difficulties of one another and act accordingly.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Defering the some part/portion of Due Wages/Salary till your Finances Stabilize can be discussed with Wage-Earners as Equal Partners as a Tide-Over Solutions Harsh K Sharan, Kritarth Team 5.5.20
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
This is an unexpected situation. The employers are not in a position to pay the expenses without having revenue. The employees are also in a very pathetic condition. But when we weigh the sorrows of both, the situation of employees weighs more than that of employers. Moreover, if the objective of the lockdown is making the people stay at home, which can only be achieved by offering salary for the days not worked, the period of the lockdown should be treated as paid days. Once the lockdown period is over, then you can have discussions with the employees and reach a solution for the months to come.
Deferring a portion of the salary would be an ideal solution. Reducing the salary of some employees is not proper, but you can think of reducing the salary of all employees.
Also read:
[Madhu T K: Liability of employers to pay salary during COVID-19 lockdown period](http://madhu-t-k.blogspot.com/2020/04/liability-of-employers-to-pay-salary.html)
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Deferring a portion of the salary would be an ideal solution. Reducing the salary of some employees is not proper, but you can think of reducing the salary of all employees.
Also read:
[Madhu T K: Liability of employers to pay salary during COVID-19 lockdown period](http://madhu-t-k.blogspot.com/2020/04/liability-of-employers-to-pay-salary.html)
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you to all for the information and for sharing knowledge.
The current situation is definitely leading to a financial crunch for companies that produce as per customers' requirements and not standard products. Most of the orders cannot be executed as customers are in a dilemma, which can lead to more losses for the company. There is also a preference to withhold/retain a portion of the salary, but it raises the question of how long this situation will last and when we will stabilize. At that time, when employees claim the retained salary, the company may not be in a position to pay the full retained amount. However, when the company starts doing well, it can provide good incentives to all employees.
In agreement with the employees, if reduced salaries are being paid, could there be any legal implications?
Regards,
Mohan
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The current situation is definitely leading to a financial crunch for companies that produce as per customers' requirements and not standard products. Most of the orders cannot be executed as customers are in a dilemma, which can lead to more losses for the company. There is also a preference to withhold/retain a portion of the salary, but it raises the question of how long this situation will last and when we will stabilize. At that time, when employees claim the retained salary, the company may not be in a position to pay the full retained amount. However, when the company starts doing well, it can provide good incentives to all employees.
In agreement with the employees, if reduced salaries are being paid, could there be any legal implications?
Regards,
Mohan
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.