Today, we send employment contracts (Offer Letters) or any HR documents to employees through the DocuSign tool. The document sent through the tool to the employee includes a log that proves the time the document was sent to the employee, the time the employee viewed it, and when they signed and submitted the document. This log summary should suffice as evidence in case of litigation, demonstrating that the employee accepted the document sent through the tool.
However, one of the employees has come back questioning that the signature is not his handwritten one but was picked from the options available in the tool, which differs from his manual signature. He mentioned that in case of disputes, he could file a case with the court stating that the document was not signed by him.
In this context, how should an organization take a stand?
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
4However, one of the employees has come back questioning that the signature is not his handwritten one but was picked from the options available in the tool, which differs from his manual signature. He mentioned that in case of disputes, he could file a case with the court stating that the document was not signed by him.
In this context, how should an organization take a stand?
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Kannan,
I expected that some of the members of this forum who are very computer savvy would be answering your question, but no one has done so thus far. Perhaps your post may have escaped their attention. Therefore, as I am not computer savvy, I would like to answer your query as a layman. In the face of increasing cybercrimes, it would be better to limit the use of e-signatures in documents that can be contested about their veracity by anyone later.
Even the Information Technology Act, 2000, the primary objective of which is to provide legal recognition to what is commonly called "electronic commerce," declares that a Standard Electronic Signature is valid in HR documents, commercial agreements, consumer agreements, etc., but not valid in a Power of Attorney, Trust Deed, Will, or any other testamentary disposition, any contract for the sale or conveyance of immovable property, or any such interest in such property.
When an employee disputes the genuineness of his earlier e-signature, if you had followed the procedures of secure digital signature mentioned in Section 15 of the IT Act, 2000, there would be no problem.
But my question is, why can't you follow the conventional method of obtaining nomination forms, etc., with the individual's handwritten signature?
Kind regards,
[Your Name]
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I expected that some of the members of this forum who are very computer savvy would be answering your question, but no one has done so thus far. Perhaps your post may have escaped their attention. Therefore, as I am not computer savvy, I would like to answer your query as a layman. In the face of increasing cybercrimes, it would be better to limit the use of e-signatures in documents that can be contested about their veracity by anyone later.
Even the Information Technology Act, 2000, the primary objective of which is to provide legal recognition to what is commonly called "electronic commerce," declares that a Standard Electronic Signature is valid in HR documents, commercial agreements, consumer agreements, etc., but not valid in a Power of Attorney, Trust Deed, Will, or any other testamentary disposition, any contract for the sale or conveyance of immovable property, or any such interest in such property.
When an employee disputes the genuineness of his earlier e-signature, if you had followed the procedures of secure digital signature mentioned in Section 15 of the IT Act, 2000, there would be no problem.
But my question is, why can't you follow the conventional method of obtaining nomination forms, etc., with the individual's handwritten signature?
Kind regards,
[Your Name]
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Umakanthan,
I agree with you on manual signatures being obtained for nomination forms, but in today's IT world, this generation is eliminating anything manual, including signatures and documentation. Although I am from Gen X, I need to move ahead with the times.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I agree with you on manual signatures being obtained for nomination forms, but in today's IT world, this generation is eliminating anything manual, including signatures and documentation. Although I am from Gen X, I need to move ahead with the times.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.