The branch manager was hired, but his performance was too low. Even juniors pointed out the issue, and he left the company by resigning without serving the notice period. He worked in the company for only 22 days. What should HR and the company do to avoid processing the full and final settlement?
From India, New Delhi

Hi,

It is company-specific. Considering the short period of 22 days, either he can be relieved properly or can be advised to serve proper notice. However, I think for a 22-day notice period may not be required.

From India, Madras

Dear Lakshminarayanan,

Thank you for your input. I just wanted to brief you that the person joined the organization as Branch Manager and worked for 22 days in total. However, he resigned when he learned that the company was going to terminate his employment.

Will the company process the full and final settlement or any legal liabilities in this case?

Thank you.

From India, New Delhi

The particular new employee has a short stint of 22 days of service only in the organization, which kept the management skeptical about his performance, possibly leading to his termination. Sensing trouble, the employee resigned without notice, thus avoiding an awkward termination situation that could have been painful for both the employer and the employee. Therefore, it is advisable to accept his resignation while waiving the notice period, considering the brief period of ineffective service. He is not entitled to anything beyond his salary for the days worked, as part of the Full and Final Settlement.
From India, Salem

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR �

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.