We have been employing workmen through contractors. If we change the employee from one contractor to another contractor, will the contract employee be eligible for benefits like gratuity and other terminal benefits, or will his services be treated as a break.
Dear Friend,
The contractor under which he is going, if that contractor is bound by legal compliance, then he is liable to pay the benefits. If he is moving from one contractor to another, then his employment will be treated as new.
From India, Mumbai
The contractor under which he is going, if that contractor is bound by legal compliance, then he is liable to pay the benefits. If he is moving from one contractor to another, then his employment will be treated as new.
From India, Mumbai
Hi,
The Gratuity Act stipulates that eligibility requires continuous service of 5 years or more with a single employer or at the same premises. Gratuity serves as a loyalty payment to an employee from their employer.
In the case of contractor employees moving from one contractor to another, they are considered new employees in each instance. Therefore, they are not eligible for gratuity.
Regards, P. Packiaraj
From India, Bangalore
The Gratuity Act stipulates that eligibility requires continuous service of 5 years or more with a single employer or at the same premises. Gratuity serves as a loyalty payment to an employee from their employer.
In the case of contractor employees moving from one contractor to another, they are considered new employees in each instance. Therefore, they are not eligible for gratuity.
Regards, P. Packiaraj
From India, Bangalore
Dear Ayakkad,
The term "terminal benefit," as the very name would suggest in employment parlance, is the consequential monetary benefit due to an employee on his termination of employment after rendering a certain length of blemishless service under the same employer who is a legal entity as per its constitution. A contractor, therefore, would be a distinct legal entity such as a sole proprietor, partnership firm, or an incorporated company. It then follows, in general, that whenever termination of employment takes place due to non-renewal of the contract, the contractor is bound to pay gratuity only when the employees rendered the minimum qualifying service under him as per the provisions of the PG Act, 1972.
From India, Salem
The term "terminal benefit," as the very name would suggest in employment parlance, is the consequential monetary benefit due to an employee on his termination of employment after rendering a certain length of blemishless service under the same employer who is a legal entity as per its constitution. A contractor, therefore, would be a distinct legal entity such as a sole proprietor, partnership firm, or an incorporated company. It then follows, in general, that whenever termination of employment takes place due to non-renewal of the contract, the contractor is bound to pay gratuity only when the employees rendered the minimum qualifying service under him as per the provisions of the PG Act, 1972.
From India, Salem
When the contract itself is a sham, where the question of who should pay gratuity arises?
The act of engaging the same employee under a different contractor from time to time is proof that there does not exist a genuine contract. In such a situation, the contract becomes a sham contract, and the worker will get the benefits of regularization, thereby requiring the principal employer to pay gratuity and other terminal benefits.
From India, Kannur
The act of engaging the same employee under a different contractor from time to time is proof that there does not exist a genuine contract. In such a situation, the contract becomes a sham contract, and the worker will get the benefits of regularization, thereby requiring the principal employer to pay gratuity and other terminal benefits.
From India, Kannur
Changing employment from one contractor to another contractor, the Principal Employer has no liability for any F&F payment. However, ensure that before joining another contractor, the final dues are cleared from the first contractor and keep the papers with you for record.
From India, Ludhiana
From India, Ludhiana
The question is not about joining different contractors by a worker but engaging the same worker under different contractors. For example, Mr. A is an employee of contractor B, and when the contract expires, the same Mr. A is made an employee of Mr. C, the new contractor. You can choose any employer of your choice, but what is the liability of the principal employer when the same worker is engaged over many years but under different employers.
From India, Kannur
From India, Kannur
The workmen of one contractor cannot be workmen of another contractor. So, the change of employment from one contractor to another causes a break in service.
The case would be viewed differently in a Sham & Camouflage contract if the workmen continued to work in the same place for years together but a change of contractor is happening. In that scenario, the workmen will be eligible for all benefits under continuous service.
From India, Mumbai
The case would be viewed differently in a Sham & Camouflage contract if the workmen continued to work in the same place for years together but a change of contractor is happening. In that scenario, the workmen will be eligible for all benefits under continuous service.
From India, Mumbai
Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.