Earlier, we had terminated one of our employees because of company conditions, but now we have reappointed the same employee. Initially, he was covered under PF, but now we have increased his basic salary to ₹15,030, and we do not want him to be covered under PF.
Is it possible that he was covered under PF initially, but now we do not want to include him under PF?
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1Is it possible that he was covered under PF initially, but now we do not want to include him under PF?
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please create new ID alongwith declaration to not to be covered under PF - Form 11
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Simple example of a doubtful case by department. You have increased his basic to make him out of EPF, but what about ESIC? Using the old IP which clearly shows that he was an ex-employee of your establishment. However, if he has withdrawn his EPF and the old UAN is closed (I am sure that he has not received the amount from EPF even in case of withdrawal), it's better to cap the EPF amount at 15000 and adhere to the rules. Any mis-declaration could invite troubles for both the employee and employer.
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
HC All - Trainees not covered for PF -2010.pdf
PF Ledger.xls