Dear Sirs,
Please explain which settlement is best for the employer and which settlement is best for the union under the Industrial Dispute Act of 1947 - either 18(1) Bipartite or 12(3) Tripartite - and why.
With regards,
AK
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Please explain which settlement is best for the employer and which settlement is best for the union under the Industrial Dispute Act of 1947 - either 18(1) Bipartite or 12(3) Tripartite - and why.
With regards,
AK
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Colleague,
A tripartite settlement involving all three parties is always preferable. It is ironclad, binding on both parties, and no disputes on the matters covered by it during the settlement period can be raised.
Regards,
Vinayak Nagarkar
HR Consultant
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
660A tripartite settlement involving all three parties is always preferable. It is ironclad, binding on both parties, and no disputes on the matters covered by it during the settlement period can be raised.
Regards,
Vinayak Nagarkar
HR Consultant
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Settlement under Section 18(1) will only be binding between the parties who signed the settlement.
Whereas the settlement under Section 12(3), before the Conciliation officer, will have legal binding for all the employees of the organization as mentioned in the settlement, for the period stated in the settlement. Both are legally correct. The choice of which one is required to be decided depending on the situations, conditions, and parties to the settlement.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Whereas the settlement under Section 12(3), before the Conciliation officer, will have legal binding for all the employees of the organization as mentioned in the settlement, for the period stated in the settlement. Both are legally correct. The choice of which one is required to be decided depending on the situations, conditions, and parties to the settlement.
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please refer to the link here on CiteHR. It may help.
https://www.citehr.com/439684-re-id-...-3-18-3-a.html
From India, Vadodara
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
https://www.citehr.com/439684-re-id-...-3-18-3-a.html
From India, Vadodara
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Colleague,
In the normal course of events, a bipartite settlement is always beneficial for the industry and promotes better cohesiveness. The tripartite settlement comes into play when the bipartite settlement fails, and the matter is referred to the labor department for resolution. The agreement is signed among three parties - the Employer, the Union, and the Conciliation Officer.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In the normal course of events, a bipartite settlement is always beneficial for the industry and promotes better cohesiveness. The tripartite settlement comes into play when the bipartite settlement fails, and the matter is referred to the labor department for resolution. The agreement is signed among three parties - the Employer, the Union, and the Conciliation Officer.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Don't Just Communicate, Explain.pdf