I am working as an HR Manager in the service industry. The strength of the company is around 40 employees, excluding the management. In the management, we have our MD, Director, and Operations Manager. Our staff is very good. They are very dedicated towards their work. But if, after completing the work, they even speak for a few minutes or go to their colleague's seat for two minutes, this becomes an intolerable thing for the management. They want the staff to keep sitting from morning till evening, not speak to other staff members, as they think that this is indiscipline.
I, being an HR, try to maintain a light and healthy atmosphere in the office while not compromising with the work and quality. But I fail to do so. Can anyone please give any suggestions as this behavior of the management is pressurizing me and is giving a very negative message within our staff? I have spoken about the same to the management already, but they don't pay any heed to the same.
Can anybody please suggest what should be done in this scenario on my part as I am thinking to resign? It has been more than 1.3 years working here.
From India, Ghaziabad
4I, being an HR, try to maintain a light and healthy atmosphere in the office while not compromising with the work and quality. But I fail to do so. Can anyone please give any suggestions as this behavior of the management is pressurizing me and is giving a very negative message within our staff? I have spoken about the same to the management already, but they don't pay any heed to the same.
Can anybody please suggest what should be done in this scenario on my part as I am thinking to resign? It has been more than 1.3 years working here.
From India, Ghaziabad
Smart engagement for smart companies?build a workplace where people thrive. See It In Action - Book Your Demo
Dear Anjali,
Not allowing staff members to speak among themselves even for two minutes is the height of close and tight supervision. This type of management style was prevalent in Europe and the USA when industrialization began. Nowadays, a lot of talk is going on about whether robotization will impact work. However, your management has converted humans into robots. Possibly, yours could be the only company where robotization will have no impact!
Now, coming to a solution. You have written that you work in the service industry. What type of services does your company provide? What type of customers do you have? Do customers visit your company premises? In service companies, interaction with customers is an ongoing process. How does the interaction take place? Is it face to face, through email, or over the telephone? Due to the 2-minute breaks, will customer service be impacted?
Interaction or no interaction among staff members, a service company needs to measure various ratios to gauge business performance or customer satisfaction. How do you measure customer satisfaction? What are the parameters? How is business performance measured?
In all types of companies, teamwork is needed. To foster teamwork, if not emotional, at least a professional connection is essential. Why is your management so rigid about the interaction among staff members? A workplace of the 21st century is different. Companies invest heavily in employee engagement activities. As a part of these activities, some games are also conducted at the workplace. During discussions that follow after the games, an exchange of views takes place. Contrary to this, why has your management taken an inflexible stand that can be compared with the management style of the 19th century or the first half of the 20th century?
Yes, working under very close supervision is difficult. It will be unbearable if the person is outgoing, sociable, or lively. However, what about the other team members? Is this diktat of the management acceptable to other members? Have they expressed their dissatisfaction?
One of the solutions could be to organize a town hall meeting and have employees express their reservations about this forced quietness. If the inflexibility of the management continues, then quitting the job is always the solution!
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Not allowing staff members to speak among themselves even for two minutes is the height of close and tight supervision. This type of management style was prevalent in Europe and the USA when industrialization began. Nowadays, a lot of talk is going on about whether robotization will impact work. However, your management has converted humans into robots. Possibly, yours could be the only company where robotization will have no impact!
Now, coming to a solution. You have written that you work in the service industry. What type of services does your company provide? What type of customers do you have? Do customers visit your company premises? In service companies, interaction with customers is an ongoing process. How does the interaction take place? Is it face to face, through email, or over the telephone? Due to the 2-minute breaks, will customer service be impacted?
Interaction or no interaction among staff members, a service company needs to measure various ratios to gauge business performance or customer satisfaction. How do you measure customer satisfaction? What are the parameters? How is business performance measured?
In all types of companies, teamwork is needed. To foster teamwork, if not emotional, at least a professional connection is essential. Why is your management so rigid about the interaction among staff members? A workplace of the 21st century is different. Companies invest heavily in employee engagement activities. As a part of these activities, some games are also conducted at the workplace. During discussions that follow after the games, an exchange of views takes place. Contrary to this, why has your management taken an inflexible stand that can be compared with the management style of the 19th century or the first half of the 20th century?
Yes, working under very close supervision is difficult. It will be unbearable if the person is outgoing, sociable, or lively. However, what about the other team members? Is this diktat of the management acceptable to other members? Have they expressed their dissatisfaction?
One of the solutions could be to organize a town hall meeting and have employees express their reservations about this forced quietness. If the inflexibility of the management continues, then quitting the job is always the solution!
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Dear Dinesh Sir, Thank You Very Much for your response. But I am resigining today from this company as I am not able to take the misbehaviour of the management. But thanks a lot Sir.
From India, Ghaziabad
From India, Ghaziabad
Out of academic curiosity, I would like to know, what is the management's actual view on this? When you have brought this matter up to them and have asked them to relax the rules, what is the reason they have given to you as to why they would not be agreeable to a change.
The other thing I would like to know is whether there is an actual complaint from the employees in this regard.
From India, Mumbai
The other thing I would like to know is whether there is an actual complaint from the employees in this regard.
From India, Mumbai
Nowadays, management has to understand that the workflow will be better if the employees are in good relations. Relations happen with communication only. The people who are in good relations by talking every day can cooperate within themselves and produce good results for the company. However, communication should not exceed the time limit, and work should receive preference. OK, Anjali, all the best. Try to convince the management of the above wherever you join.
From India, Mysore
From India, Mysore
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.