Dear Sir,
I was terminated in 1991 on the grounds of unauthorized absence. I won the case from the labor court in 2004. The opponent filed a writ in the Delhi High Court in 2004, and it is still pending due to the delaying tactics of the opponent. The lower court mentioned in the award that the versions of the management are falsified.
A rule was issued in 2010, and in 2014, the application for early hearing was allowed based on my disability and the disability certificate filed/available in the court. Still, the opponent is not allowing the court to conclude the final arguments, and now the issue is listed in the category of Regulars. What should I do? Is this the system? It has been listed for final disposal twice, and still, there is no resolution. What remedy do I have? Should I go for early hearing again? This is not a fair system of the court. Only 23 months are left until my retirement. What should I do? The honorable court seems to be acting contradictory. What steps should I take, and where should I seek justice? Justice is not meant for the poor. Please advise.
I shall be grateful for such kindness and, if possible, reply via email.
Regards,
Vimal Mehta
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
I was terminated in 1991 on the grounds of unauthorized absence. I won the case from the labor court in 2004. The opponent filed a writ in the Delhi High Court in 2004, and it is still pending due to the delaying tactics of the opponent. The lower court mentioned in the award that the versions of the management are falsified.
A rule was issued in 2010, and in 2014, the application for early hearing was allowed based on my disability and the disability certificate filed/available in the court. Still, the opponent is not allowing the court to conclude the final arguments, and now the issue is listed in the category of Regulars. What should I do? Is this the system? It has been listed for final disposal twice, and still, there is no resolution. What remedy do I have? Should I go for early hearing again? This is not a fair system of the court. Only 23 months are left until my retirement. What should I do? The honorable court seems to be acting contradictory. What steps should I take, and where should I seek justice? Justice is not meant for the poor. Please advise.
I shall be grateful for such kindness and, if possible, reply via email.
Regards,
Vimal Mehta
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Go in front of justice that is the only solution for you.. You should express your concern before justice ....
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
7From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
A PSU is not expected to adopt dilly-dallying tactics. Ask your advocate to move a special plea in the court for a quick hearing and highlight the dates on which the PSU has been absent to prolong the case and make the opponent withdraw in frustration. Sunny Deol's dialogue of "Tareek pe tareek" is seen in real life. Tell your advocate to press for quick hearings.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I can understand your pain. The same thing I have faced in the past. I was put in regular. Keeping in mind the lifespan of your service, you can at least file an SLP before the SC against the order of the HC for direction/interim relief. However, the SLP will be dismissed; nevertheless, your case may be taken out from regular.
I am happy that you brought up your case. In the previous discussion against the case of Mr. Rao, I was focusing on PIL and invoking the SC jurisdiction under Article 32, although the scope of jurisdiction is confined to Fundamental Rights only. I do not know whether you are a permanent/regular employee of PSU or a contractual one. But the remedy is an SLP to mount pressure on HC.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am happy that you brought up your case. In the previous discussion against the case of Mr. Rao, I was focusing on PIL and invoking the SC jurisdiction under Article 32, although the scope of jurisdiction is confined to Fundamental Rights only. I do not know whether you are a permanent/regular employee of PSU or a contractual one. But the remedy is an SLP to mount pressure on HC.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
i am helpless person without fee for advocates. and opp psu and its advocates hv made football. they hv violated all their own rules and advocate also what to do. ths
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am wondering if the counsels of the PSU filed only a 3-page synopsis instead of the full set of appeal to the HC after 4 years, i.e., 7 years ago in 2008, and there has been no progress in the HC for the last seven years!
I noticed a contradiction in your post. You mentioned that only 23 months are left until your retirement, while your profile indicates that you are a retired person. Could you please clarify this contradiction and provide the real case history?
Furthermore, if you wish, you may send a scanned copy of the order of 2004 from the labor court as well as the synopsis filed in the HC by the PSU via email at [dcgroup1962@gmail.com] for my examination?
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I noticed a contradiction in your post. You mentioned that only 23 months are left until your retirement, while your profile indicates that you are a retired person. Could you please clarify this contradiction and provide the real case history?
Furthermore, if you wish, you may send a scanned copy of the order of 2004 from the labor court as well as the synopsis filed in the HC by the PSU via email at [dcgroup1962@gmail.com] for my examination?
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Kindly reply to my queries genuinely:
I am wondering if you were a permanent regular employee of PSU, then you should have gone to CAT rather than the Labour Court.
Whether your case is pending before the Division Bench of the High Court or a Single Judge?
What is your Case Number, Category of Suit, and instituting year?
So that I can see your proceedings online and advise you accordingly genuinely, not like a lawyer but like an in-person litigant.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am wondering if you were a permanent regular employee of PSU, then you should have gone to CAT rather than the Labour Court.
Whether your case is pending before the Division Bench of the High Court or a Single Judge?
What is your Case Number, Category of Suit, and instituting year?
So that I can see your proceedings online and advise you accordingly genuinely, not like a lawyer but like an in-person litigant.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Strange are the ways of our courts or quasi-judicial authorities. Only today, I read in the media that one Janhavi Gadkar got bail, her car returned to her, and even her driving license. She was driving in a drunken state in her luxury car and killed two persons in the process. If I remember correctly, she is a lawyer herself (decision by the Mumbai Sessions Court today).
What hopes does a commoner have, especially against a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) where no one is accountable (generally, I hasten to add) and is fighting their own battle? However, I have seen opposite examples as well, giving you a reason not to lose hope.
Please respond to the previous expert, Mr. Poddar, and others who are keen to help. Good luck.
A S Bhat
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
What hopes does a commoner have, especially against a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) where no one is accountable (generally, I hasten to add) and is fighting their own battle? However, I have seen opposite examples as well, giving you a reason not to lose hope.
Please respond to the previous expert, Mr. Poddar, and others who are keen to help. Good luck.
A S Bhat
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Accent neutralization practice worksheets V1.pdf
Best Practice.ppt