Dear Seniors My query is: When a company 'A' acquires company 'B', can company 'A' fire the employee(s) of company 'B' in the name of downsizing. Is this legal. Regards Parikshit
From India, Gurgaon
From India, Gurgaon
Hi,
An employer may dismiss an employee without any notice in any of the following cases:
- If the employee assumes a personality or nationality other than his own, or has submitted fake documents or certificates.
- If the employee was appointed under probation and the termination happened during that period or at its end.
- If the employee commits a mistake causing the employer a big financial loss, provided the employer informs the labor department of the incident within 48 hours.
- If the employee violates instructions relating to safety in the place of work, provided those instructions were written and displayed in a permanent place, and the employee has been informed of these instructions orally if he is illiterate.
- If the employee fails to carry out his basic duties as stated in the contract and continues to do so despite a written interrogation and a warning that his service will be terminated if he repeats his actions.
- If he discloses a secret of the establishment for whom he is working.
- If he is conclusively convicted by the concerned court of a crime involving honor or his honesty and public morals.
- If he is found drunk or intoxicated by drugs during working hours.
- If he commits a physical assault on the employer, manager, or one of his colleagues during work.
- If he becomes absent without a legitimate reason for more than 20 intermittent days or more than 7 continuous days within one year.
From India, Mumbai
An employer may dismiss an employee without any notice in any of the following cases:
- If the employee assumes a personality or nationality other than his own, or has submitted fake documents or certificates.
- If the employee was appointed under probation and the termination happened during that period or at its end.
- If the employee commits a mistake causing the employer a big financial loss, provided the employer informs the labor department of the incident within 48 hours.
- If the employee violates instructions relating to safety in the place of work, provided those instructions were written and displayed in a permanent place, and the employee has been informed of these instructions orally if he is illiterate.
- If the employee fails to carry out his basic duties as stated in the contract and continues to do so despite a written interrogation and a warning that his service will be terminated if he repeats his actions.
- If he discloses a secret of the establishment for whom he is working.
- If he is conclusively convicted by the concerned court of a crime involving honor or his honesty and public morals.
- If he is found drunk or intoxicated by drugs during working hours.
- If he commits a physical assault on the employer, manager, or one of his colleagues during work.
- If he becomes absent without a legitimate reason for more than 20 intermittent days or more than 7 continuous days within one year.
From India, Mumbai
Dear Parikshit,
In the case of the acquisition of one company by another, certainly there would be a clause in the acquisition deed regarding the employees of the acquired company. If nothing is mentioned and the employees are permitted as usual by the acquirer, it implies that their services have been acquired along with other assets and liabilities, and as such, there cannot be any alteration in their service conditions without observing the provisions of the law governing their service conditions. If anything is mentioned in the acquisition deed regarding the specific number of employees to be continued in service after acquisition, then the liability for compensation rests with the vendor. However, I think your question presupposes that the transfer of services has already taken place.
From India, Salem
In the case of the acquisition of one company by another, certainly there would be a clause in the acquisition deed regarding the employees of the acquired company. If nothing is mentioned and the employees are permitted as usual by the acquirer, it implies that their services have been acquired along with other assets and liabilities, and as such, there cannot be any alteration in their service conditions without observing the provisions of the law governing their service conditions. If anything is mentioned in the acquisition deed regarding the specific number of employees to be continued in service after acquisition, then the liability for compensation rests with the vendor. However, I think your question presupposes that the transfer of services has already taken place.
From India, Salem
After the acquisition of company B by company A, the service conditions of the employees of company B should be guided by the memorandum of understanding between the two companies and any subsequent notifications issued after the approval of the Appropriate Authority.
From India, Bokaro
From India, Bokaro
I was the HR head of a state PSU in Kerala, which was acquired by a JV Co between India and another country. I was involved in the process of this takeover from the HR side. The processes involved were as follows:
Govt of Kerala, after many discussions, issued a GO transferring the unit to the JV Co subject to the agreed conditions.
There was an agreement of handing over/taking over between the two entities.
There was a settlement with the unions of employees and the two companies.
The JV issued an order of absorption to all the employees subject to the agreed conditions in the agreement and settlement.
All employees gave an undertaking agreeing to the above conditions.
In the above documents, it was agreed that:
- The previous service of all the employees will be protected for all legal benefits.
- The rate of PF contribution will be based on actual salary.
- All employees will receive a wage revision from the date of takeover.
- All the fringe benefits received in cash will be continued.
- All other benefits which had a statutory binding will be continued.
There was clarity on every aspect of employees' and employers' concerns.
Varghese Mathew
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Govt of Kerala, after many discussions, issued a GO transferring the unit to the JV Co subject to the agreed conditions.
There was an agreement of handing over/taking over between the two entities.
There was a settlement with the unions of employees and the two companies.
The JV issued an order of absorption to all the employees subject to the agreed conditions in the agreement and settlement.
All employees gave an undertaking agreeing to the above conditions.
In the above documents, it was agreed that:
- The previous service of all the employees will be protected for all legal benefits.
- The rate of PF contribution will be based on actual salary.
- All employees will receive a wage revision from the date of takeover.
- All the fringe benefits received in cash will be continued.
- All other benefits which had a statutory binding will be continued.
There was clarity on every aspect of employees' and employers' concerns.
Varghese Mathew
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
As a matter of norm, normally, the majority of top management team members can expect a pink slip sooner or later. Some of the weak links, low performers, overconfident individuals, troublemakers need to worry. Ultimately, it would be a business decision, despite potential legal hassles.
Cheers!
Diwakar
From India, Bangalore
Cheers!
Diwakar
From India, Bangalore
Dear Seniors and HR,
Presently, I am heading the training division. Although I have 28 years of experience, my services have not been recognized, and I have laid the groundwork to transform it into a profit center as the head. However, management is unwilling to provide support when I ask for help, such as cost reductions in advertising. They are also causing disruptions in my work. I am unable to resign from my position due to personal reasons.
Please suggest how I can approach management again regarding this issue. Previous attempts through personal and email discussions have not yielded any positive results. I have heard internally that individuals who have completed two years are treated similarly. Your assistance in providing suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
From India, Chennai
Presently, I am heading the training division. Although I have 28 years of experience, my services have not been recognized, and I have laid the groundwork to transform it into a profit center as the head. However, management is unwilling to provide support when I ask for help, such as cost reductions in advertising. They are also causing disruptions in my work. I am unable to resign from my position due to personal reasons.
Please suggest how I can approach management again regarding this issue. Previous attempts through personal and email discussions have not yielded any positive results. I have heard internally that individuals who have completed two years are treated similarly. Your assistance in providing suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
From India, Chennai
Dear friends,
As far as I know, in any Mergers & Acquisitions, the Acquiring Company always tries to retain their option, a clause in the Deed, a discretion of having their own manpower either to retain some or look to market and/or both. An employment is a contract between the employer and employee with a termination clause, of course with a compensation package. Therefore, there is no right to permanency except the compensation when separated. An article on this is attached to give a general idea on M & A.
[Protect Yourself In A Merger - Lawyers.com](http://employee-benefits.lawyers.com/employee-benefits/protect-yourself-in-a-merger.html)
From India, Bangalore
As far as I know, in any Mergers & Acquisitions, the Acquiring Company always tries to retain their option, a clause in the Deed, a discretion of having their own manpower either to retain some or look to market and/or both. An employment is a contract between the employer and employee with a termination clause, of course with a compensation package. Therefore, there is no right to permanency except the compensation when separated. An article on this is attached to give a general idea on M & A.
[Protect Yourself In A Merger - Lawyers.com](http://employee-benefits.lawyers.com/employee-benefits/protect-yourself-in-a-merger.html)
From India, Bangalore
Dear All,
As per the section 25 FF of ID Act 1947 in case of any change in management by whatsoever means, workmen of the exiting entity should be service with Notice and shall be entitled compensation as if he has been retrenshed in terms of section 25F.
However if the employees/workmen has been transfered with similiar or better benefits n terms of service condition, gratuity etc than no notice shall be given.
"Where the ownership of management of an undertaking is transferred, whether by agreement or by operation of law, from the employer in relation to or that undertaking to a new employer, every workman who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such transfer shall be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 25F, as if the workman had been retrenched:
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to a workman in any case where there has been a change of employers by reason of the transfer, if—
(a) the service of the workman has not been interrupted by such transfer;
(b) the terms and conditions of service applicable to the workman after such transfer are not in any way less favourable to the workman than those applicable to him immediately before the transfer; and
(c) the new employer is, under the terms of such transfer or otherwise, legally liable to pay to the workman, in the event of his retrenchment, compensation on the basis that his service has been continuous and has not been interrupted by the transfer.]
So, the written consent of employee shall be mandatory in absence of written consent and acceptance there shall be industrial dispute.
In case employee don't want to transfer to new establishment or management, he shall be entitled to all compensation as if he has been retrenched from services. But it shall be subject to that employee should have completed 240 days as continous service in establishmen of transforer.
Though the liability and other compensation payment from management point of view has to be inserted into agreement to seting out liability of both parties.
During M&A exercise, its an important point to be taken care.
As stated above, an acquirer has to ensure continuity of service. The benefits that any worker is entitled to are linked to the total number of days the individual has worked in the organization. For example,a workman is entitled to receive gratuity after completing five years of continuous service. Section 2A of the Payment of Gratuity
Act, 1972 defines continuous service as an uninterrupted period of an employee’s service.
From India, Delhi
As per the section 25 FF of ID Act 1947 in case of any change in management by whatsoever means, workmen of the exiting entity should be service with Notice and shall be entitled compensation as if he has been retrenshed in terms of section 25F.
However if the employees/workmen has been transfered with similiar or better benefits n terms of service condition, gratuity etc than no notice shall be given.
"Where the ownership of management of an undertaking is transferred, whether by agreement or by operation of law, from the employer in relation to or that undertaking to a new employer, every workman who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such transfer shall be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 25F, as if the workman had been retrenched:
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to a workman in any case where there has been a change of employers by reason of the transfer, if—
(a) the service of the workman has not been interrupted by such transfer;
(b) the terms and conditions of service applicable to the workman after such transfer are not in any way less favourable to the workman than those applicable to him immediately before the transfer; and
(c) the new employer is, under the terms of such transfer or otherwise, legally liable to pay to the workman, in the event of his retrenchment, compensation on the basis that his service has been continuous and has not been interrupted by the transfer.]
So, the written consent of employee shall be mandatory in absence of written consent and acceptance there shall be industrial dispute.
In case employee don't want to transfer to new establishment or management, he shall be entitled to all compensation as if he has been retrenched from services. But it shall be subject to that employee should have completed 240 days as continous service in establishmen of transforer.
Though the liability and other compensation payment from management point of view has to be inserted into agreement to seting out liability of both parties.
During M&A exercise, its an important point to be taken care.
As stated above, an acquirer has to ensure continuity of service. The benefits that any worker is entitled to are linked to the total number of days the individual has worked in the organization. For example,a workman is entitled to receive gratuity after completing five years of continuous service. Section 2A of the Payment of Gratuity
Act, 1972 defines continuous service as an uninterrupted period of an employee’s service.
From India, Delhi
Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.