15th February 2013
To
Mr. N. Krishna
Sal 1772, Engineering
S/o Sri Narayana Rao,
D.No.2-121, Sri Rama Nagar,
Gopalapatnam,
Vizag-530027.
CHARGE SHEET
It has been observed from the Time Office records that you have been absent from duties unauthorizedly from 28/01/2013 to the present date without prior sanction and without applying for leave from your Department Head.
Unauthorized absence has caused a disruption of work and severe constraints to the Company. Your unauthorized absence from duty has resulted in the dislocation of scheduled works, and production targets have been adversely affected. It amounts to misconduct as stated in Clause 24 of Sub Clauses 9, 52 & 54 of Certified Standing Orders of the Company detailed below:
Sub Clause 9: Habitual Late Attendance and Habitual Absence without leave or without sufficient cause.
Sub Clause 52: Breaching any or all the Leave Rules, Clauses.
Sub Clause 54: Riotous or disorderly behavior towards superiors/co-workers during working hours on the premises of the business of the Company or outside, or any act subversive to discipline in connection with the work of the factory/company.
You are advised to report for duty and submit your explanation within 48 hours from the date of receipt of this Charge Sheet as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you. Failure to do so will result in the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against you.
Rajesh K
Human Resources
From India, Kakinada
71To
Mr. N. Krishna
Sal 1772, Engineering
S/o Sri Narayana Rao,
D.No.2-121, Sri Rama Nagar,
Gopalapatnam,
Vizag-530027.
CHARGE SHEET
It has been observed from the Time Office records that you have been absent from duties unauthorizedly from 28/01/2013 to the present date without prior sanction and without applying for leave from your Department Head.
Unauthorized absence has caused a disruption of work and severe constraints to the Company. Your unauthorized absence from duty has resulted in the dislocation of scheduled works, and production targets have been adversely affected. It amounts to misconduct as stated in Clause 24 of Sub Clauses 9, 52 & 54 of Certified Standing Orders of the Company detailed below:
Sub Clause 9: Habitual Late Attendance and Habitual Absence without leave or without sufficient cause.
Sub Clause 52: Breaching any or all the Leave Rules, Clauses.
Sub Clause 54: Riotous or disorderly behavior towards superiors/co-workers during working hours on the premises of the business of the Company or outside, or any act subversive to discipline in connection with the work of the factory/company.
You are advised to report for duty and submit your explanation within 48 hours from the date of receipt of this Charge Sheet as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you. Failure to do so will result in the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against you.
Rajesh K
Human Resources
From India, Kakinada
Hi Rajesh, What’s your idea/intention to publish such a letter here??? Ukmitra
From Saudi Arabia, Riyadh
From Saudi Arabia, Riyadh
Dear Rajesh,
Why do you want to post this type of legal letter in this manner? There are several issues with the letter:
1. The date of the prepared letter is older than the displayed date.
2. There is no proof of receipt attached.
3. If you can send this letter by Registered post, it can serve as evidence.
Lakshminaryana
From India, Hyderabad
Why do you want to post this type of legal letter in this manner? There are several issues with the letter:
1. The date of the prepared letter is older than the displayed date.
2. There is no proof of receipt attached.
3. If you can send this letter by Registered post, it can serve as evidence.
Lakshminaryana
From India, Hyderabad
Dear Rajesh.K,
You have simply posted the letter of Charge Sheet addressed to Mr. N. Krishna without mentioning what you want us to do. It is so unfortunate that a man of Human Resources behaves in an irrational and immature manner. Your action is nothing more than childish. If you have sufficient time, please spend it constructively without wasting others' time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
You have simply posted the letter of Charge Sheet addressed to Mr. N. Krishna without mentioning what you want us to do. It is so unfortunate that a man of Human Resources behaves in an irrational and immature manner. Your action is nothing more than childish. If you have sufficient time, please spend it constructively without wasting others' time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Dear Rajesh,
Greetings!
I echo the views of BS Kalsi. The letter that you have made public is a part of the employee's personal file, which is confidential. What if the recipient of this letter sues you for making this information public?
From India, Delhi
Greetings!
I echo the views of BS Kalsi. The letter that you have made public is a part of the employee's personal file, which is confidential. What if the recipient of this letter sues you for making this information public?
From India, Delhi
Hello Rajesh,
Do you intend to defame or humiliate the addressee publicly? Is that the reason you published the internal official letter publicly? The only positive point of this letter is that it may be used as a "sample charge-sheet letter," and nothing else. But neither is this forum the appropriate place to post it blindly without any good reason, nor is this act ethically advisable!
Best regards
From India, Kolkata
Do you intend to defame or humiliate the addressee publicly? Is that the reason you published the internal official letter publicly? The only positive point of this letter is that it may be used as a "sample charge-sheet letter," and nothing else. But neither is this forum the appropriate place to post it blindly without any good reason, nor is this act ethically advisable!
Best regards
From India, Kolkata
for exp : Advisce How to wright replay letter It is use full for union leaders please aloberate. diferernt models please respond.
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
Dear Vasu Kumar,
Please clarify what you want to say. I am sorry to say that neither your English spellings are correct nor the sentence makes any sense. My advice to you is to please have patience in building a proper and meaningful sentence when raising a query. Please check TWICE before mailing it. I apologize in advance for being harsh.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Please clarify what you want to say. I am sorry to say that neither your English spellings are correct nor the sentence makes any sense. My advice to you is to please have patience in building a proper and meaningful sentence when raising a query. Please check TWICE before mailing it. I apologize in advance for being harsh.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Dear Rajesh K,
If you had mentioned the same sentence in your initial mail, there would not have been so much hullabaloo for your posting of the charge sheet as a query, and you would have saved yourself from the members' rebuke. However, it is better late than never.
Good day and have a nice time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
If you had mentioned the same sentence in your initial mail, there would not have been so much hullabaloo for your posting of the charge sheet as a query, and you would have saved yourself from the members' rebuke. However, it is better late than never.
Good day and have a nice time.
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.