If an employee forgets to mark attendance and later claims for it, can the employee be marked absent and not permitted to mark attendance for a previous day. Is there any directive in Labor law, Shop Act Licence or any govt notification that prohibits this action.
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
If it is a genuine lapse on the part of the employee, he can be allowed to mark attendance.Whether it is agenuine case or not need to be verified wih reference to evidence and witnesses.
B.Saikumar
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
B.Saikumar
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
First of all it has to be checked wheather is it regular habbit of the invisual.
Secondly it is his right to claim for the attandance if he is present but he has to produce some evidences like any signed document during his duty,any minutes of the meeting,cct footages etc.
Thirdly HR has to be very strict on attendance signing because in any incident occures inside the premises and person in the primises is without any entry than legal issue will rise.
From Taiwan,
Secondly it is his right to claim for the attandance if he is present but he has to produce some evidences like any signed document during his duty,any minutes of the meeting,cct footages etc.
Thirdly HR has to be very strict on attendance signing because in any incident occures inside the premises and person in the primises is without any entry than legal issue will rise.
From Taiwan,
If HR decides not to allow the person to mark attendance though he was present, primarily because of not following procedure, is that valid as per law? There are certain people who do not mark attendance and later claim for it at the time of payroll. We already have a policy that if anyone fails to mark attendance, he/she should claim for the same within 24 hours, beyond which it will be treated as absent. I just want to confirm if this is permissible as per law?
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
Irrespective of lapse on the part of employee, it is basic function of HR department to generate correct and accurate attendance of employees. His attendance could also be verified with the help of Production Report of particular day..
Under the provisions of The Factory Act - 1948 it is responsibility of employer to maintain Muster Roll of all employees deployed for work.If employer omits any name he would be liable for prosecution.
P.N.Pathak.
Sr HR Manager.
9822790693 .
From India, Pune
Under the provisions of The Factory Act - 1948 it is responsibility of employer to maintain Muster Roll of all employees deployed for work.If employer omits any name he would be liable for prosecution.
P.N.Pathak.
Sr HR Manager.
9822790693 .
From India, Pune
Please go thru the contribution made by undersigned
Legal Laws for Late coming Deduction. It is sort of an internal circular of our organisation. It deals with all possible circumstances for flouting rules of the organisation by employees. Hope you will find the same suitable in your case too.
Jawaharlal Moondra
9829028028
From India, Jodhpur
Legal Laws for Late coming Deduction. It is sort of an internal circular of our organisation. It deals with all possible circumstances for flouting rules of the organisation by employees. Hope you will find the same suitable in your case too.
Jawaharlal Moondra
9829028028
From India, Jodhpur
Dear Sum , Is the rule being referred by you, the Standing Orders applicable. If it is so, then refusing regularisation of missing punch is perfectly legal. Assuming it is not, when there is a rule to that effect, then it has to be ensured for the sake of discipline and to ensure uniformity, otherwise there will be chaos. Well this rule can be defended in case it is challenged although as per Payment of Wages Act deduction can be made only in proportion to the absence. Regards
;KK
From India, Bhopal
;KK
From India, Bhopal
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.