782
Same PPT has been sent by hima1 on 3/7/09. I have been critical about such things in my many posts earlier. I don't understand what the objective is of the same presentations being sent by so many people with different captions. It's just a waste of time for others. We should request a ban on such offenders.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
By oversight, I might have sent a repeat presentation. That does not mean I have committed a great crime. Your words should be softer, and as an HR person, you should avoid terms like "offenders." I have shared a lot of information with others, and your comment has made me rethink posting on this site.
Great Day
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
By oversight, I might have sent a repeat presentation. That does not mean I have committed a great crime. Your words should be softer, and as an HR person, you should avoid terms like "offenders." I have shared a lot of information with others, and your comment has made me rethink posting on this site.
Great Day
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
This is Good....Keep it up...at least this this gives us a break in heavy work schedule.....
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
My dear Balaji,
I am appending herewith the response from HIMA1.
I hope you have checked her post; if not, please do. Here's the link again: https://www.citehr.com/175978-amazing-illusions.html
QUOTE=hima1;765723]Dear Raj Kumar,
Thanks for the information! I checked out the link.
My date of posting - 3/7/09.
Mr. Balaji's date of posting - 4/07/09.
This forum is too wide with too many sections, and it is naturally difficult for one to cover every single post.
With due respect to everyone, my personal opinion is that no one would like to repost deliberately!! They might have missed reading it. And also, the ones who missed reading the first post might find the same interesting! If one finds it a repost, they can always avoid the same and go on to the other post!!
Of course, one can minimize reposts to an extent by using the search options!!:icon1::icon1::icon1:
Thanks again! Have a great day!!
[/QUOTE]
You will find my response too, there.
:?: I am not accusing you of any crime.
:icon7: In my opinion, soft words would not be appropriate here.
:idea: I have used appropriate words. If you had been a good student of HRM, you would know that words like "offence", "offending", "offender", "delinquent", "misconduct", "punishment" etc. are all perfectly right, permissible, and HR-related words.
However, do not feel disheartened. I have enjoyed and appreciated your 'sharings' in the past. I was giving my opinion on just one incident. It is good that you have taken note of it and would be more careful in the future - after all, you have a very good reputation to protect.
Regards.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am appending herewith the response from HIMA1.
I hope you have checked her post; if not, please do. Here's the link again: https://www.citehr.com/175978-amazing-illusions.html
QUOTE=hima1;765723]Dear Raj Kumar,
Thanks for the information! I checked out the link.
My date of posting - 3/7/09.
Mr. Balaji's date of posting - 4/07/09.
This forum is too wide with too many sections, and it is naturally difficult for one to cover every single post.
With due respect to everyone, my personal opinion is that no one would like to repost deliberately!! They might have missed reading it. And also, the ones who missed reading the first post might find the same interesting! If one finds it a repost, they can always avoid the same and go on to the other post!!
Of course, one can minimize reposts to an extent by using the search options!!:icon1::icon1::icon1:
Thanks again! Have a great day!!
[/QUOTE]
You will find my response too, there.
:?: I am not accusing you of any crime.
:icon7: In my opinion, soft words would not be appropriate here.
:idea: I have used appropriate words. If you had been a good student of HRM, you would know that words like "offence", "offending", "offender", "delinquent", "misconduct", "punishment" etc. are all perfectly right, permissible, and HR-related words.
However, do not feel disheartened. I have enjoyed and appreciated your 'sharings' in the past. I was giving my opinion on just one incident. It is good that you have taken note of it and would be more careful in the future - after all, you have a very good reputation to protect.
Regards.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear SrBalaji,
It is good that you posted it again or fresh. It served those visitors who could not see it through the earlier post by hima1. Your uploads are always appreciated, and you have a remarkable contribution to this site. However, since this post was so recent, people remembered it.
I do not find any harsh words in Raj Kumar's feedback, although if you did not like his way of pointing it out, you could have mentioned it in one line of your "complaint," one or more lines of "how it happened," and one line for hima1 (since she made the first effort to upload this). If one can accept one thousand "thanks," then why not one "no thanks"?
Let us "think and do" to build our capacity.
Regards
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It is good that you posted it again or fresh. It served those visitors who could not see it through the earlier post by hima1. Your uploads are always appreciated, and you have a remarkable contribution to this site. However, since this post was so recent, people remembered it.
I do not find any harsh words in Raj Kumar's feedback, although if you did not like his way of pointing it out, you could have mentioned it in one line of your "complaint," one or more lines of "how it happened," and one line for hima1 (since she made the first effort to upload this). If one can accept one thousand "thanks," then why not one "no thanks"?
Let us "think and do" to build our capacity.
Regards
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Colleagues:
While Mr. Rajkumar has a point, we cannot find fault with Mr. Balaji in his present post, as he may have received it from a different source. Another aspect to consider is that all of us have the liberty to post our views, presentations, and attachments online in the CiteHr Community without any prior screening. It is quite likely that some posts of the same type would make repeated rounds. If the Administration in CiteHr could introduce a system to screen the attachments and presentations before publication to avoid possible repetition, it would be a welcome move.
R. Sundararajan
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
While Mr. Rajkumar has a point, we cannot find fault with Mr. Balaji in his present post, as he may have received it from a different source. Another aspect to consider is that all of us have the liberty to post our views, presentations, and attachments online in the CiteHr Community without any prior screening. It is quite likely that some posts of the same type would make repeated rounds. If the Administration in CiteHr could introduce a system to screen the attachments and presentations before publication to avoid possible repetition, it would be a welcome move.
R. Sundararajan
From India, Madras
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
ChrisLandauer-i llusions.ppt
Illusions.doc