Hi, could anyone please highlight what exactly (if any) are the key points of technical difference between Compulsory Arbitration and Adjudication? Is there any technical/legal difference at all between these two terms, or is there no difference as such, and are they just another two different bookish terminologies for the same law? A detailed explanation would be really appreciated, please.
Thanks,
Brandon
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
4Thanks,
Brandon
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please follow the post by binubabu, which is available at the following link: https://www.citehr.com/91631-types-a...mportance.html
Compulsory Arbitration is a tool of Joint Consultative Machinery formed for the settlement of disputes of Central Government employees. It cannot be synonymous with Adjudication, the order of which is binding as a judicial order.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Compulsory Arbitration is a tool of Joint Consultative Machinery formed for the settlement of disputes of Central Government employees. It cannot be synonymous with Adjudication, the order of which is binding as a judicial order.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
As I understand, in the Indian context, Compulsory Arbitration stands for the redressal of disputes among government employees under the Joint Consultation Machinery. In the private sector, voluntary arbitration and adjudication are the mechanisms for settling disputes. A dispute can be referred to adjudication by the government if it finds that an industrial dispute exists. This is done when voluntary arbitration fails to settle the dispute, and when either or both parties to the dispute seek government intervention for adjudication. However, an employee or a group of employees can also directly refer a dispute to adjudication.
The order passed by arbitration is not judicial or quasi-judicial, and if not enforced, the award ceases to exist, whereas the award of adjudication will be binding on the parties.
Please try the following link. However, I am not sure whether the same is written in the Indian context: Types of arbitration MBA Notes on Types of arbitration.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The order passed by arbitration is not judicial or quasi-judicial, and if not enforced, the award ceases to exist, whereas the award of adjudication will be binding on the parties.
Please try the following link. However, I am not sure whether the same is written in the Indian context: Types of arbitration MBA Notes on Types of arbitration.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.